Flagpole Annexation? Literally.

by

So the wise guys developing land at 85th and Audie decided they would put up a flag this is probably in violation of sign code (for it’s size). Apparently now developers are acting like Christopher Columbus to get what they want. Good Grief.

IMG_0643

 

Posted in: Developers, Development, Sioux Falls, Walfart

7 Thoughts on “Flagpole Annexation? Literally.”

  1. Greg Neitzert on September 17, 2015 at 10:23 am said:

    The zoning of that entire intersection with Shape Places is a complete travesty and an outrage. Without going into detail, its wrong on many levels. That’s coming from someone who did, and largely does still support Shape Places.

  2. The D@ily Spin on September 17, 2015 at 10:37 am said:

    Claiming the land in the name of King Huether. The only king I sometime acknowledge is Burger King.

  3. Bruce on September 17, 2015 at 1:15 pm said:

    At 1pm Thursday it is reported the flag is gone. Makes you wonder what happened.

  4. l3wis on September 17, 2015 at 6:48 pm said:

    Was it replaced by a Walmart flag hanging at half-mast?

  5. Enough of shape places and mmm legacy on September 17, 2015 at 7:31 pm said:

    If mmm it’s half assed. I watched the special news event at city hall by Sanford. Sickening to think they poked anything up is colon. Even worse the little m&ms they probably pulled out. Lol

  6. teatime on September 17, 2015 at 10:37 pm said:

    GAWD! Gag me — WM doesn’t really have a flag, do they?

  7. The D@ily Spin on September 18, 2015 at 9:37 am said:

    Whoops, there’s a dozer without ‘Jesus’ on the plow. Call the city snitch line.

Post Navigation