SF School Board Member

Instead of Op-outs maybe we need to make TIFS harder to get

Ever since the State Morons in Pierre changed the rules for TIFs (can be for economic development now) They have exploded. I suggest that we limit them to severely damaged lands and low-income housing. The school district just did ANOTHER opt-out, and lied to the public about our taxes increasing. A foot soldier left this comment about the opt-out on Turdbook;

As regular taxpayers are asked to fish into their pockets for $2.1 million of additional money, each year for the next 10 years, be reminded that just for the TIF package given to the developers of The Steel District, the Sioux Falls School District will forego (aka not collect) $1.05 million in real estate tax revenue from those parcels in 2026. For the TIF package given to the developer of Cherapa II, the Sioux Falls School District will forego nearly $1.2 million of real estate tax revenue from those parcels in 2026.

In other words if we started eliminating TIFs and close out the current ones our taxes would actually go down. Did you know that 80% of property taxes paid in the school district and city are from single-family owner occupied homes. So yes, we are paying for these TIFs. And for what? A parking ramp? Public art? Tequila Bar? Seriously! If we eliminated ALL the TIFs we have on the books now the school district would take in MILLIONS in revenue from the big commercial developments. Why are homeowners asked to pay the majority of taxes in Sioux Falls? It should be a 50/50 split between homeowners and commercial property. TIFs never have much of a ROI, studies for decades across the US have shown they don’t stimulate growth and produce very few jobs except when being built. TIFs are a boondoggle and the average Joe is taking it in the shorts. In memoriam of a certain developer who passed recently, the council should make steps to eliminate TIFs from our city, once and for all.

Sioux Falls School District Election

The Sioux Falls School District will hold their election next Tuesday, May 13. There are 4 candidates running for 2 seats, with 1 incumbent running.

While you can vote for 2 candidates, I am only endorsing ONE candidate; Patricia Ringold.

I was in a weird position this time around to NOT know any of the candidates personally so I was able to do my research like everyone else, reading bios, media questions and the candidate forum. I have kept an open mind, and she rises to the top every time. Besides being just an average Jane (not a ladder climber looking to add something to her resume) she has years of experience in youth education and when she talks about the school system and kids you can tell she truly cares and understands.

As for the other candidates, they are all OK, so that is up to you, but what steered me away from them were some of their long winded, meaningless, canned answers. Kelly is the incumbent, yet she hasn’t said a peep about what she has accomplished so far on the board and blabbed about training HS school students for the trades, which is great, but she kept talking about the students as if they were part of some kind of economic development big picture instead of encouraging them to pursue higher education. Werner is a Trumper, but he does have some great ideas, unfortunately he thinks it is OK to display the 10 Commandments in the school room even though it is a clear constitutional violation. Duffy is a canned candidate that the Dems pulled from their hat. An accomplished attorney who made sure she answered every question perfectly. She was handpicked by out going board member Reiter who now serves as her treasurer of her campaign. This kind of crap irritates the piss out of me. Carly, you are done, enjoy your school board retirement. Why do outgoing candidates in this town always have to recruit a replacement for them? It’s irritating and to be quite honest with you it is extremely UNETHICAL and lacks integrity. I think Carly accomplished a lot of great things on the school board, so BRAVO! But let the chips fall where they may. This is why I am telling people to NOT vote for Duffy. This setup disqualifies her and you would think an attorney would know better. Oh, and none of the candidates mentioned our exploding property taxes. You want to know why? Because they avoid controversial topics like a 10 foot pole. I like leaders with spines.

The Bizarre stuff folks do when running for local public office

You can always tell when someone local is running their own campaign(s) or getting extremely poor advice when they do silly things with their paperwork. So this Thomas Werner dude is running for school board, he has ran in the past for the legislature and failed. I can see why, he seems to be giving himself some very poor campaign advice. It’s too late to correct the F’up now, but it was a really stupid move. So the election for school board is May 13, which gives him just a few weeks to campaign. So what does he decide to do while running for school board? File his paperwork to run for city council. WTF? Do you want to be on the school board? Do you know how this looks? It’s like you already gave up on that seat. No wonder no one votes for you. There is NO voter confidence. So is this illegal to run for two different seats at the same time? In this case NO. But if the city council and school board were the same election and on the same ballot he could NOT run for a council seat and school board seat at the same time. I just shake my head sometimes when I see folks run their own campaigns. Maybe he will file paperwork to run for Central District city council, At-Large city council and Mayor. And if he wins all three seats he will save us a lot of money. No surprise his FB page is littered with Trump Junk.

School Board Candidate Forum on Wednesday

You can watch the event HERE! There are four candidates, but it is pretty obvious who will emerge on top. I am attending the Change Makers event on Saturday where 50 concerned citizens get to question the candidates in an open forum/round table. Can’t wait. I will focus on the 1st Amendment in my questioning. Be prepared candidates, I don’t accept BS answers, and I will call you out. I think anyone who runs for political office, especially locally, needs to study the constitution forward and backward. If you don’t understand the highest level of government law, you don’t understand governing.