Entries Tagged 'Public Works' ↓
November 24th, 2015 — Developers, Development, Public Utilities, Public Works, Sioux Falls
Curious if the Sioux Falls City Council is authorizing these home purchases or if once again, the city planning and public works office is ‘going rogue’. Heck, I even wonder if the city council knows about it at all?
After heavy rains in August flooded a central Sioux Falls neighborhood, city officials are looking for a permanent way to stem flooding.
Homes along the west side of South Covell Avenue between 28th and 33rd Streets could be torn down to create a green space.
Several homeowners in the neighborhood near Augustana University have been contacted by the City of Sioux Falls with possible offers to purchase their homes.
The city is talking with neighbors first, before releasing a finalized plan. Environmental and Storm Water Manager Andrew Berg said it is a voluntary buyout, and no one will be forced to sell to the city.
And that’s the Huether way, instead of fixing the infrastructure in the modest neighborhoods in Sioux Falls, we prefer to just bulldoze them. Now that’s progress and getting things done! I wonder if this will make MMM’s list of ‘Top 10 Wins of 2015’?
October 30th, 2015 — 1st Amendment, Public Works, Sioux Falls
After hearing a rumor that the Jesus plows were back, I made a trip out to Public Works. They are not, they have been replaced by two other themes this year. The Lutheran school did an American flag with the word ‘God’ on it, and another school did an American flag with ‘In God we Trust’ on it. These are well within constitutional rights since the word ‘God’ doesn’t promote a certain religion (the point we were trying to make last year). In one sense I should probably commend the schools for actually grasping their constitutional rights, but on the other hand you get the sense they are still poking the bear to see if there would be any controversy. Besides the fact that painting an American flag isn’t really creative, the whole thing that is ludicrous about this is that the stupid disclaimer signs remain, this time they have them mounted to the actual blade.
October 13th, 2015 — Public Works, Sioux Falls
Remember this fiasco from last year, where our mayor didn’t understand constitutional rights? I wonder if the Christian schools will get it this year and not yank that chain again?
While the city maintained they didn’t supply the paint, they do admit they prime the canvas for the students;
The Street Division primes the plows, and the schools and organizations supply the paint.
And of course they had to include this stupid disclaimer;
The City of Sioux Falls does not censor the content or any viewpoints on the artwork. All of the plows will include a decal stating: “The City of Sioux Falls encourages creativity. This ‘Paint the Plows’ work is created by students. Any messages or views expressed are not those of the City or endorsed by the City.”
I’m encouraging the administrators and teachers of ALL of the schools involved to encourage creativity and discourage challenging the US constitution this year. Maybe paint some snow angels this year instead of stealing a copyrighted logo.
July 29th, 2015 — Public Utilities, Public Works, Sioux Falls
Let’s just say after reading this in a city press release I decided to do a little research;
The City will be using the product Permanone for spray treatments. Products used by the City of Sioux Falls are designed to break down in the environment quickly and are used at very low concentrations. Permanone is a product approved for use by the EPA in residential areas for adult mosquito control.
Sounds harmless, right? Unless you are a small animal, get it on your skin, fish or bees or a vegetable garden or have chickens. Here’s some fun facts about this poison they are spreading throughout the city;
This pesticide is extremely toxic to fish and aquatic invertebrates. Runoff from treated areas or deposition of spray droplets into a body of water may be hazardous to fish and aquatic invertebrates. Do not apply over bodies of water (lakes, rivers, permanent streams, natural ponds, commercial fish ponds, swamps, marshes or estuaries), except when necessary to target areas where adult mosquitoes are present, and weather conditions will facilitate movement of applied material away from the water in order to minimize incidental deposition into the water body. Do not contaminate water when disposing of equipment wash waters.
This pesticide is highly toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment on blooming crops or weeds. Do not apply this product or allow drift when bees are actively visiting the treatment area, except when applications are made to prevent or control a threat to public and/or animal health determined by a state, tribal or local health or vector control agency on the basis of documented evidence of disease causing agents in vector mosquitoes, or the occurrence of mosquito-borne disease in animal or human populations, or if specifically approved by the state or tribe during a natural disaster recovery effort. Applications should be timed to provide the maximum possible interval between treatment and the next period of bee activity.
Do not use, pour, spill or store near heat or open flame.
Do not allow spray treatment to drift onto pastureland, cropland, poultry ranges or potable water supplies. Do not use on crops for food forage or pasture. In treatment of corrals, feed lots, swine lots, and zoos, cover any exposed drinking water, drinking water fountains and animal feed before application.
I guess we got our answer to what the city is using to kill skeeters, but what other harm is it causing?
July 17th, 2015 — Public Works, Sioux Falls, Sioux Falls Parks and Rec
I guess I haven’t really thought about it much until the past couple of days as people have pointed out to me that they haven’t seen many honey bees or beneficial bugs. I have several wild flower pots in my backyard, and I have only noticed one bumble bee so far this summer, and no honey bees. There are products that can be used that don’t affect the honey bees and beneficial bugs, and different application practices (avoid aerial and spraying during the day) this product uses a bacteria that kills mosquitos;
“Bti”, Bacillus thuringienis ssp. israelensis, are bacteria which infect and kill mosquito larvae. These bacteria are highly selective, killing only mosquitoes and their close relatives like gnats and black flies. Formulations of Bti will only kill these types of insects and do not harm other kinds of insects, fish, birds, worms or mammals.
– Bti is harmless to other wildlife
– Easy to apply!
– Effective within 24 hours.
– May be applied pre-flood.
When Bti are eaten by the mosquito larvae, they damage the gut cells and quickly paralyze them, then kill the larvae quickly and efficiently. A moderate to heavy dose has been shown to reduce the mosquito population by one half in 15 minutes and the rest within one hour.
Using non-biological insecticides have proven to kill honey bees;
Problems may arise if these insecticides come into contact with honey bees. Honey bees are susceptible to many insecticides, and in fact pesticides are a major cause of honey bee deaths.
Public awareness of the importance of honey bees is growing. Besides providing the beeswax, honey, propolis, bee pollen and royal jelly that are the basis for countless businesses, honey bees are essential for producing a substantial portion of our agricultural crops. As pollinators, honey bees are unsurpassed in their service to farmers producing fruits and vegetables such as apples, cucumbers, squash, melons, blueberries, pears, etc. Without a large and steady supply of bee colonies, commercial growers would not be able to produce these crops, and their businesses would fail.
As for the beneficial insects, it may be affecting them also;
With the threat of new emerging infectious diseases in the United States (West Nile virus, Malaria, Dengue), the clamor for novel personal protection/vector control devices has increased significantly over recent years. The two new tactics that have been introduced for controlling disease-carrying insects in a residential setting consist of fogging the vegetation surrounding the home withlong-lasting insecticides and the installation of residential misting systems that spray the desired area with aninsecticide on a daily basis. There have been some preliminary studies conducted that show that these tactics can have some effect on the mosquito populations in the backyard setting. However, these new control tactics and devices may have an adverse effect on the beneficial insects providing natural biological control of pest species in the areas subjected to the chemical treatments.
Beneficial insects include all the organisms that occur in the environment (may be augmented by the homeowner) that help to keep pest arthropod populations low, pollinate various plant species, and prevent major damage to backyard landscaping.
Some of those beneficial bugs are Lady Bugs, Spiders, Preying Mantids, Assassin Bugs, Ambush Bugs, Thread-Legged Bugs, and Ground Beetles.
As for songbirds disappearing, I am only speculating they are not around because their favorite food is mosquitos, flies and gnats.
Not sure what kind of product the city is currently using, but there are numerous other biologically safe ways to kill the mosquitos and save the bees and beneficial bugs.
July 13th, 2015 — Public Works, Sioux Falls
They will make them in the meeting tomorrow.
I have heard that the final recommendations DO NOT include any residential concerns for distances, even though there was tons of public input about keeping a good distance from residences. Can’t wait to hear the debate that occurs at the meeting tomorrow.
July 5th, 2015 — Public Works, Sioux Falls
Expectation of community rights by residents, is it a right?
When this group of concerned citizens are gaveled together by Councilman Rick Kiley on July 2m 2015 we find them having to ask hard questions and hear real concerns.
You know who we don’t get real answers from? Shawna and Jeff are evasive as ever.
We have billboard company reps here with real concerns for their future and citizens who are worried about their ability to sleep in their own homes due to all night every night lightening type storms. How would you like to have your home of twenty years all of a sudden bombarded with crazy light shows at 2am?
We have an expectation of safety in our homes. We have an expectation of peace when we sleep. Just because a non-caring city official changes the color of a dot on a map without properly letting us know, we can no longer have peace or safety?
What do you think?
June 28th, 2015 — Mayor Hubris, Mayor Subprime Mike Huether, Mike Huether, Public Utilities, Public Works, SF City Council, Sioux Falls
More street improvements in Hizzoner’s hood.
There’s been rumors that the street he lives on has been worked on several times since he has been mayor.
It’s good to be King.
June 23rd, 2015 — Public Works, Sioux Falls
The Billboard Committee met again today at City Hall in the old commission chambers, THIS time they decided to have open discussion BEFORE adjournment. After Steve Young with the Argus does a story about last meetings’ open discussion being video taped after adjournment and the possible violation of open meetings laws (which city officials denied), they decide this time around discussion will occur during the official meeting (but hey, they didn’t do anything wrong last time) just correcting something that wasn’t broken.
May 12th, 2015 — Mayor Hubris, Mayor Subprime Mike Huether, Mike Huether, Public Works, Sioux Falls
During ‘Ask the Dictator . . . uh, I mean Mayor’ (FF:19:32). He says;
“You know Sioux Falls, we don’t have to wait for the street sweepers to come by and sweep our streets, we don’t have to, ah, if you got leaves or junk in your curb or gutter, hey, go out there and sweep it up . . .
I think sometimes we rely on government so much to do the work for us, when we are so capable to do the work ourselves . . .”
He also went on to claim that they are sweeping the streets three times a year. I don’t think so.
I will have the mayor know, that I do go sweep my own curb, several times a year, but I usually have to use a scoop shovel, because there is so much crap, and while I don’t take issue with that, I take issue with your statement about ‘depending on government’ to do our work for us.
1) The streets are owned by the city and we pay taxes to have them maintained. This includes repair, resurfacing, snowplowing and YES sweeping.
2) The city maintains a public works department responsible for street maintenance, our taxes buy the street sweeping equipment and YES, pay the operators to run the machines.
Do I expect government to do everything for me? Not at all, but when I am paying into government to perform a service, I expect it to be done.
Locally I figured I spent about $2,800 in taxes (sales/property) last year. If I sweep my own street (which I do quite often) do I get a discount?
As for government ‘expecting’ to do things for us, you are right. I don’t expect things like;
– $500,000 to an indoor tennis center so 102 members have a place like that.
– $24 Million to an indoor pool
– $115 Million for an entertainment facility
Government’s first expectation is to provide services for the taxes we pay (like sweeping the streets) Not to entertain us.
Once again, the mayor demonstrates his skewed priorities.