S.L. EHRISMAN (C) 10/24/12 • SOUTHDACOLA.COM
Michelle, you are chair of the SF city council, that’s it. Didn’t you get enough railing about this a few months back? Your two question rule is silly and wouldn’t stand up in a court of law. If councilors are on a line of questioning, why would you cut them off after two questions and break the cycle? When an attorney has a witness on the stand and they are about to admit guilt, does the judge cut off the line of questioning?
I think you are only enabling and assisting city directors to mislead.
(Watch the info meeting where councilor Staggers mocks Michelle for her unenforceable rule)
4 comments ↓
It’s city policy. Want some tea with your chinese communism.
I have two questions for Erpenbach . . .
Two questions for erp.
With regards to ALL the economic development going into the stagnant “event” center area. From the paywall leader.
■ A $20 million Russell Street project, expanding it to six lanes and adding landscaping, starting next spring, for expected completion in 2014.
How much did you know about this, and when?
Poly – that was in the works before the EC came up. I remember Litz talking about it when he was still on the council. I think the state is helping to pay for it also.
Leave a Comment