6 Thoughts on “SF Board of Ethics meets again tomorrow at 2:30 PM

  1. Dan Daily on April 23, 2014 at 9:43 am said:

    These meetings are simply a matter of how fast and soon ethics complaints are dismissed.

  2. Titleist on April 23, 2014 at 4:21 pm said:

    That’s because they are frivolous.

    Why do all my comments “await moderation”?

  3. OldSlewFoot on April 24, 2014 at 11:12 am said:

    Titleist said “Why do all my comments “await moderation”?

    DL this has really taken the back and forth debate out of your blog. One of the things that made it interesting.

    I come here much less often because of it.

  4. OSF, sorry buddy, it just has to be that way. I am getting too many threatening and libelous comments that I need to delete. I probably delete about 5-10% of comments. Besides, while I enjoy the conversation and input from readers, I really just want people to have the information I provide. Allowing commenting is a bonus.

  5. OldSlewFoot on April 24, 2014 at 8:44 pm said:

    Nice to have had your blog to enrich myself with your posts and comments from others. But if the main reason I am supposed to come here is to be informed, you fall way short on that. I have had much of the information you post before or within a day or so of your posts. You are not as cutting edge as you believe. We all have contacts in the local scene that privy us to the inner workings of our wonderful city. If you choose this to only be a pulpit, I choose not to come to church. I’ll check back every now and then to see if you quit “moderating”/censoring.

  6. Titleist on April 26, 2014 at 9:53 pm said:

    Before the election I was not allowed to post as follows:

    Bonita Schwann. Proudly representing the 1%.

    Not threatening or libelous.

    It was an opinion that you didn’t agree with. Therefore, you censored it.

Post Navigation