Democrats

SDDP Rebuild, Vermillion meeting, Dec 14, 2016

Oh look, let’s see what’s behind the curtain, nothing but excuses, promises and bluster in Vermillion, SD. Try they might, the “established” SD Democratic Party continues to hold listening sessions. These sessions are comprised of mostly listening the same crap from the same people. It’s as if the Listening Tour of the party brass is being done to convince those in attendance to give them one more chance. Why?

Notice how Cameraman Bruce captured the party chairwoman blathering on about how great the leadership did. What? Where? The people who won and the winning ballot issues happened in spite of the things they did. The audience did not show up to hear central office excuses or rationalizations for continuing the crappy job being done.

Several candidates stood and talked but it appears they got little or no help in coordinating anything. Local efforts received no storefronts, no legwork, no leaving Sioux Falls office and no use of offered services they could not control. The only thing they were able to do is lose seats in the legislature in and election and cause the loss of the Democratic stronghold District 15 senate seat. Nice work and they all got raises.

The party could not even get together to build a bowel movement much less flush any corruption down a toilet. There are words for the show they are putting on and we don’t think this is the place for them.

Playing Facebook games and ignoring sage advice from people who have actually won elections is not going to bring the SD Democratic Party back to life. The only consolation to this dog and pony show is knowing the SD Republican Party is heading down the same path and they do not seem to recognize it.

Short Summary: The forecast is bleak with no change foreseen for the SDDP

This was sent to me by a reader;

Full Report: I attended the SDDP’s E-Board and Central Committee meeting in Mitchell on Saturday (12/10/2016). I was not in the room for any Quorum count but I am sure they had a Quorum for both meetings. I counted 13 counties toward the Quorum for the Central Committee plus a number of people I didn’t recognize. Electronic attendance was allowed too, though no notice was given.

Ann Tornberg acknowledged things went badly in November but she has no intention of stepping down. She never misses an opportunity to remind listeners that she was elected to a four-year term two years ago.

The Budget was presented to the E-Board without much discussion. Niblink  congratulated the Party for having a $100,000.00 cash surplus at year-end without any material liabilities against it. The meeting then adjourned to executive session to discuss salaries. This lasted at least an hour. ( Not being an E-Board member, I toured the Discovery Museum. (Interesting Museum. I recommend it.)

Meeting reconvened. The Budget was approved without much discussion. (I learned two days later that they approved $10,000.00 in staff salary increases in executive session). (I guess this was a reward for the poor results in November Ann alluded to.)  (The SDDP has 4 staff people, three subsidized by DNC at $2500.00 per month.)

The Black Hills area was promised their own office by Ann when she was elected Chair in December 2014. A motion was made to honor this commitment but it was tabled for further study. Ann reported on the listening sessions the Party has held. She said the take away was that we need a coherent message. She plans to hold more. She also announced she would not be working for the Democratic Caucus this session but instead planned to attend County Party meetings wherever they are.

Lunch Break

Central Committee Meeting:

Was carbon copy of E-board meeting except that 1) no mention during Budget approval of staff salary increases.. 2) I pointed out that it shouldn’t be considered an accomplishment to have a $100,000.00 cash surplus at the end of an election cycle; that the SDDP was not a profit making operation but was supposed to elect Democrats to office and I suggested that such a balance is evidence of poor planning. Staff responded that Republicans have a $300,000.00 surplus and that the SDDP didn’t spend the money because it wasn’t budgeted for. Someone then suggested perhaps they should have a process to approve spending when the SDDP has more cash than they budgeted for.

3) New Budget has projected a surplus of $56,000.00. So I asked if I was correct in understanding that the $100,000.00 surplus and the $56,000.00 surplus projected for 2017 meant the SDDP would end up with a $156,000.00 surplus at the end of next year. I was told this was correct. A discussion then followed about setting aside money for Statewide Candidates.  It was discouraged by Ann and nothing happened. 4) Then followed a discussion of the Black Hills office again with Leonard, Pennington County chair on the phone obviously pushing hard for a commitment. Tom Katus had a written proposal from Joe Lowe which was handed out. Finally, a motion was adopted  “To commit to a study of the proposal and report back at the next meeting” (probably in February).

Adjournment

Oh! And Tom Cool never missed an opportunity to remind the group that the squares on the Party’s organizational chart have been assigned responsibilities which they need to perform. Or else.

South Dakota Democratic Party Rebuild, part 1

The South Dakota Democratic Party got together at the Sioux Falls Public Library for one of their largest crowds yet on November 27, 2016. If they would have had more citizen turnouts there could have been more election victories.

Good grief Charlie Brown, Lucy tries to control everything and not listen was the message the party should have heard but did they? We’ll see, there must be big changes because what we are seeing so far is completely wrong. The results shown in November prove it.

Quit making excuses and get to work was the message given by these messengers.

What’s that saying about hitting rock bottom?

Maybe that is what the Democratic party in South Dakota needs, to hit almost rock bottom before coming alive again. They lost 4 legislative seats this year and are now down to 16 (which could easily turn into 15 depending on the outcome of Nesiba’s case).

This afternoon the local Democrats had a public meeting at the downtown Sioux Falls library (we hope to have video in a couple of days). Many great ideas were thrown around, and a lot of finger pointing was also done.

Here’s some things that the Dems realized they may have lost on;

• While supporting education funding is good, it was probably a major mistake to vote for a Republican governor’s plan (that will probably be repealed or gutted this session). They should have voted it down and presented their own plan.

• While gay rights, abortion and teacher pay are important issues, they don’t resonate with a lot of South Dakotans, especially conservative voters. The message coming from Dems should not always be an ‘elitist’ or ‘special interest’ message, but one that resonates with all, like worker rights (all workers), wages and fair taxes.

• In light of Measure 22 passing, it is evident that Dems need to also focus more on ethics and corruption the one-party system has inflicted on us.

What is the solution to fixing the party’s brand in South Dakota?

• The resounding consensus at the meeting was having a unified message that resonates with ALL voters. And having actual solutions to those problems, like corruption and low wages and regressive taxes.

Not sure what that message will look like, but the message so far isn’t working for the party. Legislative candidate Michael Saba said it best, “We have to stop letting the Republican Party in this state brand us! We need to brand ourselves!”


Something that happened at the beginning of the meeting really had me thinking, and I even blurted out someones name. One major complaint is where are the past Democrats with high profiles these days? Only one was mentioned, Tim Johnson, who gave $20,000 towards 20 different candidates from his PAC. But the bigger question was where were Herseth, Johnson (both of them) Daschle and Hildebrand during the campaign? Why are they not assisting in rebuilding the party? I even blurted out Mayor Huether. That’s a good question no one had an answer to. It goes back to the elitism that exists in the party. I especially find it ironic that the Mayor leaned on the SDDP to get him elected, and organized labor, and now he is no where to be found. He even convinced the SDDP to help out the city council campaign of a Republican, De Knudson. On second thought, maybe we don’t want his help.

There also seemed to be this desire to control the message of the media. Folks, not going to happen. First off, that is not how the Fourth Estate is supposed to function, and secondly we don’t even have a very good functioning media in this town. Our TV stations are more concerned about sick kids at the Sanford Castle and the weekly work out routine then they are about real news. And our local newspaper has been flailing and flopping like a fish out of water for several years now.

As was determined in the meeting, come up with a solid message, solutions, and hammer it home, day after day, and the media will start to take notice. Trump won because he had a message, you may not agree with it, I certainly don’t, but he repeated it over and over.

The Dems can pull out of this, and they must do it now, especially with Trump haters who are very angry right now and want some relief. Start with them, and work your way out.