‘I haven’t done much over the past 8 years, put I can sure run a meeting.’

It’s hard to explain all the stuff that happened in a few short sentences;

• Mayor thinks he should have his own legislative priorities

• Former Fire Fighter, Councilor Soehl, doesn’t understand public safety for dignitaries

• Mayor and the Count think they are going to fix the childcare crisis

During the informational meeting the council (our legislative and policy body) brought their 2024 legislative priorities forward. This one is baffling to me;

The Sioux Falls City Council opposes any legislation that would reduce or repeal any
municipal or county tax.

One of the duties of our council and mayor’s office is to be fiscally responsible with our tax dollars. That would mean trying to find ways to CUT taxes (and expenses), not find ways to protect these HIGH taxes. I have never heard of a politician promising to keep our taxes high.

The mayor also brought forward his own legislative priorities which as the council points out, not necessary, because they should have joint ‘policy body’ priorities. What does it tell the legislature when the council has different priorities then the mayor’s office? It says they are NOT working together (which is totally obvious and why I have encouraged the council to hire their own executive assistant/paralegal and council attorney so they can write policy without interference or blockage from the mayor’s office).

One of the mayor’s priorities was regulating autonomous vehicles. With all the issues we have in this city, he taught this was worthy of mentioning? I agree, they will need to be regulated, but that is a state DMV issue. Does he even know he is the mayor of Sioux Falls?

Councilor Jensen (who decided to show up today) talked about how him, the mayor’s office and the legislature will forming a task force to fix the childcare crisis. I laughed so hard I almost fell down. So the mayor who handed the mentorship program over to the HelpLine center (and they are struggling to find volunteers) and Jensen who is walking out the door after one term (his only purpose was to cock block Stehly) and the legislature who gave us a whopping 3 points of a penny tax cut is going to come up with a child care solution. BLAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I bet a pre-nap meeting at EMBE would be more productive.

I can almost hear Poops first suggestion, “Maybe kids just need an adult to do jumping jacks with them?”

Even Jensen’s comment (paraphrasing) ” . . . We are going to study this so we are not going to just throw money at it . . . and after we study it, we will put money towards it.”

Huh? So it is only worth throwing money at when it is your idea?

I sometimes wonder if Jensen’s brain is just one big popsicle?

It got even better at the city council meeting;

During the discussion on moving Metro 911 employees to the city’s employment umbrella (Item #23) the HR Director, Bill Da’Toole, said that once they become city employees on January 1st, they will become civil service employees but they will have to form their own union. Granted, the HR director did say they would help them thru the process (you know, under a very ANTI-UNION council and mayor’s office). The council asked why the union wasn’t formed in advance (since the process will take 8-9 months). These city employees will have NO union representation for their first year of employment and will probably struggle with negotiations in 2025. I have a feeling the administration may use this as a way to start chipping away at the other unions. If they can convince the 911 employees that they would be better off without a union they could be the outlier. I encourage ALL 911 employees to support unionization, without it, you are NO better off then you were under the old system because if you think Da’Toole, Mayor Poops and (some of) the City Council have your back, you are sadly mistaken.

I could criticize our local Union leadership(?), but without them, you are screwed.

During the discussion on Ethics ordinances (Item #24), Neitzert who is sponsoring the legislation, offered an amendment;

In furtherance of this section, city council members may attend conferences or events affiliated with a political party, and may hold appointed or elected positions within their respective political parties, including, but not limited to, precinct officer or delegate to party conventions. However, in no case shall city funds be expended for any event or activity organized by a political party.

Greg mentioned a constituent asked him to add this (it was likely me) even though I would have probably written these changes completely different. While it adds a little more teeth, Councilor Soehl was NOT happy about this amendment and asked (paraphrasing); “If Jill Stein from the Green Party came to Sioux Falls for a rally and our police department offered escort, would they be in trouble?”

Soehl should know better, as the former SFFD Union President and a retired fire fighter officer, the reason police protect dignitaries isn’t just for the their protection but for the protection of the public attending the event. DUH! FK’ING DUH!

Also, as written, and as Greg pointed out to Curt, this is the ethics cannon of the mayor and city council (elected positions) and does not refer to city employees.

But hey Curt, if you like Jill Stein, feel free to party with her, just don’t let her pay for the drinks.

One of the funnier things that happened tonight was the council getting all butt hurt over the mayor naming the 6th Street Bridge the Unity Bridge (Item #25). Soehl deferred the item for two weeks because it seems the council is not to happy about the mayor naming the bridge without council input. It passed 7-1 (Merkouris who sits on the naming committee was the dissenting vote)

The irony of calling it the Unity Bridge isn’t lost.

In other tidbits, during the informational, the council discussed getting state law changed so they have the ‘option’ of shipping the Delbridge Collection to another entity in another state who wants to preserve the collection. As I have said all along, that has been my biggest concern. I could care less if I see a bunch of dusty old monkeys and goats, but they need to be preserved for scientific and historical reasons, and to be honest with you, I think it would be in the best interest of this collection to get the Fc’k out of Dodge before one of these Clems turns the collection into hood ornaments.

I also was told recently the new power and light facility being proposed by the mayor’s office is mostly just an empty pre-fab warehouse. So if that is the case, why doesn’t the city just buy an existing warehouse and retro-fit it? We blow money on the dumbest crap.

I will leave you with a positive note. I have been kind of hard on Councilor Selberg over the past 8 years. I don’t have anything personal against him, I just think as a local elected official he is incredibly lazy. BUT, he has been chairing quite a few meetings lately and I told another city councilor after the meeting tonight that ‘Marshall does a nice job running the meetings. He doesn’t interrupt folks, he always accommodates new speakers, and generally he keeps the drama to a minimum at the meetings, because he offers no drama. Can we just hire Selberg to chair all the city council meetings moving forward over the next 10 years? Everyone has their unique golden parachute.

4 Thoughts on “Sioux Falls City Council bangs out another confusing meeting(s)

  1. Very Stable Genius on December 6, 2023 at 8:36 pm said:

    Selberg has been rather quite over the last eight years, but I do remember him being rather vocal during the dispute involving the city run golf courses a few years ago.

    But personally, I had a good experience with him. Four years ago, my neighborhood, or actually the street in front on my house, had seven car accidents experienced in close proximity to my house. Now, keep in mind, these accidents happened at uncontrolled intersections, but after I reached out to Selberg, the Mayor, and then Chief Burns, and with a few emails going back in forth, I was successful with their help to get some stop signs put-up in our neighborhood; and since those new signs went up, I’ve seen car accidents near my house go from 7 in ’20, to 1 in ’21, and none that I know of in ’22 or 23. So, my point is, that I’m thankful for Selberg’s help with this issue and it demonstrates how sometimes for government to work it takes civil discourse between citizens and political leaders to get it done.

  2. D@ily Spin on December 6, 2023 at 10:20 pm said:

    It seems to me the mayor and council stay busy looking out for themselves. What about the 199,000 they were elected to represent? Even so, there’s no ‘Unity’ at Carnegie. Why not name the bridge for its purpose? ‘Trail of Tears’, because it’s how to get from slums to sell blood at the blood bank or get to the courthouse to apply for welfare. It cost to much but it’s what the mayor will pay to piss from height into the river.

  3. rufusx on December 7, 2023 at 9:03 am said:

    Being a knee-jerk advocate for ALWAYS cutting taxes – without regard to actual fiscal analysis of societal NEEDS from government is an EXTREME conservative position. It is a basic underlying tenet of the whole grievance culture that is the cultural power behind Trumpist MAGATry. It’s also a typical position of backward small-town/farmer SD ideology, not sophisticated Urbania, and easily demonstrated as obvious hypocrisy whenever government money for anything is needed for farmers and backward little towns. So, there’s that to think about for you.

  4. ruf, I would agree, but it is pretty obvious to me with all the play palaces we build in SF that we are overtaxed. I don’t care what political stripe you are from, a main duty of ANY elected official is to spend our taxdollars wisely.

    This has nothing to do with regular sales taxes anyway. City Hall and City Council have expressed on numerous occasions that they don’t want their sales taxes on groceries taken away. Unfortunately it may not be up to legislature, the voters will vote overwhelmingly to eliminate the food tax and the mayor, council and the screwballs in Pierre can’t do much about it.

    Any and all government bodies should always be looking at taxation and the structure of that taxation. That is why I have said the city needs to do a zero sum budget every other year instead of just an inflationary increase.

Post Navigation