Under his proposal, Johnson said projects should move forward only if they demonstrate no adverse impact on water quality or price, no adverse impact on electric rates, create good jobs, and deliver long-term tax revenue.
They do the EXACT opposite, so I am guessing Dusty is opposed?
————–
You can go here to see all the signing events, there are several this week starting tomorrow. I also encourage folks to pick up a couple of petition sheets and collect sigs to. While there are thousands of legitimate reasons to not build this Data Center, I am opposed to my electrical rates going up. Full stop. This decision by the council is one of the worst since it hurts individual’s personal finances.
Our elected leaders are telling us these days what they really think of the public;
Sally flipping off an auto worker and telling him ‘F You’ after he questioned Trump about protecting Epstein.
I guess we will have to wait and see the evidence before making any conclusions on this, BUT, as I understand it the reason ARS had to make additional repairs was because they damaged it while making the initial repairs, not sure if that is true, but I would assume this is why McGill didn’t pay them to make the repairs, because ARS was responsible. Like I said, I haven’t seen the evidence yet, but I also find it peculiar that the city is suing on behalf of a contractor? In my opinion the city (taxpayers) should get our money back from McGill for the repairs, but that should NOT go to ARS since they are partially responsible. I guess I am not buying the ‘on for seen damage’ claims for additional costs. Why? Because this roof has been a repair issue since 2015, and before that, the first year it opened people noticed water damage on the fourth floor, I saw it myself. We all knew the amount of damage, that’s why the price tag was so high.
It will be interesting what the courts decide, but we will never hear about it in the local news.
So this bank president wrote an editorial, that I won’t even link, because it read like an internal memo to the Chamber of Commerce, but he had to tell us how great it is for the state to be dumpling millions in taxdollars and rebates to the new dumpling factory being built in Sioux Falls. He also downplayed the conflicts of interest and scandals around the place because we are going to get 650 JOBS!
And that is the real reason we got this dumpling of a deal. Low wages, no corporate income taxes, TIFs, tax rebates, state backed low interest loans, direct handouts. Things couldn’t look better for the Koreans that will be making BANK from our cheap labor. There is even rumors they are going to build apartment complexes around the facility so the workers won’t have transportation costs. Kinda tells you what kind of labor demographic they are looking at (I bet they will build them a big community garden right next to the Data Center);
Ironically, looks like a line worker makes more then a teller at the bank the writer of the editorial runs;
I love it when these corporate rats climb out of their luxury suites at the Denty and decide to address the minions to tell us how good we have it.
Recently they have said that if the Federal Minimum Wage kept up with inflation, it would be at about $23 per hour in 2026. It is Not, it is about a third that.
I still think a living wage in Sioux Falls is $20 an hour if it comes with benefits and investment opportunities.
I guess low wage companies are going to come to our state whether we like it or not, but please, stop using my tax dollars to incentivize foreign investors. You clearly did NO research on Korean work ethic, but I have a feeling they will try to instill it here. Can’t wait to read those horror stories.
When fat ass bank presidents try to tell me about all the golden opportunities for the community because he gave away MY tax dollars to his rich buddies, it reminds of this story about a guy who wants an island, and he wants me to pay for it. I know. CRAZY! Besides, there is only one dumpling in this world worthy, the softball sized flour dumplings at Bohemian Cafe in Omaha (RIP). You put in a factory like that, and I will open a Kolache and Kuchen bakery next door.
I am still astounded that not at least ONE journalist or news organization in Sioux Falls hasn’t done a deep dive on Data Centers. It is obvious to me, the cons outweigh the pros. Don’t believe me? Try to find a positive story about Data Centers from a legitimate news source. You can’t find them. Sure there is propaganda put out by the Data Center lobby using social media, but those are paid for stories.
It appears the city council is hiring the same company (Polco) who did the National Community Survey to do a survey about government engagement. Council was already told what they need to work on;
For the record, this may be just a back payment for the survey and other consulting work, but that is usually paid in advance, so it appears they are doing another survey to figure out why the first survey turned out so bad. This is insanity. You need to have a public forum at the convention center and have constituents present their open government ideas to your FACE! You are so scared of the general public you have to blow $30K on another survey so you don’t have to interact with the public. Do you even have an inkling on how open government works? Apparently not.
I wonder if the comments will be deleted from this survey also?
You also ONLY have a month to put OPEN GOVERNMENT transparency on the June ballot. That would be my suggestion, let the voters decide how transparent their government needs to be by putting a package of open government ordinances on the general ballot. But that would have taken planning and having public forums on it starting this past summer. They were to busy trying to build a fence around Dudley.
Oh, and I find it funny the city is spending $500K on the Pavilion’s garage, and subsidizes the Lodge restaurant at the ice ribbon to the tune of $300K a year (also ran by the Pavilion). Did you also know the Pavilion offers NO free programming. Zilch! The art museum WAS free, but Mr. Greedy who runs the Pavilion broke that promise and started charging us. IMO, the subsidies to the Pavilion need to end since there is ZERO public benefit without purchasing a ticket. And even though it is a city owned building, upgrades and maintenance should be paid for by the Pavilion, and there should be a lease agreement.
But we need to cut other subsidies;
I would agree with the city that a review of services needed to be conducted with NGO’s receiving city funds, but why weren’t we doing this all along? Oh that’s right, because our elected leaders and city management are incompetent. I also think the city should do zero based budgeting. In other words, the city should start each department with $0 at the beginning of the budgeting process and justify their budget and expenditures. Right now, they just tack a percentage onto last year’s budget and march forward. It is lazy and it costs taxpayers probably over $100 million a year+ in unneeded expenditures and budgeting. We have a full-time finance department, they should be working on this all year long and getting rid of waste!
I agree with Mike Z, that the city council needs to do a full investigation and forensic audit of every single city department if they really want to get unnecessary spending under control.
I’m sure they’ll take another survey before making that decision though.
l3wis 
