July 2015

Is the Bid Review Board a stacked deck?

Not sure that Rolfing and Kiley should both be on this board.  Probably should only have one on it. To have former council member Jim Entenman (from “one of the 5 who stood together” fame) on this board is a safe play for the mayor. He may as well trade his Harley logos on his truck in for stickers that say “Rubber Stamper.”

Members

Rick Kiley, Sioux Falls City Councilor (Chamber Board Member)

Mark Wahlstrom, First Dakota Title

Jean Hoesing, Ramada Hotel

Nan Baker, Former Sioux Falls Arts Council Director (First National Bank family)

Steve Sanford, Attorney

Paul Schiller, Lawrence & Schiller (Heading up the ‘Arc of Dreams’ fundraising with Sculpture Walk’s Jim Clark)

Jim Entenman, J & L Harley

Rick Knobe, Radio Host (former mayor)

Randell Beck, Retired Publisher from the Argus Leader (Not sure if he is still employed by Avera?)

Tom Bosch, Avera McKennan

Mark Lee, Sioux Falls Area Chamber of Commerce

Rex Rolfing, Sioux Falls City Councilor

Knobe is an interesting choice after the mayor’s past comments in the Argus (forgot the quote but someone just posted the link recently on another SD Cola story) about Hanson, Munson, Knobe, etc.. being investors in projects around the city while they were mayor as an explanation for the mayor’s shady business dealings.

I was especially drawn to this part of the story:

 Huether also wants the committee to look at the potential for using this money to go toward big events, like Jazz Fest and for building projects.”

  “There are these new investments that are being considered. These dreams, like an Arc of Dreams, or some that are already here,” Huether said.   “Those bricks and mortar type projects are very important to the community and they’re important for our growth. But somebody still has to sell the community,” Schmidt said.   Huether says the city will hire a third party to moderate the review committee, which will meet a few times and make its recommendations within a couple of months.

Funny thing is the ‘Arc of Dreams’ head fundraisers Schiller and Clark have said this will be built with all private money, I see their list of donors may be drying up a bit, ask the State Theater how it is going for them. I knew when they announced that project it would only be a matter of time before they came looking to dig their hands in the taxpayer’s cookie jar. Also, does SF really need an ugly shrine that reminds people of a monument in Iraq or of a half-baked version of the St. Louis Arch, the Gate-way to the West?  What will ours be a Gateway to, TIF-ville?

Curious to hear who the city will hire as the third party to moderate the review committee, which will only be meeting a few times before making its recommendations.  Will their recommendations be made to the mayor or to the council?  If made to the council, there doesn’t need to be two current council members sitting on the committee then.

I look for this fund to either be pilfered to cover expenses around the city and for more self promotion of the mayor at the expense of its true intent, promotion of Sioux Falls.

I think the question is, “Can I get a second?”

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2gLPDA36vU[/youtube]

It’s amazing what the Chair of the Sioux Falls City Council tries to get away with when he does not want something discussed. MayorCam was in full force during this presentation and discussion of a simple reconsideration.

We will be going into more detail on the Powder House Road naming question in another video. Keep checking our postings. For now we want to illustrate how the Meeting Chair abuses the process when he does not get his way.

Mayor Huether pulls a fast one . . . again

signs

Before we get to the above graphics, lets talk about the weasel moves by the Mayor. Tonight at the Sioux Falls city council meeting, when councilor Jamison asked for reconsideration of the Powder House road renaming he had to get a 2nd to the motion, the chair of the meeting is ‘supposed’ to ask for 2nd, Huether, the chair, did not, he just stared at his desk, then pronounces “The motion dies for a lack of a 2nd.” Kermit yells out that he will second it, and the city attorney allowed it.

Slippery, slimy move, and really a violation of Roberts Rules. And of course no testimony was allowed because the reconsideration failed, 6-2.

Which brings me to the testimony I was going to give. I was going to ask the council to reconsider calling Minnesota Avenue from the airport to Russell Avenue ‘Universal Peace Boulevard’ and Russell from the interstate to Minnesota Avenue ‘Veterans Memorial Parkway’. My feeling is if we are going to honor those in our country that go to war for us, we must honor those who fight for diplomacy and peace as well.

Second that, Rat Fink Mayor!

85th & I-29 Interchange presentation

Watch all the fun HERE, and my rough PDF document of the slides: 85thex-1-29

It seems a lot of fun stuff came from this, including an ever changing timeline by the city (jumped from 2016, to 2018 to 2020 city participation timeline in 2 short years).

I also seem to think this is kind of strange we would be passing up sales tax revenue by not deciding to annex this until 2020. Can you imagine having several big box stores in an area where no municipal sales taxes apply? So when you go buy a $3000 television you only pay the state’s 4 pennies instead of the city’s 6 pennies? Why would the city pass on this opportunity?

I will tell you why. Pissing matches between developers and those who butter our mayor’s bread. There was a laundry list of big wigs in government and development in the crowd today, guess who was missing? Michael Bender and Michael Huether . . . . Hmmm.