Democrats

Post-election thoughts by Guest Poster

This Ellis rant has me going and I wanted to keep it handy for the future.  The lawyers do not like this decision by the public.  The governor does not like his pet projects failing. How dare the public tell the government what to do.  If we the public, to do not vote the way the vested interests or their protégés in positions of power want or get swatted down by the public, we are uninformed or worse, dumb.  If the people in power or money do not want us to vote down their pet projects, they better get out their voters and not just rely on the paid advertising to coerce us.

We had the chance on election day 2012 to let 7 ill-conceived issues become the law of the land.  The people of South Dakota even surprised me with the votes recorded.  The worst of the worst went down to defeat.  As Lewis responded, my faith has also been restored.  These were primarily ALEC model legislation items defeated, excellent!

Now consider the failure of most of the Democrats.  It was not a failure of the candidates by and large.  It was a failure of the process the Dems have been using for many years.  Believe or not, the deficit of registered Dems is not a big deal.  The problem is the losing process the Dems have been pursuing.  The lack of a long range cohesive vision to present the voters is showing.  At some point the Dems have to quit being GOP-Lite and actually stand for something.  The voters want and crave some vision to vote for and not just be against everything the MSM ‘reports’ out of Pierre and Washington.  The voters want to be guided to the polls and they want to vote for something.  How sad it is the Democrats did not even try to get out the vote with carpooling on the reservations.  What a waste of great issues and great candidates by not physically supporting them.

So now we political geeks look forward to 2014.  Do the Democrats look forward with trepidation or excitement?  The party does not want to look to the past for inspiration on how to win in the future.  The cool things like social media are not ever going to win elections.  Social media is only for keeping your troops going, it will never win new converts.  New converts only come by pressing the flesh in person.  It has been proven by results for the last 34+ years of Democratic defeats, cool modern media processes do not win in a small vote state like South Dakota.  When was the last time you saw a major grassroots, get out the vote effort in South Dakota run by the Democratic State Party office?  Maybe 1974, probably 1972.  We old-timers who know what it feels like to have a real Democratic Party in action are disgusted by the way the party was taken over by consultants and political hacks who pack up their ditty bags when they lose.  They pack up the voter lists, the organization and the money as they leave the state.  Look at the wasted effort spent on Obama for America.  When they left the state to more fertile pastures, we in South Dakota no longer had any organization to continue the effort to identify, then get out the vote.

Look at the undercurrent of dissatisfaction presented by the voters of South Dakota.  These voters could be educated and organized by the Democratic Party for a lot less than the ad buys recently made.  These voters will turn out to the polls because the party kept track and helped them feel vested in the process.  The SD Dems do not even try.  When will they try?  The cute saying Will Rogers was fond of “I don’t belong to an organized political party; I am a Democrat” doesn’t mean Democrats should not organize.  It means Democrats are a coalition of many groups who are striving to be better.  In my experience, Democrats by and large are not Kool-Aid drinkers, but people looking for the positive vision.  The state party needs to quit wasting candidates, money and voters playing games.

State Democrats have a candidate in Senate District 6

Richard Schriever filed today at the State Democratic HQ to run for SD Senate District 6. Richard’s motto will be “A Balanced Perspective.” Richard comes from one of the founding families of the area, having lived and worked in every community in the district, having been both employed and an employer, having done the hard manual work of farming and construction as well as holding advanced degrees and working with the highest level executives at major multi-national corporations.

Richard says this;

I am a native of Tea, grew up in Tea, Sioux Falls and rural Harrisburg and am a graduate of Lennox High School.  I am an alumni of USD and Augustana College, and hold an advanced degree from a California School. I have been a small business owner and manager both in South Dakota and California and have consulted to major US and international companies, but I have also been a farmer, a welder and a bricklayer.  I currently live in Lennox, SD, where I have chaired the Planning Commission for 5 years.

I believe I will bring a well-rounded and balanced perspective to Pierre as your senator from District 6.  My goals in Pierre would be to assure that the people come first, and not just one point of view or another, but that everyone is equally considered. We need to move the state forward in a fair and transparent way.

Karma is a bitch

No surprise here that the bottom is falling out of the SD Democratic party (okay, it fell out a long time ago, but this isn’t helping);

In District 6 Senate, Dick Gors has withdrawn from the ballot.

In District 10 House, Barb Kavanaugh has withdrawn.

Keep encouraging people to support Republicans, like De Knudson, and you will keep disenfranchising your party members. Get behind candidates from YOUR party, and give them FULL support instead of messing around with faux-republicans.

Haven’t you learned your lesson yet?

 

My suspicions about the SD Democratic Party trying to assist municipal candidates are confirmed

As I have reported in the past, the SD Democratic party got involved in municipal politics.

But before we dig into the article, I want to commend three people for coming forward;

• Ellis for working hard on this story for weeks to get it out in the mainstream media

• Ben Nesselhuf, chairman of the SD Democratic Party for finally being honest about their involvement (though I do not agree with it).

• Kyle Vanderlinden for telling his story;

In the weeks leading up to this year’s City Council elections, the top official with the South Dakota Democratic Party and Mayor Mike Huether met to discuss the four races.

The meeting lasted about 45 minutes. They talked about family, life and other topics. But they also addressed the upcoming campaigns.

The party was interested in helping Democratic candidates, a step in building the party and grooming candidates who, once successful on the local level, might have a shot at higher office. But first, Democratic Chairman Ben Nesselhuf wanted “to make sure we weren’t stepping on any toes” with the mayor.

Nesselhuf said the meeting was a “courtesy call” to ensure the party’s participation in the races was OK with Huether.

Also present at the meeting were Zach Crago, the party’s legislative director, and Darrin Smith, the city’s director of community development and public parking. The mayor gave the party his blessing.

You get the feeling from reading this first part that the Mayor has pull in the SD Democratic party, and my suspicions of a governor run are in his future. As for Darrin Smith, I wouldn’t take much political advice from a guy who couldn’t even finish his council term.

“I just don’t like to get involved in elections like that when they’re nonpartisan,” said Munson, a Republican. “And that’s the way it should be. In the position, you have to work with Republicans and Democrats.”

Munson is right on one level, I don’t have a problem with the SD Democratic party supporting DEMOCRATS, but when they are throwing their weight behind someone who is a Republican, that’s a NO-NO, and I HOPE they learned a lesson, Knudson got her butt handed to her.

“One of the things he (McGovern) tried to do was to get Democrats to run for as many offices as possible — to not let Republicans run unopposed,” Schaff said.

I totally agree, but like I said above, support candidates with in your party, or at least indies that share some of your political values.

Smith said he attended the meeting to discuss the Democrats’ efforts to repeal Gov. Dennis Daugaard’s economic development program. Smith, a Democrat, supports the governor’s program and he wanted to explain why the Democratic efforts were wrong.

No, Darrin, you are wrong. The city’s economic development plans under your watch is to give as many handouts to private industry as possible. As a former ED office employee told me once, we have plenty to offer businesses that want to relocate here besides giving handouts; High productivity at lower wages, no state income tax, the best parks and schools of any city our size in the country, and top-notch public safety. It’s kinda like selling someone a $200 Weber grill for $100 then also giving them a $100 rebate.

“I remember going out of my way, telling them, look, city staff are available to educate and inform,

Yeah we had a city employee who was good at that job, and you fired her. As for getting an education on city politics from a councilor who quit, wouldn’t that be like an 8th grade dropout teaching calculus?

Kyle Vanderlinden was one of two candidates challenging incumbent Councilor Greg Jamison in the Southwest District. Crago emailed Vanderlinden, writing, “A few folks have asked us about your City Council race against Greg Jamison, and I’d love to be able to tell them a bit more about you, how they can help, and how we might be able to help you in a non-partisan fashion.”

Vanderlinden met with Crago. During the meeting Crago said Vanderlinden would need about $15,000 to beat Jamison. But Vanderlinden said he was uneasy when he was questioned about what he thought of Huether’s achievements. Vanderlinden said he had no problem with Democrats working with him, but he was uneasy that Huether might have been involved. He turned down the help.

This is where the waters get murky. While I do believe the meeting happened, I still question just what kind of involvement Huether had with the races, especially De Knudson’s campaign.

Jamison, a Republican who gets mentioned as a potential mayor candidate, said he appreciates that Vanderlinden declined the help and hopes his challenger runs again. “Kyle Vanderlinden has the exact character and integrity we need on the City Council,” Jamison said.

This is why I endorsed Kyle, I think he is bright with a ton of potential. I also think it takes a lot of integrity to turn down an offer like this. I truly commend Kyle for coming forth with this story and telling both Ellis and I about it, right after the election.

“The one person I probably would have enjoyed working with was De Knudson,” Huether said.

When she lost, however, Huether said he called her opponent, Kermit Staggers, to congratulate him.

This is true, I was standing right next to Kermit when he got the call.

Nesselhuf helped gather signatures to get Knudson, a Republican, on the ballot. Nesselhuf served in the state Senate with Knudson’s husband, former Majority Leader Dave Knudson, and is a family friend. There was no Democrat in the race, and Nesselhuf said, “I didn’t have any problem helping her out.”

Sorry, Ben, still doesn’t make it right, especially after Jesse Vavreck was asked to step out of the race (a Democrat) who I told Kermit had a better chance of beating him then Knudson.

The party didn’t hold a fundraiser and didn’t do anything inappropriate, she added. But individual Democrats cut her checks.

I don’t think they did anything inappropriate either, our 1st Amendment rights guarantee we can support any candidate we want to, whether they are in your party or not. That isn’t the point. I have a problem with the secrecy of the deal and the counter productivity of supporting candidates out of your party.

 

Not that it matters now, or maybe it does?

I received new information today that the SD Democratic Party, or at least one of their operatives, supposedly, was helping De Knudson to raise money for her campaign. I only have two sources, so I’m not going to say whether this is true or not, just speculation at this point, BUT;

1) It would explain why a young Democrat like Jesse Vavreck was asked to step out of the race.

2) It would also explain why Knudson was asked to speak at a Democratic forum and not Staggers.

3) I also found it a bit odd that so many loyal Dems I talked to supported De.

This should come as no surprise, Dave and De Knudson were Democrats for years, but like Bob Litz, they realized if you want to move up that political latter you have to register Republican, except it didn’t work for Dave or De. At least their son is smart enough to stick with the Democratic label running for the State Legislature, even though I think Manny Steele is going to cream him.

I find it a bit humorous, that even when the SD Dems put all of their resources behind a Republican they even lose, in fact I find it completely, side-splitting hilarious. It wasn’t like Kermit beat De by a couple of votes, he handily beat her and did it with a grassroots campaign that spent 20% of what she did.

For the record, I never thought I would support a conservative candidate like Staggers, but I like his record on fiscal responsibility and transparency in government, something the faux Republican Knudson never has had a record on.

I also find it a little disappointing that the Democrats wanted Kermit to lose so bad, they had to back a Republican. Who says the two parties can’t work together? Except this time the result was quite disastrous, and quite embarrassing.

If this all really went down, as I have heard it did, I hope the Dems learned a lesson from it. Support your own next time, you know, like Jesse Vavreck.

(PS – I also heard they tried to help other candidates that were running against Republicans in the council race.)