March 2016

SF Largest Developer, A house divided in the At-Large Council seat

Not sure if they are hedging bets in the executive offices of SF largest commercial developer on what candidate will come out on top, but the donations are interesting.

First the donation to John Paulson’s campaign (From the Chairman);

paulson-don

Now look at the donation’s to Ritch Noble’s campaign (From the President/CEO and VP of Commercial Real Estate);

ritchdon

Not sure if this was an attempt to butter both sides of the bread or not, but us government nerds who watch this stuff, found it interesting.

First Sioux Falls City Council Candidate Forum this Friday

DemForum20160311

Candidates from the NW district;

Jacob Johnson, Briggs Warren, Erin Srstka, Greg Neitzert

Candidates from the SW district;

Manny Steele and Marshall Selberg

The fun begins at NOON on Friday, March 11.

The Chamber is also planning a couple of events;

YPN hosts ‘Meet the Candidates’ on Tuesday, March 29

Networking will take place from 5:30-6 p.m. At 6 p.m., each CIty Council candidate will have five minutes to introduce themselves and explain how their candidacy will affect young professionals. There will be no formal question and answer sessions and attendees will be encouraged to approach candidates and ask questions one-on-one.

Municipal Candidate Forum at Carnegie on Thursday, April 7

The municipal forum schedule is as follows:
At-Large Council and Northeast District Council candidates: 5:30-6:30 p.m.
15 minute break
Northwest District and Southwest District Council candidates: 6:45-7:45 p.m.

The Argus Leader is also planning special episodes of ‘100’ Eyes with the candidates in their respective districts.

Tune in to all of them and absorb the differences.

Councilor Rolfing has the longest brain fart in the history of the Sioux Falls City Council

tex-golfing-papa-john

This cake tastes kind of oily

Just when you think the Sioux Falls city council is going to do the right thing (they needed 5 votes to pass the Dakota Access Pipeline at the council meeting tonight) Rex Rolfing gets confused and the City Attorney allows him to revote (with his FIRST vote they denied the pipeline, then he switches it.) Item #8

Not sure what he was thinking, but with an important vote like this, not sure how you can just flip on a dime? We will get to his ‘reasoning’ in a moment.

It wasn’t like he was asked if he wanted vanilla or chocolate ice cream, he was voting on a dangerous pipeline (that we don’t benefit from as tax payers) running under our property, I could care less if it is 700 feet 700,000 feet. Leaks and breaks can occur at any point in the line.

Either you are for or against, for whatever your reasons or justifications. There really isn’t a grey area.

After Mayor Huether chastised the Dakota Access representative for talking about something more then the 700 feet of easement (even though he needed to talk about the entire area and Huether was being a jerk about the discussion).

They vote 4-3 and go into the next item. But wait, somebody wasn’t thinking (mainly Rolfing) and towards the end of the meeting they bring it to a re-vote.

Wait a minute, already failed. If Rolfing felt he mis-voted at the time, he could have said that right away AFTER the vote, not 15 minutes later. Probably the longest recorded brain fart in the history of the council.

Then Rolfing says he didn’t understand it needed 5 votes to pass, so he meant to vote yes but was voting NO to prove a point about supporting neighbors.

What?!

Voting on dangerous oil pipeline easements is NOT a f’ing game, you can’t have your cake and eat it to. Buck up, think about what you are doing and make a decision, otherwise, resign and let some responsible legislators lead our city.