Downtown Sioux Falls

How is the Low Head Dam replacement coming along?

A few months back Cameraman Bruce (Danielson) and I were talking about all the missing information to the public about how the dam got approved and what process was happening to make this happen. In an ideal society that has a local government that is TRANSPARENT we would have had all that information, but not in Sioux Falls. So Bruce had the brilliant idea to do a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request from the Corp of Engineers for the project. While it took several months and 2.2 GB of information, the CORPS granted Mr. Danielson’s request. I have been sorting thru the materials for over a month and finally have them to where I can start posting about the process. There was many twists in turns in the process, including changing the direction of the design, water contamination, a refusal from the SD Historical Society (State Agency) and much more. While most of the materials are redacted of personal names, it is easy to determine who the contractors are, who the city employees are and who the CORPS are. The irony is any email or correspondence coming from the CORPS is extremely professional and detailed, city employees and especially the independent contractors NOT SO MUCH. It seemed they didn’t want to get the CORPS involved unless they ran into an issue. Which is odd since the CORPS won’t officially approve the project until it is finished, and that may not be until the end of next summer since after the dam construction is finished they have to create wetlands around the area to preserve the area AS IS.

What I have found fascinating is the city seems to be doing this by the seat of their pants and crossing their fingers it will work, which I believe has put the project over budget by at least $1 Million because of the poor planning and lack of concerted coordination with the CORPS. This city will never learn, when you do things in the OPEN you save the taxpayers money and it makes the process smoother. If they would have also made the process more open and brought the public along, there may have been members in our community who wanted to weigh in with ideas. I have often argued our city is full of smart folks who understand this stuff, if we would just ASK them. It reminds of the process when a group of citizens decided to tackle sustainability in Sux and all of the efforts and work turned into toilet paper Poops used to wipe his tight ass. We have experts in Sux, but instead we use leaders who are more concerned about selfies and jumping jacks then expert advice.

I hope to put up the materials by week’s end, it’s going to be a whopper of a post.

The Problem with Erik Muckey

Representative Muckey has been blabbing anywhere he can about how he voted against the property tax cut, then in the next breath complains about TANF cuts. There would be less people on TANF if their property taxes weren’t so high.

I don’t care if you are Indy, Repug or a Demorat, you NEVER vote against a tax cut. NEVER! Political suicide. Was this property tax perfect or even fair? No. But it was a starting point for more adjustments, like fixing our assessor system.

We know why he voted against a property tax cut; Teacher pay. The tired old argument Dems haul out when they are running for office. Do you know who cares about teacher pay? Teachers, and a couple of Dems in the legislature. That’s it.

I have made the same argument to legislators over and over again, which usually falls on deaf ears; Teacher pay in SD is reflective of other professional salaries in the private sector, for example, nursing. South Dakota is almost dead last for nursing pay. There are many other professional fields that are below the national average in South Dakota. I’ve said the best way to raise wages for teachers is to raise wages for professionals in the private sector. When they make more, they buy bigger houses, and pay more in property taxes which raises teacher pay. This isn’t rocket science folks. A good start would be presenting legislation that eliminates all of our right to work state laws.

I’m not sure who is Erik’s audience on this one? Kadyn? But you never vote against a tax cut. NEVER! And you especially don’t brag about it after the fact. Have you written your political obituary yet?

Hey, Jodi, let’s go for a bike ride

It seems our local media has been on a ‘look at how great the city is’ kick these days. Blaming bicyclists for poor planning of detours on the bike trail, and now patting themselves on the back over the transient issue, not so fast;

Because repeatedly, now, as I’ve walked throughout downtown Sioux Falls in essentially any direction, the difference is clear: The feeling on our streets has changed for the better.

While I would agree, the panhandling has been less in that 3 block strip on Phillips, the transient population HAS exploded this summer DTSF (in the fringes).

I ride almost every night DTSF after dark and I do a homeless count. The biggest night I had was 36. Most nights I count over 20. They hide at various parks and camp out on the fringes of DTSF. They absolutely love the Levitt space (because they have outlets to plug in their smart phones) Sure, they have been pushed out of the main drag, but they are seeping over into the neighborhoods around DTSF (some of the poorest in the city with very little police presence unless they are hiding on a break, that happens a lot). There is a picnic shelter close to my house on the bike trail that is literally a campground for around a dozen transients, and when the police chase them out, they are back the next night, same people, same spot.

I would encourage Jodi to take a ride with me at night, and SEE just where the police DTSF are pushing these folks. Because while the panhandling has been down, the population has exploded and the problem exists in the shadows. The SFPD, which I believe are responsible for eliminating the issue (they are called public safety officers, it is YOUR job to keep us safe, that means addressing the transient issue instead of playing whack-a-mole.)

I would give each transient approached by either a street team specialist, ambassador or an officer FIVE options;

• The LINK (ONLY option if they were extremely intoxicated). After DETOX, these four options will be available;

• A bus ticket back home.

• Stay with a friend or relative locally, and have them pick you up.

• Go to a shelter that would except them.

• Jail for trespassing, and after incarceration the three options above.

If we started being strict with these options, you would see the problem lessen, right now they are playing a game of whack-a-mole and just moving checkers around on a board. I think MOST of these options are compassionate and humane, and they actually work.

So Jodi, you can keep writing stories about how glorious DTSF is, or you can get on a bike with me and see the real issue.

So what candidates are ‘qualified’ to be mayor?

I was pondering this today, what if I didn’t know any of the candidates running for mayor? I didn’t know them personally or even knew what they looked like and I was asked to review their professional resume (non-government experience) who would I lean towards? Well, just based on resumes it would be Joe Batcheller.

I know this sounds odd, because Joe has NOT announced yet, but it sounds like he is running, and he checks most of the boxes;

• Non-partisan moderate (not even sure if he is a Dem, Repug or Indy)

• Lead a non-profit for several years

• Worked as an urban planner (his degree)

I think the last point sealed the deal for me, because we had no mayor since Hanson that had any government experience, especially planning.

This is NOT an endorsement of a fella who hasn’t announced yet. It’s just something I thought I would look at. Joe is going to have to show some enthusiasm and some pizzazz when he is out on the trail, and I’m not sure he can pull that off, BUT on paper, he’s a winner.

We know how it rolls in SF, it comes down to looks and personality, and if you ain’t got it, you are toast.

I am encouraging citizens to actually research the professional resumes of the candidates running instead of just looking at a wink and a nod from another salesperson.

The next mayor will be handed a giant stinking turd; half the directors will be gone, the operating expenses on all the new play palaces will drain tax dollars and we will likely be in a ‘light’ recession by the end of the year, and like the last one in 2008, it will take several more years for the middle class to get caught up in Sioux Falls. I still know people who are still behind the 8-Ball from that recession.

We are going to need a leader who knows city government and how to pull it’s levers.