As I have watched this city government over the years, I often get suspicious when they do the exact opposite of what they normally do (Item #31). Usually they rubberstamp developer plans and kind of thumb their noses at individual property owners. Last night they took a left turn, denying a new development;
After being deferred twice over the summer, a proposed 17-lot development is receiving scrutiny after neighbors just to the south feel that they’ve been misled about what would be done near their homes.
“I’m a little confused because I thought the reason this got deferred twice was that Mr. Cooper was working on a solution for our questions and concerns, but I haven’t seen that so far,” homeowner Todd Miller said.
The Canterbury Heights neighborhood has one main road that is used as an entrance and an exit, which both homeowners and city council members see as a major safety concern.
“All of you guys are nice guys and you work really hard and you do great things for the city, but I am so disappointed for how these people have been treated, I can hardly say,” council member Michelle Erpenbach said.
“It’s unfortunate, these homeowners have had to live in a half-developed development, and they’re going to have to stay that way until many years,” council member Greg Jamison said.
On a vote of 1 to 7, the new development was rejected. Neighbors and city council members hope to work together to make sure an additional major access road is added. At that point, the additional development would likely be submitted again.
First off, who is Erpenbach talking about? The developers or the city staff? Probably both. It seems the planning department tried to pull another fast one and ramrod a project through without due diligence, they even roped a city fire marshal into going along with it. No doubt, the council was right to deny this development until the roads are completed to the existing development. A two track dirt road doesn’t count as an access road, in my opinion, only an emergency escape, when maintained.
But there are some factors to consider, and maybe why Staggers voted for the project. As I have said in the past, when you build your home on the edge of the city’s boonies, you can’t expect all the amentities that go with it, no matter what you have been told by the builder. But the existing development was promised finished roads. Here lies the problem. What incentive does the developer have to finish these roads? Will they finish them simply so they can move forward with the new development? Maybe, but that’s a gamble. I believe the city council’s denial only set the taxpayers of Sioux Falls up to finish the roads out there. This could have been solved before it got this far. The Planning Department and Planning Commission could have required the builder to finish roads while building the new development as a stipulation/package. As far as I can tell, that didn’t happen. Maybe I am completely wrong (and often I am) but I think this denial is only going to cost the rest of us, not the developer. Sometimes I feel sorry for the city council, because they are often given very little information before a vote, and when they do vote, it is too late to fix the initial problems with the planned development. We can partially blame the mayor’s office and the departments he manages, but the council should have a little personal responsibility in this by researching these projects before they vote.
Lately I have been watching the Minnehaha County Commission meetings, they operate much differently than the city council. When they need answers they drag the department heads in front of them and ask them. If they don’t have the answers, they defer projects until those departments give them answers. The city council should have done the same, and maybe some of them did, and were misled by city directors hell bent on protecting their own asses and jobs and doing what the boss tells them to do.
This is no way to legislate a city, and last night was proof of it. When government is transparent in their processes everyone leaves happy, the winners and losers, sometimes.
FYI – A major reason the County Commission makes sure to get all the info before they decide on zoning issues is because THEY GOT SUED – and LOST a few years ago when they didn’t strictly follow THEIR OWN RULES in making zoning decisions.
In addition – I’m gonna make a prediction right now that you’re gonna come out completely wrong on this development’s future.
The county can be sued, they’re democracy. City ordinances do not allow lawsuits. It’s a summary violation of the state civil procedures act & the US Constitution.
The development would have been approved had it been a Lloyd Company project.
They’ll ask for a rezone for apartment complexes or another Walmart, then they’ll rezone and fiddle faddle will show up at the news conference with Jeff Schmitt and say its just word play, and or its a loophole. We’ve all seen and heard it all. It will happen like ruf says, sad but true. The 85th and minn mess even with a traffic study the city goofs approved it anyway. Didn’t matter if they only had one lane in and out, they just had dollar signs of 2% sales tax in their eyes knowing platting fees won’t even touch infrastructure costs, ask Kenny Anderson about that fund. They don’t know or even care to know how much the infrastructure will cost. Its just more credit card debt I guess. How come all of a sudden a road access for several houses kills a deal, but there are 3 brand new Harrisburg schools in eye shot of a walmart development and the council doesn’t give a damn, the state doesn’t care, I guess Lincoln county doesn’t give a damn if Liberty gets flooded again and again. What the hell is the standard as to why they killed this, MMM public relations? Can’t be anything else. we have chickens on the council and we have up to six chickens available for every household in town. That makes a lot of chicken *&#@ Let’s hope the hearing on the ballot lies corrects a lot of BS or chicken *&#@ in our town. I would hope our city would look to places like Topeka for proper city governing.
How is it that they (esp Michele) are so concerned for people all of a sudden? They should be concerned about people first, business second. SON was sure shut down pretty fast and even ridiculed. The proposed development @ 85th/Minn doesn’t have two full access points and the plans are for plenty of things there that could blow up and catch fire. I’m boilin’ over on this one, but I am glad for the Canterbury Heights people. What did they say or do that was any different from SON or the people who oppose the big apartments @ 85th/Western or 69th/Southeastern? Is it because they are an older area, compared to a new neighborhood? Makes no sense.