wileys

I watched the city council debate tonight over Wiley’s license;

The Sioux Falls City Council voted to allow the renewal of a liquor license for Wiley’s Tavern in downtown Sioux Falls after more than a half-hour of debate.

City Councilors Greg Neitzert, Theresa Stehly, and Pat Starr visited the popular downtown bar on Friday amid their concerns about the disproportionate calls to Police. They shared their stories, and questioned bar officials about the business and security practices. The Councilors said it was never their intention to pull the bar’s liquor license, but they wanted to use the forum to discuss the bar’s practice of serving patrons alcohol even after they appear intoxicated.

Though councilors Kiley, Erpenbach and Mayor Huether felt the debate wasn’t necessary, I think if a bar has 165 police calls in 9 months, we should be very concerned. Mr. Duncan, the bar’s attorney argued that they get 5x more police calls because they do 5x more business then competing bars. What concerns me more then the obvious over serving is the cost to taxpayers. Let’s say each police call costs us at a minimum $100 a pop, that is $16,500 of tax dollars spent on a bar making loads of money over serving people. How are we making that money back. We are not.

Councilor Michelle Erpenbach called the entire debate an “embarrassment”.

Councilors Stehly, Starr and Neitzert pointed out they were not embarrassed for doing due diligence. Michelle should be embarrassed that while she has been on council she hasn’t done any due diligence. Greg went on to say it was the duty of the city council to review a bar (which is a public place) that has that volume of calls before approving a license;

“The question is why so many police calls?” asked Neitzert.

Pat Starr was also disappointed that there would be no public input and got into with the mayor after stopping the roll call vote by saying ‘Point of Order’.

After a lengthy debate, the Council voted 7-1 to renew the Wiley’s liquor license. Councilor Pat Starr was the lone “no” vote.

The debate ended on a testy exchange between Mayor Mike Huether and Councilor Pat Starr, who wanted to take public input on the matter, but Mayor Huether called for a roll call vote.

The mayor told Pat he has been doing this for 7 years and doesn’t allow public input. Pat told him he disagreed. The mayor hates it when things get ‘messy’ because it makes him look bad. You look bad ‘High Crimes’ Mike because you are neglecting to address crime in our city. I applaud any city councilor that is trying to get a handle on our ‘high crime’ city.

On a separate note, I am also concerned about taxpayers when it comes to Wiley’s hiring off-duty police to be security. The starting pay for officers in Sioux Falls is $49,000 a year. Do they need a part-time job? And if so, should they be running security? I also question how many of these security officers leave Wiley’s at 3 AM after a stressful night, then report to patrol our streets the next morning. How can they do their #1 job if they may be tired and stressed from their part-time job? While I don’t take issue with them having a second job or even their own business on the side, it should be prohibited that they work in a high stress security position. Working for the public’s safety should be their #1 priority.

6 Thoughts on “Councilor Erpenbach, you are the ‘Embarrassment’

  1. anonymous on November 2, 2016 at 6:06 am said:

    The liquor industry wields a lot of power and influence at both the state and local levels.

    Huether, Kiley and Erpenbach all have political ambitions.
    Could it be that they do not want to rock the boat with future donors to their campaigns!?

  2. My Mistake Mike on November 2, 2016 at 7:19 am said:

    Follow the money. It’s an old adage that almost always explains what is going on here.

    Why is Erp embarrassed? After all, criminal activity at this bar has been well document for several years.

    Why does the PIO for SFPD dismiss the numbers by implying these disorderlies will just move on to another bar? I thought he had an oath “to protect and serve”? So who is the SFPD protecting here?

    And you are absolutely right about the blatant conflict of interest in off-duty officers moonlighting at local establishments. This is why many cities forbid such activity within the same community. Maybe this is an issue that Greg, Pat and Theresa can look into?

    Finally, where were the bar owners last night? They sent their lawyer to do their dirty work.

  3. The D@ily Spin on November 2, 2016 at 8:47 am said:

    I suspect Wiley’s will tone it down now that there’s fear of losing their license. I admire how Starr took a stance and held firm. The council works with agreement and disagreement. If all votes are 8 to zero, we need a new council. Isn’t everyone tired of the mayor’s ego? We’ve got ‘one more year of tears’. Send this spoiled brat home and keep him out of government.

  4. anominous on November 2, 2016 at 2:40 pm said:

    I miss the Frontier Club.

  5. The front room or the back room?

  6. It’s funny, because I used to hang out at the Pomp, rarely saw police calls down there. Ma, Pokey and crew would simply grab you by the back of the neck and send you face first through the front door. No need for police intervention.

Post Navigation