During the Sioux Falls City Council Public Services meeting on Tuesday they will be discussing a total cell phone usage ban (besides GPS and hands free) of course the DOCS are not up yet, I’m sure they will magically appear about 5 minutes before the meeting starts 🙂

During the October ‘Inside Town Hall’ Councilor Erpenbach pushed for the ban and thinks the city council should approve the ban.

Not so fast.

While I am not totally against the ban, and would comply if put in affect, as I have pointed out before the texting ban, that there are laws already in place. In other words if you get in an accident now, while using your cell phone while driving, you can be charged with a myriad of things. Distracted and Reckless driving come to mind. If you kill someone due to your cell phone use, you can be charged with vehicular manslaughter. Like I said, the laws are already in place.

Secondly, I think if the public really supports this, they should put it to a vote. The city council does have the power to put this ordinance change on the ballot WITHOUT a petition drive, and I would support them fully if they put it on the Spring Municipal election ballot.

I have told several councilors that is is ‘above their pay scale’ to put this ordinance into effect on their own without the voters approving it. I have even talked to several citizens who agree with the ban, but agree with me, it should be up to the voters, not 9 elected officials.

Heck, if we entrusted the citizens to an advisory vote on a $180 million dollar Events Center, why not a cell phone ban? I actually think the ban would pass if put to a public vote.

OTHER NEWS

They also introduce the NEW Code Enforcement Manager, Matt Tobias, to Sioux Falls during the show. He actually looked less evil then I expected 🙂 He has a rude awakening though, I wonder if he suddenly disappear after a short stint like our Human Relations director?

FOOD TRUCK SILLINESS

Seems this is coming back to Public Services on Tuesday also. I think the solution is simple. Let them park in public spaces, don’t make a bunch of noise, and clean up your trash.

3 Thoughts on “Safer streets or more unneeded regulations?

  1. Waiting ’til after-the-fact is called BEING “reactionary”. (*I.E., too late)
    Why put up a stop sign there? nobody’s died YET attitude.

    Being proactive – on the other hand – is trying to address a problem BEFORE IT HAPPENS. (getting ahead of the curve).

  2. The D@ily Spin on October 12, 2015 at 1:41 pm said:

    Nothing has stopped me from cell & text. Put your phone in the glove box and use bluetooth. It’s hands free, easier, and legal. This topic gets to much attention from the council. I suppose, because of controlling strong mayor, it’s all they’ve got to do.

    The food truck business should join hotel chains and file one big discrimination antitrust suit against the city. Insiders are using city hall to prevent affordable food options for the middle class. The city has hotels that compete with private enterprise. Discrimination because every city has food trucks and no city has hotels.

  3. Lemming on October 13, 2015 at 12:06 am said:

    The texting and driving law has been on the books now for 18 months? Reality is that its barely enforced. There are plenty of loopholes in the law and every night I drive home from work I see people texting and driving. During your next drive, look left or right at the stop light. The person next to you will be texting. Now, Erpenslop wants to add another ‘feel good, non enforceable law’ to the books? What a waist of debate

Post Navigation