The gutless, anonymous, empty threats, weasel, gun-for-hire at NvsHS calls this video “Democrat Congresswoman Stephanie Herseth Sandlin Chewing Out her Challenger’s Supporter”
I watched this five times and turned the volume up all the way. Didn’t hear what Steffy said to this lady, and in Steffy’s defense the lady is wearing a Noem shirt, so who threw the first punch? Let’s guess.
Nice editing though, weasel.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvCekcGl85o&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]
Well, that little old lady is me! And I didn’t consider myself old, but….
Anyway, I asked her after the debate if she was going to vote for any of Obama and Pelosi’s attempts during a lame duck session, and her response was the typical fence-sitting, finger-in-the-wind answer. “I will always do what is best for SD!” Well, it is no longer only okay to always do what is best for SD; sometimes a congresswoman has to do what is also best for the entire nation. So, in other words, she will vote however Pelosi needs her to.
BTW, I had tried to ask her the same question at the Sioux Empire Fair debate but she completely ignored me several times, instead only talking to her obvious supporters. She wasn’t happy to talk to me this time either, especially as this time I had the Noem t-shirt on, but news flash, she represents every voter in SD, not only those who support her, we all pay her salary, and we all deserve equal respect. (Even to an “old lady!”)
Correction to above – “attempts during a lame duck session to pass major legislation such as cap and trade (tax), card check, amnesty for illegals etc,”
And she clearly did not want to talk to me. Her advisors were pulling her away even as she was answering me, as is shown in the video. But little old ladies can be persistent!
other than saying “nancy pelosi”, “national debt”, and “obamacare”, what exactly does “your gal kristi” actually have to say that isn’t taken verbatim from the republican strategy cue cards? and will she vote to raise the speed limit so we can drive like her? i don’t know about you, but i haven’t gotten 3 million in federal subsidies (which contribute to the debt kristi hates so much) to help pay for my higher insurance rates.
Scott:
You are the same guy who we pointed out as having committed libel earlier this year, are you not? Then, after we pointed this out, you hurriedly pulled down the post. So, first of all the weasel here is the person who commits libel on his website and refuses to apologize.
Second of all, I bet you just about crapped your pants when that lady in that video responded to your ad hominem attacks on the NvHS team.
Now, let’s gets down to the issues…fact of the matter is that Herseth Sandlin refuses to answer that lady’s question and refuses to answer whether she will continue to support Nancy Pelosi and her agenda.
In our estimation…there are two weasels here…they guy who commits libel on his site and the gal who refuses to tell voters who they will support as Speaker of the House.
That’s always been my point. Noem has given me no reason to vote for her.
It seems clear when someone is sporting a Noem shirt they have no interest in actually hearing Herseth-Sandlin’s opinion on the issues as their mind is already made up. Instead, this was just an attempt to cause friction and create controversy, and I don’t blame Herseth-Sandlin for walking away.
By the way “proud jack”, Herseth-Sandlin has already voted against cap and trade and shows no signs she would flip-flop on the issue. She also went against her party and voted for increasing border security, and again there is no reason to suspect she would vote for amnesty for illegals as it goes against her prior record.
You state Herseth will vote how Pelosi needs her to, which suggests you rely upon assumptions rather than facts. Again – why bother speaking to Herseth-Sandlin if you are so intelligent you already know how she will vote? The facts don’t support your position however, so take your free tshirt and move along.
NvHS –
Wasn’t a bit surprised a Noem supporter came to my site and spewed their bullshit. How do I know this is what she asked? Because she said so? Yeah, I’ll believe that one. It is clear your audio is garbage, you could insert any question you want.
And BTW, when Noem was asked who she would vote for, she first had to get permission from her campaign manager then still didn’t answer the question (This audio is clear). NOT voting for Pelosi isn’t an answer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ogyoEm2Sa4&feature=player_embedded
And BTW, while we are at asking questions, when are you going to tell everyone who you are and how much the Noem campaign is paying you to be a weasel for them? See, because that’s what weasels do, profit from hiding in the shadows being a weasel. Weasel.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=weasel
Definition #2
“A cunning, sneaky person. On internet forums they are often a liar, fake or poser. Will try to extract information from you to share with others and / or use it against you. Uses shiftiness to evade an obligation, commitment or duty.”
Well, typical Dem calling me an outright liar. That is exactly what I asked her, and this video caught the very end. Her handlers were trying to get her away from talking to anyone.
Yes, I had a Noem shirt on this time. I had tried to talk to her at the SF debate and at that time was NOT wearing a Noem shirt, which I stated before, and she ignored me completely.
I can’t make you believe me, but this is exactly what happened. You can call me a liar, doesn’t bother me because I was there. You weren’t. Typical Dem blogger.
I’m glad you had a shirt on.
Me too.
PJ – Maybe you did ask her that, maybe you didn’t. Who cares. Stupid question. My point of this blog post was simple; Nobody knows what you asked her because the audio is unclear. As for calling me a ‘DEM blogger’ LMAO. I have been a registered indy for years, and though I may vote for Dems more then Repugs, remember this ‘Dem Blog’ was dedicated to getting a Republican elected mayor of our city not to long ago, and guess what else? I didn’t receive a dime to do it. And BTW, I voted for Marking in the house race. We need to stop Noem at all costs, indies, dems and repugs.
I am a Republican who is NOT voting for Noem. The lady is a nut job who is filling the airwaves with dishonest propaganda. There is suppose to be a list of Repubs. that are voting for Stephanie coming out soon. Should be interesting to see who is on the list.
Larry, Curly and Moe?
The video doesn’t show anything. You can’t hear what’s going on.
Noem and the other repubs have weak cases to vote for them when all they can say is Nancy Pelosi. I guess everyone is suppose to run and hide when we hear that name. If they want to get elected then state their reasons to vote for them. Quit shouting Nancy Pelosi.
That’s what I’ve been saying all along, Helga. It’s a puzzling campaign plan. Those that believe that Pelosi is the root of all evil are already voting for Noem. She needs to convince the independents and those Dems not happy with Stephanie that she is the answer, and the constant Pelosi rants are just turning them off.
Noem says “Pelosi.” Herseth-Sandlin says “lawbreaker.” It’s all bullsh##, offering little meaningful information showing why we should vote FOR them, instead of voting AGAINST the opponent. The only question is, whose buillsh## do we want to smell for the next 2 years. I’d really like to see a solution; for example, more of us getting informed and involved, and less of us being sheep who can’t comprehend anything beyond the sound bite. Question is, how to convince us to get off our collective couches, or if not that to tune in to informational programming instead of ‘America’s Biggest Dancing Bachelor Doofus Gets Fired by Ozzie Osborne.’
Dukembe- I like that show.
I stumbled on this exchange–I seldom go to this blog because I don’t like the usually nasty language-but I stopped in after last night’s debate.
When I saw the video I thought “Oh that’s _____, I didn’t know that anyone caught that on tape. I remember her telling me that she tried to talk to Herseth at the Sioux Empire Fair but she was completely ignored. Later she did get to ask about legislation during the lame duck session after the Dakota Fest debate. Then I read all the comments and wondered once again why I ever read this blog. At lest the language was most clean on this post.
“I seldom go to this blog because I don’t like the usually nasty language-but I stopped in after last night’s debate.”
Yeah, right, you wingnuts can’t resist coming here, just admit it. And what do you have against the 1st Amendment?