S.L. EHRISMAN (C) 10/24/12 • SOUTHDACOLA.COM

Michelle, you are chair of the SF city council, that’s it. Didn’t you get enough railing about this a few months back? Your two question rule is silly and wouldn’t stand up in a court of law. If councilors are on a line of questioning, why would you cut them off after two questions and break the cycle? When an attorney has a witness on the stand and they are about to admit guilt, does the judge cut off the line of questioning?

I think you are only enabling and assisting city directors to mislead.

(Watch the info meeting where councilor Staggers mocks Michelle for her unenforceable rule)

4 Thoughts on “Two question rule? Poppycock.

  1. Pathloss on October 26, 2012 at 10:47 am said:

    It’s city policy. Want some tea with your chinese communism.

  2. I have two questions for Erpenbach . . .

  3. Poly43 on October 28, 2012 at 9:36 am said:

    Two questions for erp.

    With regards to ALL the economic development going into the stagnant “event” center area. From the paywall leader.

    â–  A $20 million Russell Street project, expanding it to six lanes and adding landscaping, starting next spring, for expected completion in 2014.

    How much did you know about this, and when?

  4. Poly – that was in the works before the EC came up. I remember Litz talking about it when he was still on the council. I think the state is helping to pay for it also.

Post Navigation