<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why did Measure 11 fail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/11/why-did-measure-11-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/11/why-did-measure-11-fail/</link>
	<description>Editorial Cartoonist from South Dakota</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:48:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: l3wis</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/11/why-did-measure-11-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-5359</link>
		<dc:creator>l3wis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=2333#comment-5359</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to band somebody else&#039;s head against the wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to band somebody else&#8217;s head against the wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost of Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/11/why-did-measure-11-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-5353</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost of Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=2333#comment-5353</guid>
		<description>Nah. The bruise that&#039;s there now would only get bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah. The bruise that&#8217;s there now would only get bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l3wis</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/11/why-did-measure-11-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-5350</link>
		<dc:creator>l3wis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=2333#comment-5350</guid>
		<description>Feel like banging your head against the wall?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feel like banging your head against the wall?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost of Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/11/why-did-measure-11-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-5349</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost of Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=2333#comment-5349</guid>
		<description>Personally, I thought the ban was useless both times. It would have cost us a ton, but prevented approximately ZERO abortions.
The money spent pushing/fighting the bans, plus any potential legal fees from a court battle could be used to fund things that actually prevent unplanned pegnancies and abortions - like good sex-ed, cheap contraception, and fighting to change adoption laws.
The backers of the ban were willing to spend millions of tax dollars fighting the supreme court just to potentially save one baby from being aborted, but I doubt they&#039;d be so generous about funding the things I mentioned -even though it&#039;s proven that they actually reduce the need for abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I thought the ban was useless both times. It would have cost us a ton, but prevented approximately ZERO abortions.<br />
The money spent pushing/fighting the bans, plus any potential legal fees from a court battle could be used to fund things that actually prevent unplanned pegnancies and abortions &#8211; like good sex-ed, cheap contraception, and fighting to change adoption laws.<br />
The backers of the ban were willing to spend millions of tax dollars fighting the supreme court just to potentially save one baby from being aborted, but I doubt they&#8217;d be so generous about funding the things I mentioned -even though it&#8217;s proven that they actually reduce the need for abortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why did Measure 11 fail? &#124; Pelican Project Pro-Life</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/11/why-did-measure-11-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-5333</link>
		<dc:creator>Why did Measure 11 fail? &#124; Pelican Project Pro-Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=2333#comment-5333</guid>
		<description>[...] See the rest here: Why did Measure 11 fail? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the rest here: Why did Measure 11 fail? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l3wis</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/11/why-did-measure-11-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-5292</link>
		<dc:creator>l3wis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=2333#comment-5292</guid>
		<description>I think you are right - You either on one side of the fence or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right &#8211; You either on one side of the fence or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.southdacola.com/blog/2008/11/why-did-measure-11-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-5291</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.southdacola.com/blog/?p=2333#comment-5291</guid>
		<description>I was a little surprised at the numbers this time too. Talking with people this time around, I think several were worried about the troubles the mother would have to go through to prove that she was indeed raped or molested. Many don&#039;t think it would be fair to the mother to put her through the court system and possibly subject her to a long-drawn out deal for something that should be her right medically and was completely against her will. At least if it was completely illegal, women would have their answer, raped or not. Truth be told, I don&#039;t think many cared for the exceptions. It was either all or none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a little surprised at the numbers this time too. Talking with people this time around, I think several were worried about the troubles the mother would have to go through to prove that she was indeed raped or molested. Many don&#8217;t think it would be fair to the mother to put her through the court system and possibly subject her to a long-drawn out deal for something that should be her right medically and was completely against her will. At least if it was completely illegal, women would have their answer, raped or not. Truth be told, I don&#8217;t think many cared for the exceptions. It was either all or none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
