Downtown Sioux Falls

What is the difference between an Advisory Election and a Bond Election?

First the definitions;

An advisory question is a type of ballot measure that is non-binding, meaning the outcome of the ballot measure has no legal effect on a state’s laws. This type of ballot measure is also known as an advisory referendumadvisory vote, or non-binding ballot measure.

A Bond Election is a type of ballot measure in which voters decide whether to authorize a local government to issue bonds to pay for specific projects or services. It is typically used to fund public works projects such as roads, bridges, and other infrastructure. The money raised by the bond issue is usually repaid by raising taxes or other revenue sources. Bond elections are often held in conjunction with other elections, such as municipal or county elections.

We had an advisory election with the Events Center. After citizens voted 54% in favor of building the Denty the city council had to take LEGAL action to take out the bonds, in which they did.

If the election was an actual ‘bond election’ it would have taken a 60% passage to pull the bonds, and since this is a LEGAL election, there would be very little action from the city council to initiate those bonds because the citizens LEGALLY approved the bonds in a LEGAL election.

I am often saying that an advisory vote is actually ILLEGAL because NO LEGAL action is being taken by the public in an election. I have encouraged councilors to have a LEGAL bond election with the Rec bonds and CC bonds. First it makes their job that much easier and secondly you are giving citizens the ability to tax themselves if they choose to (we will need an extra penny sales tax in order for the bonds on the CC to work).

If the city pulls an advisory election on the CC, I encourage any local attorney to sue the city for their ILLEGAL election.

The Predictability of the Sioux Falls City Council is painful to watch

Former City Councilor Big T wrote an excellent letter to the editor about how the citizens need to vote on the new parks’ expenditures.

I would agree, $77 million dollars in expenses needs to be decided by the voters and I am surprised that most of the council wouldn’t be pushing for a special election to approve these bonds. They will sit and cry and wring their hands about making these gigantic decisions when they can just easily call for an election and wipe their hands of it.

But the pool debate and some of the other debates the new council has been having has been soooo predictable. They pretend they are ‘concerned’ about the expenditures then vote for them anyway. They are NOT concerned and all these media games they have been playing (because someone may be running for mayor) is just smoke and mirrors. They have done this for decades before they have to do a big project. They promise all kinds of cost cutting and savings then once the project gets approved there are massive cost overruns and add ons. EVERY SINGLE TIME! Just look at the Ice Bunker Ribbon; Supposed to be a $4 million dollar project that turned into a $16 million dollar project (the donor must have needed a bigger tax write-off).

The council is going to make it ‘LOOK’ like they are on our side when it comes to financial concerns, but if they were TRULY listening, they would call a special election, but just like the predictability of their policy decisions, I will predict they will forgo the special election, and likely do an ILLEGAL advisory election with the Convention Center tying the two projects together to better SELL it to the public. I guarantee this is what they are cooking up. They did it with the Pavilion and Convention Center, it’s an old playbook.

Not only do we need to demand a special election for both projects we need it to be a LEGAL bond election where it only passes with 60% of the vote.

I would love to blog more about city politics, but the predictability lately has been a gigantic yawn. Oh, but I guess the mayoral candidates are all jockeying for positions, but I think the Skabs and their less then flattering boozer texts may be instigating all of this.

‘This is a very walkable city’

Sure, downtown, but unless you have a death wish, avoid traffic in all other parts besides the donut hole*.

So after bilking millions from taxpayers to build a patio in front of privately owned restaurants and condos they are celebrating the bilking today;

“It is one more asset honestly to our community that we can sell to people from all over the world. This is a very walkable city, a very friendly city and this is just one more aspect of people being able to come here and just relax and enjoy their time here and don’t have to be busy all the time,” said Nichelle Lund, senior sales manager for Canopy by Hilton.

Let me guess, Nichelle doesn’t live here.

Over the past 4 years I have put myself thru the commute wringer, 90% of my commuting has been on a bike or walking. One of the reasons I bought an E-Bike is so I can ride it anywhere in the shortest distance possible. I have literally reduced my mileage by finding the shortest travel routes, but sometimes I must endure the southside travel bonanza. Roads built like speedways and peeps that don’t care. Commuting on foot or by bike in this town is risky business, and I am not even mentioning the f’ing morons that don’t leash their dogs who want to run and chase you while the owners are slobbering on their phones. Most sidewalks are dangerous. I would guess, just on my commuter routes that 50% of public sidewalks in this town are in disrepair and bike lanes are at a minimum.

Sure DTSF is very walkable, but it could be better by eliminating one ways and making spaces more pedestrian friendly and discouraging vehicle travel. But this won’t happen.

The thing that cracks me up the most is when you pull into the Steel District, it is NOT welcoming, and the parking is confusing, you have this feeling they want to keep it a secret. Maybe it is a marketing strategy, but if you are trying to bring in clientele with unlimited resources maybe your staff should have knowledge of your menu and what a hot shower is. I think an appropriate name of one of your restaurants should be ‘Good enough’.

I had the pleasure of meeting one of the investors in the Steel District last weekend. I listened, which is rare for me, and while this person was extremely intelligent, they seemed to be naive about how these things work in Sioux Falls. Let’s just say, they were suckered and it may take massive losses on their business adventures before they figure it out.

The tale of two cities is real.

We can make this city walkable, but it would take a massive public education reprogramming of our habits. That ain’t happening anytime soon. I told several of my out of state friends recently who used to live in Sux that unless you own a car here, you are a nobody. Which also makes me laugh. One of my favorite things to do at a stoplight is look at all the miserable human beings trapped in their cars, while I cross lawns and parking lots avoiding most traffic signals LEGALLY. I told someone recently the freedom you feel when you have complete control of your commute makes up for the comfort of your Chevy fart mobile. I never thot I would like this type of commuting, but once you experience the liberty and freedom you will only look at your car as something you need from time to time. I love the saying, ‘Cars are Coffins’. because it is true.

*I call downtown the donut hole, because outside of it is the donut; poor working class neighborhoods that surround the hole. The irony of the developer class DTSF who like to ignore these neighborhoods don’t see the obvious. In order to get to DTSF you must pass thru the poorest neighborhoods in the city. It reminds me of Belize.

Until this city’s GOVERNMENT recognizes the DONUT the DONUT hole will be just that, a HOLE. Mr. Potter was right (C. Lloyd) until you clean up the neighborhoods around the hole all development DTSF will halt, and I don’t need Mr. Potter or a weatherman telling me any different.

Who is running for Mayor of Sioux Falls?

The guy who runs Dakota Wuss College thinks he knows who is running for mayor. He basically lifted my predictions that I have had since this summer. You are welcome. But Pitty brings up 3 new names that made me laugh so hard I just about passed out. While we know Erickson, Beck, and Huether will probably run, Pitty says that Councilors Jensen, Merkouris and Selberg are also considering. Pitty says they will have trouble raising money, but it’s NOT money they need to worry about, it is their reputations;

• While Alex was city councilor he gutted the internal audit department to one auditor that basically sends emails to an outside firm. This all came about because he couldn’t properly discipline a city council employee for poor attendance and she ran off to the finance department escaping punishment and got a raise from the mayor to boot. If this guy can’t manage ONE employee, he certainly can’t manage a city. If he announces I will probably piss my pants laughing.

• Oh Marshall. This guy ILLEGALLY lived out of his district for a year (verified by one of his friends) and lied on campaign finance forms. He doesn’t belong in the Mayor’s office, he belongs in a jail cell.

• Rich Merkouris has a pretty clean record, but if you dig, just a little, into his past, you will see he isn’t really respected in the clergy community because of past grifting of a church. It’s a long complicated story that happened several years ago, but the wounds are still fresh, and if you ask the right people, you will get the story.

While I think none of these people are dumb enough to run for mayor, they might. And trust me, I have years and years of proof and data on ALL of the candidates and none of it is good. I think Erickson will rise to the top quickly and will be in the runoff, but who is the darkhorse? Huether may run on the great Trump comeback. Which I find funny, he got the same number of votes in 2020 and 2016.

Greg Jamison told me this summer he would likely not run, and it’s not for the reasons you may think. Greg told me he just wants to spend more time with his family and grandkids, and who can blame him?

I told someone recently that I hope a well intentioned rich person runs for mayor with a good record of community engagement and charity and they will run away with the mayorship. Populism is where it is at these days and no one is interested in electing old (corrupt) hats.

I have a feeling our next mayor will be someone no one has heard of.

Councilor Soehl the defender of parking!

Curtist the Blurtist is at it again, defending parking. Yesterday during the informational where the city turned a regular old ice rink into a $16 Million Dollar entertainment facility (for no reason and for something NO ONE in the community was asking for) Curt didn’t question the extravagant transformation and being $12 million over budget instead he cried about parking.

The rink can take up to 250 peeps at a time and the parking lot holds 45 cars. Now there is on-street parking, a parking ramp next door and plenty of parking at Falls Park. Here’s the other thing, you are going to go ice skate, that is physical activity similar to walking, so why not park a few blocks away and walk there?! There is plenty of parking. When the Levitt has over 5,000 people attend a concert, I never see issues with parking. Where do all those people park?! Also, let’s state the obvious, besides the grand opening, this place will be dead most of the time. The only time you will see people there is if it is decent temps on a Saturday. Great Bear has proven people are winter wimps in Sioux Falls. And if it is below 20 degrees, good luck getting people on the ice especially since we have plenty of options for indoor skating in Sioux Falls at private facilities. I know people who live in SF and work DT and had no clue the place was even being built. I think if the parking lot only had 5 stalls, it would be enough. This place will be bleeding taxpayers for decades! But at least we have another wedding barn in town!!! And that’s the other thing. What if you have 200 people attending a wedding on a Saturday Night during the open skating season? Then you will have a parking issue. I can’t understand why we just didn’t build a simple warming shed and leave it at that? The things we let rich donors cook up with our tax dollars in Sioux Falls is getting ridiculous.

The Romans referred to this as ‘Bread and Circuses’;

In a political context, the phrase means to generate public approval, not by excellence in public service or public policy, but by diversion, distraction, or by satisfying the most immediate or base requirements of a populace, by offering a palliative: for example food (bread) or entertainment (circuses). Juvenal originally used it to decry the “selfishness” of common people and their neglect of wider concerns. The phrase implies a population’s erosion or ignorance of civic duty as a priority.

Taxdollars should never be spent on entertainment. Once Poops bankrupts this city with his Convention Center proposal maybe people will finally come to terms with having all these play palaces while driving over 6 inches of packed ice and potholes like a pimples on a teenagers ass. And if you think the Feds will be kicking anything in over the next 4 years that ain’t happening.