Planning Commission

Is it time Sioux Falls changes the definition of business murals?

mommymural

Sometimes murals are obvious adverts, but sometimes they can be subtle and quite artistic;

“The purpose of the sign code is so people can advertise their business without overdoing it,” Jeff Schmitt of City planning and zoning said.

In other words, Jeff Schmitt with City Planning and Zoning says a business can have a sign, or it can have a mural, but it can’t have a mural as a sign.

“So is it a mural or is it a sign? Art is art, but a sign is what they put in the mural,” Schmitt said.

While I understand the city’s argument on this, I think it is okay for a mural to be an advertisement for a business as long as it doesn’t use words or lettering and artistic in nature, such as this mural is.

Gaddis, who admits she didn’t check City code, spent a lot of money having the mural painted. Now she’s being told it’ll have to be painted over or she’ll face multiple fines until she complies.

Yeah, Big Daddy doesn’t like it when you don’t ask for permission. I think it is time to get more lax on the mural laws.

The Two-Faces of the Sioux Falls Planning Department

augie-luth-sign

Augustana Lutheran’s proposed sign on sleepy Prairie Avenue.

good-news-sign

Good News Church’s proposed sign on a very busy 4-lane, 26th Street.

I don’t need to tell you about the hypocrisy and irony of city government, it’s the reason I blog. But sometimes things stick out like a sore thumb.

Take for instance the city council’s reconsideration of the sign Augustana Lutheran is proposing (Item #21). The Planning Commission voted it down 7-0, the Planning Department also recommended denial, even though only a couple of people in the neighborhood were against it due to ‘distraction and lighting’ issues, even though the church has vowed to not make the sign animated (static changing messages) and it would shut off at 10 PM at night.

But only a month later, look at the Planning Commission’s agenda (Item #6). A proposed digital sign by a church in a residential area on a very busy street. The Planning Commission recommends approval. While I don’t disagree with them, why is this sign OK by a church, in a residential area on a very busy street, but not the very subtle, historical looking, Augustana sign in a residential area?

While I am all for historical neighborhoods trying to retain historical aspects, I also look at two factors; Does the sign at Augustana take away anything from the historical neighborhood or distract from it? Not at all.

Does the sign harm the traffic flow or the historical nature of the traffic flow? Not even close. While Prairie Avenue is mildly busy, I don’t see anyone distracted by a static sign that gets shut off at 10 PM.

Like the code enforcement office, the planning department seems to make decisions based on the influence of certain people with fat wallets.

Hopefully the city council sends the planning department packing and approves the Augustana AND the Good News sign.

Is Sioux Falls Community Development and Fire Department hiding something from the development community?

Many in the development community may already know what that secret is, but, it seems, some do not;

But that’s not sitting well with JDI, Inc.’s CEO Robin Miller, who’s company wanted to build a 12-story condominium, including underground parking and a rooftop garden.

Miller said unlike the two other proposals, which would have maintained the parcel’s green space by turning it into a park, JDI’s plan would have generated $35 million or more worth of construction, brought high-quality architecture to downtown and bolstered downtown’s parking capacity.

If that plan wasn’t good enough for the city, Miller’s not sure what would be.

“When we first went to the city they said ‘We want to see quality construction that’s uniquely special to that site, and we agreed.” Miller said. “When they don’t proceed with what you think is a good proposal … what’s my incentive to make a proposal on something else.”

What many people may not know is that the city may be holding back on projects like this because of the height of the building. Remember the $1 Million dollar fire truck the city had to provide to make sure they could reach the top of the Events Center? Rumor is the planning office won’t allow NEW buildings over four-six stories. It has a lot to do with the airport and National guard base’s proximity to downtown, but it also comes to the fire department not having the equipment to put out fires over 4-6 stories high. The other bank buildings downtown that are over four stories were built before these regulations were put into place.

Let’s face it, we could develop 12-story condos downtown, but if the fire department can’t reach the top in an emergency, we would be screwed.

I wonder if anyone in Community Development or the Fire Department will ever share this little tid-bit with the good tax payers of Sioux Falls? Oh, that of course requires transparency. LOL.

 

Sioux Falls Planning Commission denies Old World/European market concept

euromarket

Forgive me, but the vote count was strange, because they didn’t do a roll call vote, but I think is was (3 Yes, 4 No) Fiegen, Paulson and Anderson were in favor. It seems the chair didn’t vote, which is odd (I will have to look into that when the minutes come out).

The Franklin School has been vacant for quite awhile, so an investor (who coincidentally has a middle eastern name, Qadar Sadat) wanted to convert it into commercial space to set up affordable market space for immigrant entrepreneurs or others that wanted to start markets that would cater to the neighborhood’s obvious immigrant population.

It was denied simply because of the argument that it didn’t have enough parking spots, and a concern that it would be zoned commercial. A commissioner in favor of the rezone pointed out the parking needs would have to met after the rezone and before the remodel. As for the argument of commercial, it was pointed out by the realtor of the property that apartment buildings in these kind of buildings isn’t a concept that has worked well in Sioux Falls. As for the argument of commercial, the building sits on North Cliff Avenue & 3rd street, very appropriate for the area. Ironically this argument comes from a commissioner that has no problem with building an 85,000 square foot, 24/7 Walmart next to an established neighborhood. Let’s talk about what is ‘appropriate’. Also, only ONE person in the neighborhood showed up to say he was against the project. The realtor said that they had a neighborhood meeting and no one was opposed to the project, they actually looked forward to it.

I really think this denial was due to the fact it is the Whittier Neighborhood, a place that only seems good enough for homeless shelters, low income housing and the Banquet. This was a slap in the face of our immigrant population who wanted something for themselves in their neighborhood, and quite frankly good for the whole community to have such a diverse retail center.

Of course I don’t know all of the details, but I think this would have been a cool concept. Once again, some on the planning commission don’t vote reality, just what the planning department asks of them (they recommended denial).

WE ARE GETTING ANOTHER BREWERY!

beeryum

But in good news, the commission did approve another brewery in Sioux Falls. A former brewer at Wooden Legs Brewery in Brookings is opening the facility. Cheers!