I noticed this post about the Yankton County Democratic Party Chair Candidate forum on Saturday. First I want to say I don’t have a dog in the fight, not only am I NOT a delegate, I’m not a registered Democrat (just a very bitter and cynical indy). I also have no issues with Paula Hawks, though I think the best person for the chair is John Claussen. I think Paula had her shot but screwed it up so badly it should disqualify her. But I wanted to pick apart some of the things she said on Saturday;

Paula Hawks asserted that the party needs to give members something to believe in rather than just issues to fight against. She also said that party lacks a central message and has not done a good job of showing what it means to be a Democrat.

I agree that the party needs a central message like farming, affordable healthcare and better wages but I also think each candidate needs to mold a special message for the district they are running in. I have felt that the SDDP has too often tried to create the message (simplify it) for each individual candidate. This is painting with too broad of a brush. I think the state party needs to concentrate on raising money for candidates and let the individual candidate create their own unique Democratic message in relation to their district, or even the office they are running for (legislator, city councilor, county commissioner, etc.).

Finally, she claimed that the state party needs to do more with both social media and mainstream media to get the message out. She pointed out that many young voters have moved away from Facebook and rely on Snapchat or Instagram and asserted that the party needs to fashion a message to fit those platforms.

This is where the party has been f’ing the chicken for several years. They keep thinking that the only way to bring in younger voters is by posting on Social Media. While it’s ok to campaign on social media (it’s mostly free) you have to tie it in with a strong direct mail strategy and campaign. In fact, several experts who study direct mail found that the younger generation 18-35ish love getting direct mail, in fact they read it more than voters 55 and older (which come in 2nd place) while middle age has continued to be flat.

A variety of studies have concluded that millennials favor and even enjoy receiving direct mail. InfoTrendsconducted a survey finding that while only 26% of millennials prefer email marketing, 38% prefer direct mail pieces. In addition, millennials are more likely than any other generation to read their mail, in great part due to the fact that they actually enjoy receiving mail; in fact, this study found that 25% of millennials consider reading direct mail a leisure activity. The USPS found that 47% of millennials look forward to checking their mailbox each day, which Harris Diamond, CEO of the global advertising network McCann, affectionately refers to as “The Mail Moment.” It’s important that companies attempting to target millennials effectively tap into this moment.

Not only do millennials like to read their mail, but they also pay closer attention to it than any other age demographic. In 2016, the USPS found that 40% of millennials read direct mail thoroughly, compared to only 18% of non-millennials. They also discovered that millennials spend more time reading mail compared to other generations: an average of 9.7 minutes each day, compared to 7.9 minutes for Generation X and 8 minutes for Baby Boomers. These reports illustrate that millennials are extremely likely to engage with direct mail marketing material.

So why is that? Because the younger generation has NOT grown up with mail, they have grown up with social media and phones, they are bored with it. A good, old fashioned direct mail campaign towards younger voters tied into social media and good old door knocking is incredibly effective. It also helps to have definitive voting lists of who actually votes. As Cameraman Bruce would say, “Enough of the Facebook games.” Direct mail works if you work it. Every successful campaign I have worked on used direct mail as it’s central messenger.

3 Thoughts on “Direct Mail still works! Better than ever.

  1. D@ily Spin on March 4, 2019 at 8:36 pm said:

    You’re incredibly studious. I’m looking for what will become the simpler way to reach the masses. The baby boomers (I am one) are dying off. We check our mail for bills, no longer take the Argus, and don’t have a wire line phone. Doesn’t mean we’re modern. Does mean we pay attention. How do you heed the populace? Is it digital billboards, blogs, and Facebook? Kinda, but it’s gonna take shock value. WW2 got everyone involved with radio broadcasts of an attack on Pearl Harbor. Once citizens realize Trump is another word for fascism, they’ll crave information. It’ll be from the internet and a unanimous direction preserving democracy and individual freedom. We’re already one world but our varied cultures require distinctive collaboration. Here, it’s we the people of the United States but it’s time to cull the narcissist anarchist persuasion.

  2. John Kennedy Claussen, Sr., on March 4, 2019 at 9:15 pm said:

    All of my opponents for State Chair are good people with good intentions, but they all rely far too much on the panacea of social media, messaging, and branding to end the malaise of the current South Dakota Democratic Party. Because we will not rebuild the SDDP and begin to win again with a mere obession with social media and or messaging.

    Social media – especially – is merely a tool, but not the only tool, nor the most substantial tool, necessary for Democrats in South Dakota to be relevant again in this state.

    It is time that we see Facebook, Instagram, or SnapChat as merely nouns which describe a medium, or as one of the many means, but not as the all encompassing verb, and thus the answer to our current problems as a political party.

  3. For years I have tried to get politicos to understand the power of data to build a movement. I have looked at the data systems used by both political parties and I would not spend a penny on either of them. The reliance on the current data platforms creates divisions to keep people from talking. It keeps people from solving problems.

    To build a movement you must find what unites us and spread the message through direct contact with the voters who will actually bring others to vote. It is actually simple to do if a party or campaign wants to.

    The Democratic Party must reconnect with their base and build on it through connections. I go to too many political party functions of all types and brands where the attendees are gray hair or no hair. How does this get young people to show up to build a future?

    Find the families who vote and then find ways to expand off of the connections. George McGovern taught me this and we can use computers smartly to reach the potential voters to educate and get them to turn out.

    We’ve been doing this in the background with several successful recent campaigns. It works where Facebook games just fall flat. Facebook, what a waste of time and money. Any time you expend thinking you are going to get a voter to show up is not understanding how to connect with a human being.

Post Navigation