The Pavilion to open an Ice Ribbon Bar?
l3wis I had heard rumors about this a few years back that since the City now can pull liquor licenses for their own facilities they would open a full liquor bar and restaurant at the new ice ribbon (Items #39-40). I don’t want to get into some moral argument about whether or not we should be selling alcohol at a city park facilities, we sell them at the golf courses and Great Bear, BUT, should the city be competing with other food and beverage providers in that downtown area? Or as one city official said to me ‘Why not contract with a PRIVATE restauranteur?’ The argument of drinking and skating aside being less then safe, I think it is bizarre we are building this facility but it seems the focus is on food and beverage? I also find it funny that a single beer will likely cost you DOUBLE of what a rental fee would be for the rink (ever bought a beer at the Pavilion for a show?)
I knew the Pavilion’s Darrin Smith had his claws in this contract for a couple of years now, so no surprise they are getting it, but like buying the Sanford Fitness Center, we are NOW competing with private business for absolutely NO reason. So is this an ice ribbon or a bar? Maybe right before they turn if off in the Spring they could fill it full of Jello Shots!?
OTHER CITY COUNCIL TIDBITS
Besides opening another bar downtown we don’t need the city is also having a Riverline District meeting, but it is entirely an Executive Session. So how is it that just regular folks that get appointed to a bogus committee get to see legal documents in an executive session? If they can be shared with them, normal members of the public, then those docs need to be shared in public with the public at the same time. This whole process is sooooo crooked it is not even funny.
Item #6, sub #3, is a funny one. $62K to tell the city the Canaries Stadium is a dump.
Item #42, Notice in this lease agreement where we are allowing Sanford to continue to use space we bought from them at the Wellness Center, it has NO dollar amount, just that it will be over $500 a year. Betcha they are leasing the space for $501 dollars a year. Wonder if any of the councilors will ask the actual lease amount.
Item #43, The mayor appoints a VP of banking to be on the Parks Board, and who says that board isn’t made up of regular folks!!! Because what we need is more rich people on that board! They just are not represented enough!
Items #44-45, the council moves to make Jim David boss of everyone, even the City Clerk. Weird. Has the city council lost confidence in their City Clerk?
Item #46, council makes a bunch of benign changes to policies. For instance, they are changing ‘public comment’ to ‘public input’. Doesn’t really matter, same thing, except that input is a broader definition of comment.
Item #47, Seems councilors want to ‘lock in’ a price on future rec bonds. Good Luck with that. They did that with Drake Springs then after they lost the election stole money from that pot for other park projects. A snot rag would have a greater legal standing then this resolution.
On a weird note, Harris may win the election by taking IOWA!!!!!!
