<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 800 SD Churches rally against the 1st Amendment . . uh . . I mean abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/09/800-sd-churches-rally-against-the-1st-amendment-uh-i-mean-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/09/800-sd-churches-rally-against-the-1st-amendment-uh-i-mean-abortion/</link>
	<description>Editorial Cartoonist from South Dakota</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:11:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nikole</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/09/800-sd-churches-rally-against-the-1st-amendment-uh-i-mean-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-3167</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=1638#comment-3167</guid>
		<description>Wrong - you speciically said &quot;but when they weigh in on political issues they are over stepping their boundries and should have to pay taxes as a PAC not a church&quot; -- And what I was saying about the Johnson amendment corrected you. The only thing that a pastor can not say is &quot;Vote for X candidate&quot; 

And you completely avoided the first part of my comment which stated about other non-profit organizations being silenced. If you don&#039;t want to hear the church&#039;s opinion because we hold a 501c3 status, then Planned Parenthood should not be allowed to weigh in on this either as they also are considered NonProfit. If they have an opinion about ballot issues they too should have to pay taxes, don&#039;t ya think?

Or does this only apply to the church as far as your concerned?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong &#8211; you speciically said &#8220;but when they weigh in on political issues they are over stepping their boundries and should have to pay taxes as a PAC not a church&#8221; &#8212; And what I was saying about the Johnson amendment corrected you. The only thing that a pastor can not say is &#8220;Vote for X candidate&#8221; </p>
<p>And you completely avoided the first part of my comment which stated about other non-profit organizations being silenced. If you don&#8217;t want to hear the church&#8217;s opinion because we hold a 501c3 status, then Planned Parenthood should not be allowed to weigh in on this either as they also are considered NonProfit. If they have an opinion about ballot issues they too should have to pay taxes, don&#8217;t ya think?</p>
<p>Or does this only apply to the church as far as your concerned?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l3wis</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/09/800-sd-churches-rally-against-the-1st-amendment-uh-i-mean-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-3151</link>
		<dc:creator>l3wis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=1638#comment-3151</guid>
		<description>Um, did you read my post?

&quot;Churches and pastors can tell their congregations whatever they want to, from the pulpit, the 1st Amendment guarantees that right,&quot;

When they start influencing Initiatives and Candidates in the PUBLIC FORUM they should be considered PAC&#039;s. I see you have been eating that Johnson Amendment crap DooHickey has been feeding you.

BTW, there are churches in SD that are against the ban, and I think the same rules should apply to them.

and, what does Obama and Liberalism have to do with this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, did you read my post?</p>
<p>&#8220;Churches and pastors can tell their congregations whatever they want to, from the pulpit, the 1st Amendment guarantees that right,&#8221;</p>
<p>When they start influencing Initiatives and Candidates in the PUBLIC FORUM they should be considered PAC&#8217;s. I see you have been eating that Johnson Amendment crap DooHickey has been feeding you.</p>
<p>BTW, there are churches in SD that are against the ban, and I think the same rules should apply to them.</p>
<p>and, what does Obama and Liberalism have to do with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikole</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/09/800-sd-churches-rally-against-the-1st-amendment-uh-i-mean-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-3148</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=1638#comment-3148</guid>
		<description>So how come any other non-profit organization in this country can openly express their opinion on politics, but you think the church should be silenced? Is it because they don&#039;t agree with your point of view? What if the church endorsed abortion? What if the church endorsed the liberal views of Obama? Would you be supportive of it then? 

And for the record - the Johnson Amendment is very clear that a church can not endorse a candidate - they can say whatever they want to about other initiatives on the ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how come any other non-profit organization in this country can openly express their opinion on politics, but you think the church should be silenced? Is it because they don&#8217;t agree with your point of view? What if the church endorsed abortion? What if the church endorsed the liberal views of Obama? Would you be supportive of it then? </p>
<p>And for the record &#8211; the Johnson Amendment is very clear that a church can not endorse a candidate &#8211; they can say whatever they want to about other initiatives on the ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l3wis</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/09/800-sd-churches-rally-against-the-1st-amendment-uh-i-mean-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-3064</link>
		<dc:creator>l3wis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=1638#comment-3064</guid>
		<description>Huh? I can&#039;t hear you. My ears are still ringing because the sound guy last night at the show didn&#039;t know WTF he was doing . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? I can&#8217;t hear you. My ears are still ringing because the sound guy last night at the show didn&#8217;t know WTF he was doing . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/09/800-sd-churches-rally-against-the-1st-amendment-uh-i-mean-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-3063</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=1638#comment-3063</guid>
		<description>I thought the gloves had magnets in them... oh wait.. that&#039;s an entirely different rant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the gloves had magnets in them&#8230; oh wait.. that&#8217;s an entirely different rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/09/800-sd-churches-rally-against-the-1st-amendment-uh-i-mean-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-3062</link>
		<dc:creator>lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=1638#comment-3062</guid>
		<description>Velcro gloves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Velcro gloves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/09/800-sd-churches-rally-against-the-1st-amendment-uh-i-mean-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-3060</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=1638#comment-3060</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t there a sheep analogy in there somewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there a sheep analogy in there somewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
