April 9th in Sioux Falls will be just another ordinary day

Remember the upstanding business owner a few months back who needed to move one of his rental homes so he could expand his parking lot? Well guess what? They have no intention of expanding, and the rumor is they already bought a new building and are moving.
So it seems the secret intent of the property owner was to get this rezoned commercial so he could sell it that way. Which is clever on his part, but not sure I would trust my finances with an individual who can’t even be upfront and forward with government officials when requesting a rezone.
I asked several councilors if there is any remedy to this since he probably lied to the council, planning staff and planning commission about expansion.
NOPE. Once it has been rezoned it is done deal and little Mr. Pants on Fire gets to walk away unscathed.
Sometimes I wonder why people lie about the dumbest things.
It didn’t happen on the big screen, but after the city’s finance director got his ass handed to him by city councilor Pat Starr he grumbled off and several constituents overheard him call Starr a S.O.B. under his breath. Wasn’t there, so I can’t verify that, but it wouldn’t surprise me coming from the children running city hall these days. Someone must have forgotten their Capri Sun before the meeting.
Basically Pat (and over half the council) have been requesting financial statements from the Event Center, Pavilion, Canaries, etc., and those requests go thru the finance department.
The council isn’t looking for final audits and the nitty gritty, they just want to see profit and loss.
I know why the administration doesn’t want to share the info, because they are making oodles of money, shipping those profits out of town, while the oblivious taxpayers of Sioux Falls are sporting the mortgage and maintenance on these facilities to close to around $10-20 million a year (which sucks directly from our infrastructure needs). Don’t be fooled by operational expenses and sales tax revenue, the city throws millions at these facilities in bond payments and maintenance. Just look at the $6 million dollar roof on the Pavilion.
So what do you think is more important? A new ice cooler for the Pavilion or safe de-iced roads?
The Pavilion and Denty are money vacuums and little else. And one of them is named after an accused and aledged pedophile. Oh, and it’s not George Washington.
Think about it, while most of us can’t afford a $200-$400 ticket to events, we still have to subsidize their maintenance, operations, parking, bonds, and the list goes on, yet we still can’t afford to walk thru it’s doors.
I actually used a free pass last weekend to visit the Pavilion’s art center and science center. Um, yawn.
But let’s get to the transparency issue. Apparently the finance director took issue with Starr’s questions, and he should. As a good Dutch Reform Mafia member, transparency is NOT an option, and when councilors are openly talking about your militant rejection of open government, I’m sure you are a bit confused and befuddled.
Sharing information; GOOD!
Hiding Stuff; BAD!
The taxpayers of Sioux Falls fund these facilities, we have a right to know their finances, even if the people asking are Sons a Bitches, because we all know, the peeps that are supposed to be answering these questions are probably of the same ilk, but likely a lot worse.
Here is a link to the testimony (Item #26) and public input, where a council candidate for the NE district, Mr. Jeske, skewers the mayor and his executive staff and salaries.
*Also, if you follow the discussion on the financial information, you will notice one of the finance director’s excuses against delaying a municipal liquor license was because of upcoming scheduled events.
What a gigantic line of BS! First off, it is a municipal license, the city can start or stop that whenever, it is THEIR license. On top of that, let’s pretend we have to wait, these facilities already have active liquor licenses and access, the city could delay these licenses for 400 years and they would still be valid!
I have been (trying) to work with the new City of Sioux Falls city clerk and access to executive orders, but recently he responded to me in an email;
I found out that you can request the Executive Orders through a public records request. Do you have specific ones in mind that you’d like to see?
This was my response;
Jermery,
Thanks for getting back to me.How can I request an executive order if I have NO IDEA what they are? That is why I want to review them, to read them all and see what is on the books. There is no ‘specific’ order I am looking for.When I asked you originally, I told you that the City Clerk’s office used to have those records (because, well, your the city clerk). Why can’t the public access them either online or review them at your offices?WHY?This is public information and should be available WITHOUT a records request.I will work with some councilors to make those available.
As you can see, the new city clerk has NO intention of working with the public to share crucial information. You do know Jermery you work for me and the city council, and the city attorney’s office and mayor are NOT your direct supervisor. You are the CLERK of the city, that means you are responsible for the records of the city and disseminating that information.
And when I try to get help from the assistant city clerks they hide under their desks. Literally.
I’m not sure who is putting the fear of God in city employees, but I am sure they couldn’t hurt a fly (unless they were wearing their man capris.)
If the 7-9% of voters that will vote in the upcoming city election are still undecided, the candidate forums are a great place to start;
Sioux Falls League of Women Voters
School Board Candidate Forum • Wednesday, March 13th @ 6:30pm • Instructional Planning Center • 201 E 38th St.
City Council Candidate Forum • Thursday, March 14th @ 5:30pm • Carnegie Town Hall • 235 W 10th St.
Both will likely livestream on Facebook and Youtube.
These are the best links I can provide;
Councilor Neitzert pretty much summed the city election in this interview (surprised the Argus did a story about the upcoming election, I thought maybe it was too hard of an article for the high school journalist class running the place these days 🙂
Neitzert also said recent concerted efforts to recruit and fund nominees could be “potentially discouraging” to candidates who didn’t have that level of backing.
It’s not potentially discouraging, it just is. Anybody who has the common sense to even consider running for office sees you can’t fight the Poops money machine, so why put yourself out there only to get beat up?
I advise people that are considering running for office, don’t worry about your image, worry about your context. If someone doesn’t want to vote for you based on image, you don’t want their vote anyway.
Shallow people can take a flying . . .