The AL did story today about using mediation between neighbors instead of a system of anonymously turning in neighbors for the purpose of being vindictive;

City council members Michelle Erpenbach and Theresa Stehly both see potential in mediation, a process that supplements or sidesteps the courts with negotiation through a third party.

“It takes some of the pressure off of the people that are involved and it creates the opportunities to find out ‘what’s really going on here,’” said Erpenbach. “You can’t force people to be good neighbors, but hopefully we can walk down a path where we can learn to live with each other”

In Dayton, Ohio, there’s a mediation center inside city hall. Larger cities use housing court – which Erpenbach calls “glorified mediation” – as a less adversarial forum to sort disputes between landlords and tenants and deal with code violations.

Stehly thinks a more personal approach could stave off more serious issues in some cases.

“Sometimes when people get boxed in, they’re pigeonholed with their backs against the wall it doesn’t help,” said Stehly, herself a target of overgrown lawn ticketing. Judges in some states won’t set a court date without an attempt at mediation through a third party.

First off, I am a little shocked Theresa and Michelle are in agreement on something (bravo). But they both make a good point. Put our efforts in trying to get along instead of trying to tear each other down.

Now if the city can just figure out how to mow their nasty weeds;

The property across the street from Rick Larsen’s western Sioux Falls home was well kept for most of the 35 years he’s lived there.

But since the city bought the property in 2015, weeds and grass have grown unkempt around the former greenhouse at Madison Street and Harlem Avenue.

The lot has prompted calls to City Hall from neighbors wondering why it’s not being mowed and better maintained.

“Eight inches means eight inches,” Larsen said, referring to the grass length limit spelled out in city ordinance. “The city seems to be the worst slum lord of them all.”

They are a ‘Lord’ alright. Surprised the city didn’t come back and say they don’t have to mow their weeds because they are an ‘Act of God’.

5 Thoughts on “Street Talk #3: June 25, 2017 – No Mow Policy

  1. Theresa stehly on June 25, 2017 at 10:44 am said:

    Argus reporter Joe sneve has a June 23 article…”No mow zones on City property irks neighbors”…a great follow up to this”Street talk”.

  2. Theresa stehly on June 25, 2017 at 11:04 am said:

    Also..Argus reporter John Hult did the story about mediation…fine work John!!

  3. The D@ily Spin on June 25, 2017 at 11:15 am said:

    Diplomacy first. Send out an intelligent polite reasoning code enforcer. People are offended when a big dumb hayseed shows up with threats. It’s the wrong impression that makes and keeps people on the defensive. With a better first contact, mediation may not be necessary.
    The code enforcer that came to my house banged on and blocked the door shut. I have a doorbell and stand back some til I’m sure you’re not selling something. Don’t put your hand behind your back as if ready to draw a pistol. I went to a hearing at city hall where the code enforcer charged at me while giving testimony. If the city can’t control their bullies, I’d recommend a restraining order.

  4. “boxed in, they’re pigeonholed with their backs against the wall”

    Single sentence Trifecta.

  5. It was fun to ride around Sioux Falls with you Theresa. There are so many things to discover and you are always willing to learn. here is the link to Joe Sneve’s story http://www.argusleader.com/story/news/city/2017/06/23/no-mow-zone-city-properties-irk-neighbors/424454001/ .

    There are so many things wrong with the city code enforcers interpret the laws and ordinances. Especially heinous is the way the city attorney keeps breaking the law by encouraging the actions.

Post Navigation