October 2013

Extreme changes to DT parking?

After the gigantic announcement that DTSF parking was going to become ‘better’ with a New motto “Look for the Gold P” it looks as though the only ‘P’ we are getting will be running down our legs in the form of a ticket that has to be paid. (Proposed Changes to the Appeal process; Doc: parkingticketrepeal)

I’m no specialist on city ordinance law, but the proposed changes to appealing a ticket seem to have become harder (item #28) Not only now will they be charging you $25 to appeal (most likely a $5 ticket) if you fail in your appeal, tough cookie, no other options to the appeal exist. The city is literally trying to eliminate any recourse after the appeal hearing.

Of course, most people will just pay the $5 instead of fighting the ticket at a cost of $25, but let’s say you receive a $50 or $75 ticket, and you lose your appeal? According to the changes, and I may be wrong, you cannot take it to court.

Now, I am no constitutional scholar, but I think they are opening a pretty big can of worms on this one, and I hope the City Council asks some serious questions about these proposed changes. But if you want an explanation or preview of the changes, good luck there to, because during the Informational meeting today, where there will be a presentation on the changes, the DOCs don’t exist in SIRE yet.

So was this new ‘PALs’ concept just window dressing making it look like things will get better? My suggestion to anyone receiving a ticket that they think was underserving is just to tear it up and throw it away. Why? Well since the city is proposing a change that says you cannot take your appeal to court, that means they can’t take you to court either. So how do they propose collecting the fine from you if you refuse to pay the ticket? Good question.

Is it time the TIF program be expanded (changed) to where it is really needed?

As many know, Detroit Lewis isn’t a fan of TIF’s, but I am not exactly opposed to ALL TIF’s. A TIF to build a luxury hotel or condos just doesn’t make sense to me, but to clean up neighborhoods and offer affordable housing, now that makes sense. It seems the SPECIALS in town have got a corner on city hall and totally backwards when it comes to TIFs. My new favorite reporter Atyeo at the AL did a fine story of how the city is helping out the ‘little guy’ for cleaning up affordable housing;

He learned about the city’s rehab program through a mailer. Property owners can loan up to $25,000 over five years with 3 percent interest. The first six months of the loan are interest-free, and no payments are required.

This is a wonderful program and similar to a program I took advantage of after purchasing my home, community development. I believe my interest rate was either 2 or 3% to fix my windows and rain gutters. While the program has it’s merits I have often wondered if TIF’s would be a better way to clean up neighborhoods and affordable housing. NOW don’t quote me on this, but I kind of remember Darrin Smith mentioning there would have to be a change in State Law to make TIF’s available to private property owners. But what makes an individual who owns several rental properties different then a large scale developer? If this person is willing to take a risk to fix up existing properties to make them better why not offer them a property tax break (TIF) and pass that savings on to the renter?

TIF’s are good, if used properly, and I believe this would be a great way of using them, but hey we don’t need any more affordable housing, just more condos and luxury hotels 🙁

Has Sioux Falls looked into Omaha’s taxi procedures?

I don’t all the details of how Omaha runs their cab service, but I do know that you can call a ‘central’ dispatch, and they will send an available cab from registered companies to you. And from my experience, it is fast and safe. You also have the option of calling individual companies dispatch.

The city is considering changes to the cab rules in SF. Some are silly, like telling a single car owner and driver he or she has to run 24/7, basically eliminating single owner companies. This is wrong for several reasons, most importantly it goes against free enterprise, if someone wants to run their cab service 2 hours a day or 12 hours a day, that is their business, as long as they are following other city ordinances pertaining to cabs.

I have argued that the city needs a ‘central’ dispatch like Omaha. Any cab company can register with the dispatch (for a fee) and when they are available be put on the rotation docket. Now some people are afraid of ‘safety’, well mostly Councilor Erpenbach, who apparently only rides in cabs if she knows the driver, nice small town mentality. Drivers have to be licensed and certified, secondly, if you really need to know the cab company that is going to pick you up, you can call them directly. Central dispatch would be for peak hours when most people don’t care who picks them up. It would also be fair (because the companies would be in rotation and take turns), and from my experience fast.

This isn’t rocket science, but like most things the city tries to ‘fix’ you will see a mountain of new rules without a lot of sense behind them, and hardly any enforcement (think texting and driving).

Whatever happened to spending healthcare revenue on patient care?

As the independent candidate for governor, Mike Myers said during his speech at Democratic Forum (in between yoga and pushups) “Hospitals should be spending their revenue on patient care, not on basketball stadiums.”(sic) to which he received an applause.

Tell that to this guy;

As Kelby Krabbenhoft drove toward the outskirts of Sioux Falls in his pickup Thursday evening, he had plenty on his mind.

The Sanford Health chief executive officer was headed for the Pentagon, a five-sided, $19 million basketball wonderland featuring an old-fashioned Heritage Court that seats 3,250 and harkens back to “Hoosiers” with its throwback décor.

Long before the facility became reality and drew national attention by hosting an NBA preseason game — as it did Thursday night — it was a vision that struck Krabbenhoft while he watched his son, Joe, play summer basketball.

“It was a ‘Field of Dreams’ kind of thing,” said the 55-year-old health care CEO, sitting in his luxury suite above the court as the Minnesota Timberwolves went through warmups.

“When Joe was playing AAU ball, you’d go into these stale gymnasiums and get the feeling that if you ever had a chance to do something special, you would do it right. How great would it be to go back in time and try to capture the history of the game?”

Something special? Participating in wrestling tournaments throughout ‘stale gyms’ in this state, I never once thought it hampered the experience. In fact, there was a bit of charm to many of the school gyms across the state, I still laugh about the time we hit the showers in Lake Andes after a bout and the water shot from the wall instead of the shower head. But this should come as no surprise from a man who just went bear hunting (a trip paid for by sick people). And watches a game from a ‘luxury suite’.

Of course Kelby justifies it all;

“When we recruit high-end physicians, they always ask if they can see the children’s hospital and the sports complex,” he said. “It benefits us and everybody when we can boost the community like that.

So this is what we are building this town for? High end physicians? What about the nurses and techs that work at your facility? What about the working poor and middle class of this town? We now can justify using money from sick people who can barely afford medical care and use it for basketball stadiums so your physicians can be entertained? Forget calling this place Sanford Falls, I liken it to Rome.

“At Sanford, it’s the law of big numbers, and it’s hard for people to wrap their minds around that. But we spend one-third of 1 percent of our budget on community dividends, which means that 99.7 percent is spent on health care.”

What he doesn’t tell you is that .03% is millions of dollars that could be spent on patient care. Which brings me to the government shutdown. Whether you are for or against Obamacare, doesn’t really matter. The whole purpose of the ACA was to address the healthcare industry and the way they treat patients (like dirt). Isn’t it the epitome of Sanford to be building a basketball stadium while the Feds are screaming THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY IS SCREWING US OVER!

Oh the hypocrisy and irony of it all. And the crying babies in both parties whose only solution to reforming ACA (and it needs some reform) is to shut down the entire government instead actually just debating and reforming the actual law.

And while we have thousands of dead cattle and sheep in the West, we play basketball in the East and you can hear a faint murmur from Kristi Noem in some Mitchell, SD hair salon.