What is the City of Sioux Falls doing with our Data?

I’ve asked this question many times from city officials, never get an answer. You would think the city would share with the citizens what they are doing with the data? Because as you can see, it can be VERY useful for city government;

It can be very helpful to the public collecting and analyzing that data. In fact the city thinks it is so helpful the salary budget for the department is around $1 Million a year;
First off, the obvious. If the city is collecting data on citizens, that needs to be shared quarterly on the city website. Secondly, we need to be told what the data was used for and how it has improved our lives or made the city more efficient. I don’t think the city is using it for that. When you have corporate executive raises and over $100 million in no bid contracts, it seems to me the city isn’t depending on the data to much, because if they were, things would be a lot more efficient and fiscally responsible.

So why the secrecy and what do I speculate the data is being used for? I think ‘certain’ folks in the city are siphoning the data in some kind of quasi legal way. What could you use that data for? Well, any business owner that provides a service in town would eat that stuff up, so it could be sold, but not sure how they could get away with that. I do know the data is shared with other communities, which is good, and it could be siphoned off that way also. But my bigger concern is that a political campaign consultant got their hands on the data, it could be VERY beneficial when cross-referencing voter lists. I am NOT making any accusations, but it sure seems curious to me that the city spends a million a year to collect data on us and never shares it (accept on this terrible search engine that reminds me of Yahoo, 2003). Somebody is using it, while we are paying to collect it.

It pays to work in the Sioux Falls City Attorney’s office

As I was perusing the salary data, I was alarmed at the massive wage increases over the past 4 years in the city attorney’s office.

DATA: 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026

First off, this is an 8-5 job unlike private practice and I can guarantee if you are a private attorney in Sioux Falls you ain’t pulling this much and you are likely working 60+ hours a week. But what else is astonishing is our city attorneys are rarely litigators. The city pays out MILLIONS each year in outside legal counsel and is constantly defending suits due to their lack of transparency, maybe this is why they pay them so well? Not sure, but when I was talking to some minion city employees about this recently their heads were about to explode. Some if not most of these attorneys were getting almost a 40% raise in 4 years! That is 10% a year! No for profit corporation gives out those kind of raises. I also find it ironic that all the assistant attorneys make the exact same amount instead of based on case load or experience. Very odd. We also have to look at sales tax collection over the past 4 years, not even close to the 40%! All salaries come from 1st Penny sales tax revenue. This is just blatant fiscal corruption on the mayor’s part (he can give any amount of raise he wants to). I hope the next mayor goes on a termination spree and gets the city’s management salaries in context with economic realities. And the ones that have a problem with it and go get a job in the private sector, preferably in a different town. There is also the irony the mayor cutting library hours and MCC while handing our ridiculous raises NOT based on performance.

Allenstein, Keith E Senior Assistant City Attorney $123,572.80-(23) $145,433.60-(24) $150,529.60-(25) $162,032.00-(26) 4 YEAR RAISE: $38,459

Bengford, Paul M Senior Assistant City Attorney $123,572.80-(23) $145,433.60-(24) $150,529.60-(25) $162,032.00-(26) 4 YEAR RAISE: $38,459

Engel, Amanda W Senior Assistant City Attorney NOT EMPLOYED-(23) $145,433.60-(24) $150,529.60-(25) $162,032.00-(26) 4 YEAR RAISE: $38,459

Golden, William H Senior Assistant City Attorney  NOT EMPLOYED-(23) $145,433.60-(24) $150,529.60-(25) $162,032.00-(26) 4 YEAR RAISE: $38,459

Pfeifle, David A City Attorney NOT EMPLOYED (Outgoing salary of former city attorney was $180,000-(23) $217,360.00-(24) $227,219.20-(25) $236,371.20 4 YEAR RAISE: $56,370

Attorney Laurenz, Cheryl F Senior Assistant City Attorney $123,572.80-(23) $145,433.60-(24) $150,529.60-(25) $162,032.00-(26) 4 YEAR RAISE: $38,459

Attorney Leonard, Karen A Deputy City Attorney $147,971.20-(23) $180,481.60-(24) $186,804.80-(25) $192,400.00-(26) 4 YEAR RAISE: $44,429

Attorney Sage, Ryan J Senior Deputy City Attorney $123,572.80-(23) $154,752.00-(24) $160,160.00-(25) $173,700.80-(26) 4 YEAR RAISE: $50,128

Attorney Schlimgen, Catherine A Senior Assistant City Attorney $101,025.60-(23) $125,840.00-(24) $137,051.20-(25) $148,137.60-(26) 4 YEAR RAISE: $47,000

Mulder, Amber L Senior Assistant City Attorney NOT EMPLOYED-(23) $145,433.60-(24) $150,529.60-(25) $162,032.00-(26) 4 YEAR RAISE: $38,459

Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth

During the city council meeting tonight there was a debate about how much money will be spent on the new Frank Olson Industrial Complex. The bond approved was for $47 million, but some kind folks wanted to give $1 million for the place, which was accepted. It is also a one time gift. The Parks department employees really want to spend the money on ‘extras’ because every time they walk to the podium they are salivating over all the extra crap they get to buy. Where the Kirby’s messed up was giving the entire amount all at once, this of course was a tax write-off and the reason the Kirby’s created the PRIVATE parks foundation was to funnel tax write-offs into our parks system. Not a bad idea, the problem is the money needs to be more focused and beneficial to the citizens. This EXTRA money is unusual because usually a major sponsorship like this would be over a decade and the money dispersed evenly over the 10 years and used mostly for operating. The sponsors should have handed the money to the Development Foundation and let them disperse the money over a decade to the city for operating expenses and signage (which should not cost more then $30K). I don’t have a problem with the gift, but it seems like the city is just going to piss it down their legs, BUT as long as the IRS is happy, who cares?!

THE ROAD(s) TO NOWHERE

The council also debated the new Minnesota Avenue expansion between 2nd and 7th for $12 Million, $7 million below expected bid. The design alone cost us $1 Million. I guess our city engineers do NO engineering, I heard they mostly run errands during the work day.

Curtist the Blurtist bitched about the medians and wondered about changing design, Cotter said, ‘too late’ design is all done and you would have to go out for new bids with changes. I don’t think this city council has a clue what our city departments are up to, and that is on purpose. They love to plead ignorance and they did it a lot tonight. So get ready for Minnesota Avenue to look like a scene from the Brutalist as Vernon Brown referenced tonight.

HEY TRE! DO YOU STILL EXIST?

Or did you take my advice and change the name to Lyre Ministries? Also, what is Ryan Spellerberg’s association with the org? He didn’t LEGALLY provide his conflict to the citizens during the meeting while participating in ALL of the other meetings leading up to the 2nd reading including voting. Dude really doesn’t understand muni government, which is astonishing being in the real estate business, or maybe not 🙂

Either way, a friend who lives in the neighborhood called me bitching,

“What the F— are they doing with this property? F’ing street been closed for months and no work. What the F—?!”

I of course laughed and said that the place will probably never get built and sold to some developer who wants to build a big apartment building or an oil change place casino, I also told him that the city closes streets all the time and nothing happens. There is a closed street on my block and they use it as storage. I have lived in my home for 24 years and the same two semi-trailers have sat on the land the entire time. No plates, no registration, no nothing. I have reported it to the county for licensing and they told me to go to Hell and said it was a city issue. The city did nothing when I told them, except that it was ‘private property’. NO IT IS NOT! IT IS AN EASEMENT!

My point? Don’t close streets in residential neighborhoods, it just attracts cockroaches and grifters.

If I was a betting man, my guess is there will NEVER be an indentured X-tian servant apartment complex built there. But, man, can’t we dream of a world where the White Christian Nationalist Housing and Coffee House becomes reality?

God, please save us from these folks. Please. As Jimmy Stewart would say, “God… I’m not a praying man, but if you’re up there and you can hear me, show me the way”.  Or better yet, show the council. They sure could use a Clarence or a Kermit these days 🙂

What was the count?

So they do a long story about the homeless count and provide some stats, but NOT the actual count. If I had to guess it is around 650 a number the mayor threw out there recently. So was the number provided to the media and they decided to not include it? Or did the city not give the number? You can probably get it from the Feds so I am guessing the news org decided to self-censor that number, but why?

I think telling folks what the actual number is helps with awareness. If the public doesn’t know how many, are they aware we have a problem? Not sure, because the media has decided to sugar coat the problem. I live DTSF and ride my bike all over downtown, the entire DTSF area has become a gigantic campground, and it is dangerous because when you tell them ‘NO’ they come after you.

There has been a rumor floating around that the SFPD has said fixing the transient problem is NOT their job. Not sure if this is true, but your literal job description is ‘Public Safety’. That means making sure the transients have a safe place to stay, but it also means protecting the public from those who threaten our safety which I see DAILY!!!! The SFPD have one job, keeping it’s housed and UN housed residents safe. Not sure they get it, the local media certainly does not.