March 2011

Where is the Pav’s Arts Night image website?

The Pavilion has always had a website up showcasing the Arts Night work. Though the exhibit has been up for almost a month, I still can’t find an image website, or even an artist list.

Of course after their spies read this post, they will have a website up in 24-48 hours.

I see that the Argue Endorser gave them a glowing review because of a few sold-out shows. Kinds looks like they are polishing the turd before the 2010 numbers come out.

So, a tip of the hat goes to the Pavilion’s team and other entertainment leaders. Together, they’ve helped ensure that a vital component of the region’s quality of living has remained economically steady even during tough times.

So they ended the year in the black? We’ll see.

I wonder if ‘1984’ is required reading for SF school district students?

It seems administrators have read the classic many times, and are using it for a policy handbook;

The local teachers union opposes a proposed policy that would allow Sioux Falls School District administrators to search employees’ private cell phones, purses and vehicles for suspected violations of district policy.

A school law expert from Ohio said the policy “certainly breaks new ground” and could open the district up to a lawsuit.

COULD?! This is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

But if challenged in court, a judge considering whether the search was appropriate would balance the employee’s Fourth Amendment rights against those of the district.

And don’t forget about the 1st and 5th amendments. I can’t believe the district is even considering this policy, oh, that’s right, administrators and board members allow lawyers to make all their decisions for them, very ignorant lawyers.

Huether’s Mexican Hat Dance

There were two separate articles today in the Argue Endorser with quotes from the mayor. He should turn the Listening and Learning sessions into a comedy routine.

Let’s first start with his response to blogs on the inter-web-nets, specifically, Holsen’s blog, who supported him, then didn’t support him, and now has an axe to grind, all the while feeding from the same trough as Huether;

Her thoughts on Huether have soured quickly: During the runoff election she supported him and even donated to his campaign.

Holsen said she’s always had strong opinions about issues. But in government, her job was to serve the mayor she worked for, and she kept her opinions to herself. Retirement and the glories of the Internet have set her free.

Huh? You worked for the taxpayers of this city, not a mayor. If a mayor was abusing the system, you had an obligation to tell the public. Who knows how many secrets Holsen flushed down the toilet about Munson? As for supporting Huether, no surprise there. Kermit called your ass out so many times I’m sure it started to get sore anytime you saw him in the same room. So, I’m sure it is pretty easy to complain about a guy you supported, simply because you didn’t like Kermit.

But let’s focus on Mike’s silly-talk;

“Occasionally,” he said, “I’ll get a Google alert. And when I read her stuff, half of it is kind of on base. And the other half of it is pure, made-up junk. So I don’t know who’s feeding her. I don’t know where she’s getting her information, and I don’t know why she’s doing this.”

OMG! LMFAO! I hope you get a Google alert about this statement, “You are the corniest politician I have ever heard speak!”

JUNK?

Holsen’s response would match mine if he were talking about me (in which he is, a little);

Anyhow, nobody is feeding her information, she insists. City employees do not provide her with material for her blog. She gets her information by reading the newspaper, watching City Council meetings and other city productions. She formulates opinions based on what she sees in public and based on her experience in government.

Do I get tips from city representatives? Yup. But trust me, I am not a junk peddler unless it has to do with my art 🙂

I formed an opinion about Mike early on, and I was spot on. Way before Staggers had him pegged. Kermit even said to me, “How did you know he was going to be in the runoff with me?”

Because people are naive, and believe what a well dressed, well groomed man tells them.

PART II

A better exchange of quotes happens between Huether and councilor Jamison;

Huether said the saved money is burning a hole in some City Council members’ pockets. “Some elected officials, their first reaction is, ‘OK, let’s spend it.’ I don’t get that. You worked hard to save it. Your first reaction shouldn’t be, ‘Let’s go spend it,’ ” Huether said.

Jamison responds;

“If we don’t have any priorities that need to be addressed, if our roads are smooth and wide enough and traffic is moving like it should, yeah, do something else with the $3.8 million. Save it,” Jamison said.

Until then, the money should be used for necessary projects, especially roads, Jamison said, something for which he found support when polling other council members.

I have never understood this whole ‘savings account’ attitude with taxpayer money. If you have enough leftover for a savings account, you are either over-taxing us or under serving us (both could be said to be true.)

But Jamison added that in a meeting last week among himself, Huether, and council members Sue Aguilar and Michelle Erpenbach, Huether “threatened me that if I did bring that up Monday, he would make sure the people of Sioux Falls knew that spending that $3.8 million right now would have a negative impact to the city,” Jamison said. “So, I guess, here we go.”

Spending money on streets and infrastructure is Negative? Is this the Day of Dead? Am I missing some party?

Huether later downplayed Jamison’s use of “threatened.”

“If that’s the way he wants to characterize it, so be it, I guess,” the mayor said.

Mike. Kinda sounds like a threat to me. And since you have most of the media sources in town by the balls, you could probably make good on that promise.

While I could care less about the pissing matches between Huether, Holsen and the council, I just find his lying appalling.

Strike up the Mariachi band!

The Ugly Table #35

‘Goat steak, well done!’

PASSING THE BUCK

When I used to work at a downtown European restaurant, great doom and gloom would come over servers when they had to take immigrants of a lesser eastern european country (which will remain nameless).

They THOUGHT they were Czech, Ukranian or Hungarian, but not a chance (I’m not even talking Romanian or Transylvanian).

In fact it got so bad, the owner would pay us to wait on them.

“Just do it, give them whatever, then send them away.”

Then the ultimate happened. They sat in my section at my latest franchise employer.

The same disposition; picky, bitchy, idiotic, and ordering food prepared like a caveman would, and pissed off because it tastes like shit.

They stiffed me. Just like they did sooooooo many fucking times at my other establishment.

But I GAVE THEM a second chance – sorta.

They came back, so I convinced another server to take them, but I schooled him on them and what to do. He charmed their asses off, he got all of their food right (without even hinting to them I was coaching him all along the way).

They were so impressed they got out their goat ass smelling phones and called their parents and told them to request him.

Of course, at the end of the day, as a server we care about two things, happy patrons and getting paid.

They tipped him 5%. As I expected from the goat farmers.

So I asked him, “Do you hate me?”

“No.” He said, “Your stories make it worth it.”

S. L. Ehrisman (c) 3/19/11

Saw this coming . . .

. . . concerning the racial discrimination accusations towards the ’18th Amendment’ bar. I received this comment on January 30 about the establishment, but didn’t really think much of it, until reading the Argue Endorser‘s story today;

2011/01/30 at 9:11 am

so it turns out that the 18th amendment is turning away black people at the door by handing them a card and telling them they have to call to find out why they are not allowed in the bar…sounds like a lawsuit to me!

I really don’t understand handing out the card? If you are so concerned about these ‘people’ being a threat to society I would hand them a condom instead.

As a result, management had instructed security workers to hand a piece of paper to people who they deemed might cause problems because of gang-related or “thug” dress, or because of perceived aggressive demeanor.

The paper invites the person to call the bar’s manager the next day to discuss why he was turned away and what the expectations are that would allow him in next time.

I’m on the fence about this issue. Racial discrimination is intolerable, and if they have people working for them that are racist towards blacks, they should be fired, I just find it odd that the same establishments employee black people. I have even heard councilor Anderson Jr. bar tends part time at one of the said bars.

Bar and restaurant owners can refuse service to anyone. I worked at a restaurant downtown that had a strict policy about teenagers and loitering. If they did not buy anything, I told them to leave. Were they pissed? Sure. But I will defend a business owner’s right to make money, and if a certain kind of patron is preventing that, throw their asses out.

I can hear it already. How is this any different then the smoking ban? It is very different. The smoking ban was about having a safe work environment for EMPLOYEES. It had nothing to do with patrons.

Who knows how this will play out.

My advice to the patrons that were turned away, stop crying and change your clothing. My advice to the bar owner, fire racists.