April 2024

ONLY one Sioux Falls Council Candidate understands council powers; Deffenbaugh

The Dakota Scab did a great Q & A with council candidates, this one really was a gotcha question;

Does the Sioux Falls City Council have enough autonomy from the mayor’s office when it comes to policymaking?

Only one candidate understands the separation of powers, and answered the question appropriately, Deffenbaugh;

No. Since we made the shift to the strong mayor model of government where in our mayor serves like a CEO the council has been largely removed from the process of being the cities legislative arm. The Mayor’s vision of ONE Sioux Falls seems to me like a very lockstep mindset that doesn’t allow much room for disagreement or dialogue as a Councilor. I want to see neighborhoods at the forefront leading. I want to listen to the people in our community doing the work on the ground and seeing them more involved in our conversations about governance.

Jordan is correct. The council has the power to work on it’s own thru the legislative process, in fact it is laid out in the charter that way. The mayor’s only duty when it comes to policy is bringing any regulatory items from other departments forward, otherwise his main duty is the manager of city employees and making sure things like streets, fire and police are running well. Jordan is also correct that your councilors are your direct connection to government. As an example, I wanted the E-Bike ordinance changed and I worked with councilor Neitzert to make that happen. Also, the mayor’s office actually put up quite a few roadblocks when Neitzert first proposed the changes, but he kept after it. While it could have been faster, the process still worked and he helped me and many other constituents. Jordan understands that the council is it’s own independent body and they don’t have to give two sh!ts about what the mayor is doing. Besides, as I pointed out above, the mayor doesn’t care about policies that actually help people’s lives become better, he is concerned about if his property investments are making money.

Other candidates seem to be fine with the status quo (which is actually a violation of charter), Thomason thinks the relationship between the council and mayor is just hunky dory;

Our form of government has worked well with the checks and balances in place between the council and mayor.

The ‘concept’ works well, but unfortunately there hasn’t been many checks to that power over the past 3 mayors. The council shouldn’t be the rubberstamp of the administration, and when any councilor has challenged that power they are quickly challenged in an election* and replaced with a rubberstamper like Thomason. While I think Thomason is a good person in general, it seems he is happy about the status quo, not only of our legislature but our city council. We have enough pro-business people on the council, we need some pro-citizens on the council.

*Brekke was replaced by Cole (who never voted in a city election before) and Jensen (who is bailing on a 2nd term) replaced Stehly and we are pretty sure Title IX Plaintiff was recruited to peel votes away from Starr in the school board race. Since she can’t legally serve because of the lawsuit and you know, the perjury thing, twice, it is pretty obvious they don’t care if she wins, just mess with the applecart.

While Renville is pro-citizen and has been active in many advocacy projects throughout our state, she doesn’t seem to grasp what our city government does, this is how she answered the question;

Although, of course, the mayor has last say by way of our current form of government.

No he does not. He may put his John Hancock on documents, but those rules, ordinances and regulations MUST be approved by the city council. The mayor can only break a tie or veto legislation. Not sure what Allison has been told, but the council has the final say and once we get back to a council that understands that, we move our city forward.

VOTE DEFFENBAUGH! Early voting already started at the Minnehaha County Courthouse (all the way to the 3rd floor to the north end of the building, surprised they didn’t put it on the roof to make it even harder to vote!!!!)

I am predicting a runoff between Deffenbaugh and Thomason I also think there will be a recount in the School Board election. I am predicting 14-18K voters in the At-Large race (there will be some variances between At-Large, School Board and NE District). NEW Voter registration has been ‘interesting’ over the past 6 months, and it’s NOT what you think. While this election is pretty dismal (only the school board and at-large is competitive) I think the final results will show us some interesting trends for the primaries and general in November.

City of Sioux Falls to hire a Financial Advisor

I guess the Half-Million+ staff the mayor currently has isn’t cutting it (Item #6, Consent Agenda, Sub-Item, 16);

Professional Services Agreement to Provide Financial Advisory Services, PFM Financial Advisors, LLC, Establish Pricing

So is this about actual financing? Read the agreement;

The purpose of this letter (this “Engagement Letter”) is to confirm our agreement that PFM Financial Advisors LLC (“PFM”) will act as financial advisor to the City of Sioux Falls (the “City”). PFM will provide, upon request of the City, services related to financial planning, budget and strategic advice and planning, policy development and services related to debt issuance, as applicable and set forth in Exhibit A to this Engagement Letter. Most tasks requested by the City will not require all services provided for in Exhibit A and as such the specific scope of services for such task shall be limited to just those services required to complete the task.

If you look further down on the agreement you will see this is about advising the city thru a bond agreement and the advisor gets paid according to the size of the bond. So what is the city planning to bond for? Is this about the convention center or something else? And whatever happened to the policy body advising the city on bonding and finances? Shouldn’t this be coming from the council? Oh, my bad, forgot they work for the mayor now 🙁

PLANNING MEETING HAS SOME INTERESTING TIDBITS

Including a conditional use permit for alcohol on the consent agenda (I think it is just a catering kitchen so there is likely NO alcohol served on-site just used in recipes) but it would be unusual for an alcohol license to be on consent even if it is harmless. Oh, and Mr. Hahn decided to come back to the city to re-zone more of his rental houses into office space. Wonder if he will tell the truth this time or just stack up some more lies. Really doesn’t matter I guess. In this town you can lie thru your teeth to city officials, get caught, still approve your plan, and a couple months later take another shot at it. Can’t make this crap up.