I can’t believe Kermit was able to be this concise in so few words. Read it twice and make yourself a drink first (From the Argus Leader);
Business activity in Sioux Falls is down, the office building occupancy rate is at a record low, city sales tax revenue is down, unemployment is up, and more people out of necessity are visiting the Banquet and Food Pantry to obtain free food. In the midst of this economic downturn and suffering, city government probably will spend a record-breaking amount of money this year, and next year’s spending on the city’s operations budget will be 4 percent higher than this year.
Sioux Falls 2009 budget is a little over a half-billion
While Sioux Falls has a reputation for being a caring, compassionate community in which neighbors help each other during difficult times, unfortunately, the same cannot be said about the actions of city government.
Yes, it is a caring community. But something I learned a long time ago, two things have factored into this giving 1) Giving money instead of time 2) A tax write-off
During this time of economic recession, city government has placed additional financial burdens on citizens by increasing the sales tax, the property tax, water fees, sewer fees, platting fees, food inspection fees, signage fees, in addition to placing special tax assessments on numerous properties. Common sense dictates that when people are suffering from layoffs, firings and reduced wages, taxes and fees should not be raised but instead reduced or at least remain the same.
In turn, it forces retailers to raise their prices to keep up, which results in higher prices of goods, and higher retail taxes.
As a bare minimum the city should not raise property taxes next year. An Aug. 4 Argus Leader editorial agreed: “The 2010 budget offers a unique chance to hold the line on property tax increases.” Ignoring economic sense and the advice of the Argus Leader, two amendments to prohibit a city property tax increase were not even debated or voted on by the Sioux Falls City Council.
Which was very disappointing. Councilor Costello ‘pretends’ to be concerned about rising taxes and the recession, but when he has an opportunity to stop the silly increase, he is silent. Big surprise. Not.
On the other hand, time was devoted to debating the merits of spending $1,720,100 of taxpayer money on a new golf clubhouse and pond rehabilitation project at Prairie Green Golf Course. An amendment to delete the clubhouse project was overwhelmingly defeated by a vote of 7-1.
I agree with Kermit this is a silly expenditure for a city during a recession, but, the golf courses do make money for the city. But the way they spend those profits are flawed. The golf course should be able to have an endowment to build clubhouses without coming to the city.
Many people wonder why the City Council appears more concerned about spending for a golf clubhouse that would benefit the few, but it rejects any attempt to stop a property tax increase that would benefit most of the city’s population, including homeowners, business owners and renters (who pay the property tax in their rent). Simply, the answer is that the City Council is living in its own artificial world that consists of council members, the mayor, department heads and those individuals who have frequent contact with the city such as developers.
This one sentence alone explains our city government in a nutshell. I am not saying this because I know Kermit. I am saying this because I have seen, and still see the different levels of economic status in our community. A majority of our residents are lower middle-class or below. That’s the facts Jack. When the Gargoyle Leader cheerleads for more minorities and women on the council, they are missing the point, they need more working class, they are the ones not being represented, no matter what color or gender they are. They also need to give the middle finger to the developers and special interests. Government is set up to protect and serve the GENERAL PUBLIC not the RICH PUBLIC, that’s why we ALL pay taxes.
In this closed world, city officials embrace a progressive viewpoint that supports property tax increases each year and the building of expensive facilities such as the golf clubhouse at Prairie Green in order to enhance the city’s reputation for having quality facilities.
Not sure if Kermit was being sarcastic, but I don’t think blowing my taxes on stuff to benefit the Haves is ‘progressive’, as James Carville would say, it is ‘regressive’.
In the City Council’s artificial world, any references to real people being hurt by property tax increases are simply ignored.
They really live in another world, and I am not saying that to bring weight to Kermit’s statements. I watch the council meetings religiously, and I am shocked by the ‘Penthouse’ statements made by our councilors, even by the ones who don’t live in the Penthouse, but aspire.
This includes the real-life story of a widow living in Sioux Falls on a fixed income in a modest 1,000-plus square-foot house who worries that she might lose her home because she cannot afford the annual property tax increases. And there is the example of a single Sioux Falls mother working at three jobs to support her children while also trying to stay in their home despite property tax increases.
One story?! Shit, Kermit, I could tell you more then you want to hear.
In sharp contrast to the Sioux Falls City Council is Rapid City’s City Council staying in touch with the public by voting against a property tax increase. Furthermore, the mayor of Rapid City declared in the Sept. 22 Argus Leader: “We understand that times are tough and everyone needs to tighten the purse strings as much as possible, and I think the city government is no exception.”
I remember reading this and going, “Hank, please send that memo to Dave. PLEASE!!!!!!”
Now is the time for my fellow members on the Sioux Falls City Council to break out of their closed, artificial world and finally get in touch with the real people of Sioux Falls. Now is the time for Sioux Falls to follow the example of Rapid City and stop raising property taxes every year.
Kermit, I like you, and that advice is swell, but it will never happen. Maybe we should invite them to Borrowed Bucks to have a drink and discuss, hopefully the cops won’t have to show up to break up the fight, either way, they know the address.
I’m impressed. At least one someone on the council sees where the city is at and is headed. If you work for the city you have an exorbitant salary and luxury benefits package. City employees and government are out of touch. They view the city from the golf course. Some cities in California have used bankruptcy to escape economic burdens from corruption, foolish projects, and employee packages. The bank that loaned 18 million may never collect. Considering citizen hardships, I doubt anyone will feel sorry for city employee cuts and retirement package defaults. I’m wondering where this mayor will live after his term. He’ll get a pie in the face every time he walks outside. Maybe he could work at Disneyland disguised as a cartoon character.
‘Boris’ from Rocky and Bullwinkel?
I see a unique cartoon characature campaign. Jodi, maybe Natasha and somehow bring in cold war socialism. Have you thought about a regular stint on StopHomeRuleSiouxFalls.com. I’ve kept an option on a billboard west in McCook County along I-90. Coincidence that it is on the way back from Pierre with personal depiction of a certain someone in city attorney’s office depicted as Hitler. Rather than more billboards; a billboard truck (like the Vegas strip) with a regular route through town, about events, past city hall, and around sporting activities. You would be surprised how many people support a non-profit oriented toward exposing the corruption. Of course, the out of state non-profit would be asset value $1 ready to take bankruptcy from lawsuits.
The Roger Hunt approach lives in SD. I didn’t like how it was used but it’s here and available.
You’re on target, but remember two things about Rapid City. 1) the city was on course to raise property taxes until citizens protested. A few council members voted to raise the taxes anyway. 2) Black Hills Power just applied for a 26.6% rate hike on top of the 7.6% rate hike they received two years ago.
One small property tax deferral does not stop the greed, arrogance, or stupidity.
J2-
Thanks for the point. It is good that the people protested. But in SF when citizens protest the councilors do the opposite. Two topics come to mind, Sandford’s the development and the annexing of a street in Litz’s district. Almost the entire neighborhood was opposed to closing the street, so who did the council side with? An out of town business owner.
I noticed the other day when I paid my monthly Argus Leader bill that it had went up two cents from the last several months. I’m assuming this is a tax increase, because if it was an Argus increase I would think it would have been more of an increas.
I think you misunderstood red. They know you post messages on the Argus Leader website and therefore they took the old saying of “offering my two cents” far too literally…. thus you were billed for your opinions.
On the other hand, Sy’s bill actually went down two cents because after reading some of the crap he wrote they decided it was best to send a refund for his opinion.
“Sy’s bill actually went down two cents because after reading some of the crap he wrote they decided it was best to send a refund for his opinion.”
LMAO.
Pingback: Tumor in Sioux Falls is Culprit of over 400 Traffic Collisions, Dozens of Injuries | #DakotaZFreePress