It’s about ‘Mutual Aid’ Stupid

by

FF 7:00

Five city councilors tried to ‘splain away’ why the media is getting it wrong about Paramedics Plus, REMSA and the Health Director, Jill Franken. In fact, Franken was so concerned she didn’t even bother to show up to the meeting, but did supply Council Vice-Chair Erickson a cute two-page letter to read. I guess the six figures a year Franken makes just isn’t enough for her to show up in person and defend herself. Smart move, because anytime you bring up PP to Franken in a public meeting, she sweats like a hooker in church. When she was questioned by council about approving PP as the new ambulance service, she was so nervous I thought she was going to pass out.

At one point in the informational, a long time Democrat, Erpenbach, quoted Trump by saying the media surrounding PP is ‘Fake News’. Even though the term ‘Phantom’ is the language used in PP’s contract and not made up by the media.

Stehly let them have it. First by saying councilors and other elected officials have a right to be concerned and talk to the media about the issue. She also stressed that this was about ‘Mutual Aid’ asking the council to make sure those agreements get signed ASAP.

I also told them at Public Input later that night (FF: 34:30) at the council meeting that it comes down to mutual aid and transparency. Let’s face it, it comes down to PP somehow convincing Metro 911, REMSA and the Health Department that ALL calls and transports need to go to them, and NOT to other ambulances, even if patients have to wait.

So the big question is, how did PP convince Metro and others to abide by that request? I have no idea. But if you get on the Googles you will see why PP is being sued by the Feds in other states, and it isn’t because they ask for things nicely.

I Shocked the Mayor but I did not Shock the Wambulance

by

(Cameraman Bruce presented this video tonight at the council meeting public input)

You hear the darnedest things at Sioux Falls City Council Public Input. July 5, 2016 was no different. Cameraman Bruce decided to present an ambulance problem he had helped a Korean War veteran with.

On June 6, 2017, Bruce finally gets a chance to present this video to the Council and then post this video for all to see.

You know what? A couple of ambulance company audience members were more concerned with boats for sale on their iPad then hearing what Bruce had to say. Then we also illustrate to what extent our administration will go to cover for the ambulance service company in Sioux Falls.

This video is an example of how little regard the audience has for us inputers. We inputers are introducing the Council members in public what many of them will not listen to in private. We try, they fail to listen, we speak in public, they are mad they need to run for cover

Medical board member unknowingly makes case for public ambulance

by

Sumption’s attempt to defend Paramedics Plus may ultimately make the case for a public ambulance;

Police officers, often first on the scene in emergencies, are trained in first aid as well as procedures like CPR, the use of defibrillators and applying strategies to stabilize a patient. Police can assess the medical status of an individual and call in additional support if it hasn’t already been requested or dispatched.

Paramedics Plus, the fourth level of emergency care, provides stabilization and transportation for people who require hospital services.

Notice who the first three entities that are involved with an emergency call are, PUBLIC entities. Metro Communications (911), Police and Fire, all of which are subsidized by taxpayers. So wouldn’t it just make sense for the fourth and final entity to be Public also?

And the argument gets even stronger with this statement;

Sioux Falls benefits from an integrated emergency medical system that not only works very well, but is also very respectful of taxpayers’ money. Sioux Falls spends no city money on ambulance service other than the cost of quality oversight. None. Citizens don’t need to pay personnel or buy, supply and maintain ambulances and facilities. Only users of the transport service are billed as used.

This of course is only partially true. We actually are subsidizing the FOR-PROFIT ambulance service by being the first responders, but are receiving NO compensation for that subsidy.

Our contracted ambulance provider takes on all that expense and risk, while holding the city harmless for any costs.

Who takes on the risk if an ambulance doesn’t arrive but the SFPD and SFFD does? Well your guess is probably as good as mine. We do.

The way the system is set up now, as Sumption described in great detail, taxpayers are subsidizing the ambulance service with NO payback except fines while PP cashes in on the transport. If we went with a public ambulance service through the SFFD at least there would be some kind of reimbursement from patients, Medicare, VA or insurance. Right now we receive NOTHING for our assistance. I actually believe, as Sumption laid out, that if we went with a public ambulance service, not only would it be better and more regulated, it would probably be cheaper (the profit factor would be thrown out) and the city would ultimately be reimbursed for it’s services.

Isn’t it time we sent our FOR-PROFIT ambulance service packing and replace it with a public ambulance service that has a proven record of SHOWING UP?

Quote of the Day!

by

The Argus now is digging around on the Paramedics Plus issue. They received the policy for ambulance dispatch that I also attained yesterday, and it backs up the Phantom ambulance scenario.

Besides councilor Erpenbach’s idiotic statement;

Councilor Michelle Erpenbach, who serves with Barth on the dispatch board, said she was satisfied leaving the matter to the health department and Paramedics Plus.

Of course she is satisfied, because if there is any controversy, it would require her to do work. Besides, she’s busy trying to figure out how to arrest landlords for leaky toilets.

But this quote from PP’s attorney takes the cake;

An attorney for the company replied instead, warning media coverage of ambulance problems could hurt confidence in 911.

YAH THINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!