Planning Commission

Another suit against the city over property rights. Yawn.

Untitled-8

This is beginning to become so boring and prevalent, I may just need to take a nap. Wait! That’s what the building services department do all day, then their boss knocks off at 3:55 PM on Fridays to have a nice micro brew.

City Attorney Loop-Hole David Fiddle-Faddle, of course clears it all up for us;

The city was served with the law suit late Wednesday and was “still digesting” it Thursday afternoon, City Attorney David Pfeifle said. He described the issue as a dispute between neighbors with the city caught in the middle.

Better get some antacids. Caught in the middle? You are the ones to issue the permits, you are the governing body. You know that? Right? Dave? This isn’t about a ‘dispute’ this is about the city not doing their job correctly. Oh, and the irony of the health system that the doctor building the home works for . . . I ask, would Dr. Annette Bosworth be allowed to build a home that didn’t follow code?

All Saints Neighborhood crying about nothing

Touchmark has been trying unsuccessfully for years to expand on the corner of 18th and Phillips. The neighbors claim that it would ‘ruin the neighborhood’ and historical aspects.

First off, without the most obvious argument, Touchmark owns the land. Yeah, Yeah, I heard the same with the Walmart issue, except, Walmart DID not own the land, they only had an agreement to purchase, not even sure if they have bought it to this day.

Also, it seems besides a few nit-picking neighbors, the historical preservation board seems to be the only ones objecting, and they truly are powerless and advisory in nature. The Planning Commission and City Council CAN ignore their advice, and should.

Other then that, I actually think a building on that corner would be an improvement. I drive past that intersection a lot, and I have yet to see anyone utilizing the land for recreation that live at Touchmark. In fact, I have never even seen a groundskeeper in the grove of trees.

Touchmark owns the property, and the expansion would improve the lives of their residents. Stop crying about a couple of trees and let them expand.

What?! I thought Shape Places was perfect? Why do we keep making all these adjustments?

As I have said all along, this gigantic ordinance change should have been broken down in sections for the council and public to pass, instead, like most things with this administration, they needed to ram rod it through all at once. I encouraged people to vote down Shape Places in the past municipal election not just because of Walmart, but because it had several flaws, that needed to be fixed in sections. Of course, the voters didn’t understand that, so here we are (Full DOC: billboards);

WHEREAS, the City hereby exercises its authority under SDCL 9-29-1, SDCL Ch. 11-4, and the City Charter, to establish an immediate and interim moratorium on the installation of any Billboards or the issuance of any permits for Billboards within the City;

WHEREAS, an interim moratorium will ensure that any proposed zoning ordinance changes and any proposed amendments to the City’s 2035 Comprehensive Plan can be completely examined with adequate public input from citizens, business interests, and sign industry representatives;

WHEREAS, the City finds that an interim moratorium period of 180 days is reasonable to preserve the status quo and prevent significant investment pending the outcome of the above study and any proposed regulations emanating therefrom;

WHEREAS, the City finds that an immediate and interim moratorium is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; S:\AS\Clerk\ORD\ord0034.docx 2 3/20/15

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, SD:

Section 1. Interim Moratorium.

The City shall not accept or process applications, issue permits for, or allow the installation of any Billboard for a period of 180 days, or sooner if this Ordinance is repealed by the City at the completion of the above study.

This part is my fave,

“an interim moratorium will ensure that any proposed zoning ordinance changes and any proposed amendments to the City’s 2035 Comprehensive Plan can be completely examined with adequate public input from citizens, business interests, and sign industry representatives”

Didn’t we do this before it passed?

Apparently not.

Mega Pawn Shop Re-Zone approved on consent agenda

While I got my popcorn out last night ready to watch another exciting city meeting (Planning Commission) I was surprised to see that Item #6 was pushed to the consent agenda and NO discussion or Presentations were made before the commission voted to approve the rezone of land that will be used for Badlands Pawn. While I don’t see any opposition to the rezone, I guess it would have been nice to hear a little bit more about the project before it got moved to the City Council.

Re-Zone on Holly Avenue

holly

The ‘100 Eyed Spaghetti News’ did a story today about the rezone to commercial property on Holly Avenue next to residential. You can read all the juicy details here (Item #25).

I really don’t see an issue with the rezone, and if I was sitting on the council I would vote to approve it. While it is close to residential housing, you must realize it is only a block off of 41st street. I have friends who live 2 Blocks North of 41st street near Western Avenue, and I don’t think they have ever seen any bad effects of retail near them. In fact, it is a pretty quiet neighborhood.

What I found ironic about the rezone was the petitioner, Lloyd Companies and councilor Erpenbach’s reaction to the rezoning proposal;

That’s probably true, Erpenbach said. But she wasn’t picking up that sentiment in any of the letters she was reading on this issue.

“For now, I take the other side of the fence,” she said. “There are people living there, and continue to live there, and they would have to put up with the construction and the additional traffic. I want to hear from them. We need to hear their voices.”

Michelle, should I laugh now, or wait until you vote for this tonight? One of your largest campaign donors, Lloyd is asking for a re-zone, I’m pretty sure you don’t give two snits about what the residents think. We know the only thing you listen to is the sound of a check being signed by another developer donating to your campaign. You will vote yes tonight after you explain to us how you are satisfied with the fencing, berm and buffering. Do you need me to write you the script? I can email it to you?

I also find the Lloyd connection interesting because they are requesting they encroach into residential to expand retail, yet when Lloyd received a TIF downtown for condos and retail, he had to change it to all condos and no retail because retail just couldn’t be supported at that complex.

You know what, I think I just changed my mind, I don’t think any residential should be rezoned to commercial in this city until we have filled all of the other vacant retail space in town. Of course, that would require developers to get more creative, and who needs creativity when you can just donate a couple of grand to a councilor’s campaign, it’s a much easier and cheaper way to go.