Entries Tagged 'Public Utilities' ↓
April 1st, 2015 — Public Utilities, Public Works, Sioux Falls
Remember when we got over $11 million back for building the levees? This would have been the perfect project for us to spend the money on;
A massive project to replace a sewer line that carries almost all of Sioux Falls’ wastewater won’t cost taxpayers as much after the state approved more than $30 million in low-interest loans to pay for the work.
The 1.25 percent interest loans offered by the state will be paid back over 10 years.
“On that amount of dollars, that’s a substantial savings,” said Cotter, referring to the higher interest rates associated with traditional loans.
Hey Mark, we could have saved 100% if we would have paid for the project with the Levee repayment fund and surplus in the budget. But that’s right, we need to build playthings, they are more important. Maybe the next time the sewer system threatens a backup, we can use the new indoor pool to store all of the sewage instead of Covell Lake or pouring it down residential streets.
If we truly had a mayor who was concerned about prudence, he would have allocated the money correctly and put the pool on hold. But that would take someone who actually cares about the average tax payer and not himself and the special interests.
BTW, I heard the indoor tennis facility’s membership drive isn’t doing so well. Rough road, isn’t it Mike, when you have to spend your own money on play things? Can we get our $500,000K back please?
March 13th, 2014 — Public Utilities, Watermelon
Something ain’t right in the trailer park.
As we first reported Tuesday, the companies managing some mobile home communities are getting rid of individual water bills.
This means everyone pays the same amount, no matter how many people live in their household — a policy that has many people mad.
We spoke to Regional Manager Lynn Granata Wednesday. She sent us February’s water and sewer bill.
It was $8,329.27. Divide that by the number of mobile homes in the Pine Meadows Park and it equals the $55 flat rate neighbors are being charged. She says they’re not overcharging.
Why not just replace the meters? My water bill has never been higher then $14 a month. My highest was $25 before I fixed my leaky toilet. The thing that irks me the most about this is the way affordable housing slum lords screw over their tenants, and not because they are making a little extra money on the side (because as mentioned in the story that is illegal) but by being too cheap to fix an obvious problem with the water meter(s). If someone is renting from you, and paying their rent, you have an obligation to repair things that need to be fixed instead passing those maintenance costs onto your tenants.
July 10th, 2013 — Public Utilities, Public Works, Sioux Falls
Your’e gonna need a bigger boat.
Boy, if City Attorney Fiddle-Faddle didn’t have enough caramel corn to pick out of his teeth with the assistant city attorney’s trouble, now he could be in hot water over how he advised the city council to vote. This isn’t the first time old Dave has been wrong, remember his advice to fire Debra Owen in secret, that didn’t turn out so well. Now the city council might have taken action before they got approval from the Lincoln County Commission;
The lawsuit, a Petition for Writ of Certiorari and for Writ of Prohibition seeks to enforce state laws that require the City of Sioux Falls to obtain approval from the Lincoln County Board of County Commissioners before attempting to annex agricultural land located in Lincoln County at 85th & Minnesota. The Petition also seeks to suspend further action by the City Council to attempt to rezone the illegally annexed property without first complying with state law.
DejaVu. I kind of wondered that when the council approved annexation and thought it a bit strange they would annex the land before getting Lincoln County approval. The city doesn’t have a very good track record when it comes to trumping state law. They have lost several lawsuits that deal with state law. VL casino regulation, red light cameras and the Dan Daily case. I have told several city councilors that they were not going to give up this fight very easily. It’s too bad WM spent all that money sending out postcards, they should saved it for attorney fees, or better yet, paying their workers better.
I think it is about time the citizens of SF revoke the city HOME RULE charter. It’s not working for us, unless of course you are an attorney contracted by the city.
If you want to read the case it is Civil 13-2218 docket number.
June 10th, 2013 — Public Utilities, Public Works, Sioux Falls
Apparently they have trouble figuring out cubic yards. They came by today and this is how they filled the hole in front of my house.
June 9th, 2013 — Potholes, Public Utilities, Public Works, Sioux Falls
Yup, so they showed up on Friday to cut a hole out. ON A FRIDAY! So it could fill with rain for 2-1/2 days before they fill it. That’s planning at it’s finest.
June 22nd, 2010 — Public Utilities, SF City Council, Sioux Falls
Squeezing water from a rock?
Not surprised that this passed the city council last night, but I was a little disheartened that not one single councilor voted against the fee increases;
These and other rate increases are being made to pay for upgrades to city services – such as expansion of the water treatment plant – or to build reserve funds, city officials say.
The utility rate increases, for instance, will generate more than $5.2 million in additional revenue in 2011.
Three reasons why these rate increase SHOULD NOT have been approved;
1) Rate of inflation over the past few years has virtually been nil. A 14% increase seems a bit ridiculous.
2) A rate increase to ‘build a savings account’ during the worst recession since the great depression is unconscionable.
3) Other cuts to city government could have been made to supplement that $5.2 million revenue.
This vote just proves how out of touch our city government is with it’s citizens, but hey, we already knew that.