Planning Commission

UPDATE: Is the Planning Commission Approving an AI Data Center?

UPDATE: If you watch the meeting from the other night you will see that a representative from the city of Brandon showed up in opposition of this item. Not sure what his role is, but I think he works in planning. He basically said the opposition comes from two directions, 1) They are not sure what kind of data center they plan to build and how large it will be, they said the company (foreign) has been very secretive about sharing any plans with the city of Brandon 2) Which was the most important part of the opposition, was that area is already zoned for FUTURE residential growth which is in Brandon’s long term growth plan and has been for years. Of course our boot licking planning commission approved the re-zone because they said this is just preliminary (they say this crap all the time) but it is NOT. It changes it now from a future growth of residential to industrial which means to change it back you would have to go thru the process all over again with a new land owner. Stupidity. Until this foreign company reveals EXACTLY what they plan to build, we should leave it AS is, Ag land with future use for residential. It was also revealed at the meeting that 300 people would be working at the site. Hogwash. These places pull this crap all the time. This is the amount of construction workers that would be on site while being built, that would most likely be shipped in from other parts of the country, but once finished it may have 20 full-time peeps who will work mostly in security and maintenance.

Unfortunately the way our planning approvals are setup, they must first ask for a re-zone of the property BEFORE they can announce what they plan to build there (Item #5A-Regular Agenda);

FLUA-021026-2025: Future Land Use Amendment to reclassify a Development Area identified in the Shape Sioux Falls 2040 Comprehensive Plan from Tier 3 to Tier 1 and amend the Future Land Use Map for the area from Residential to Future Light Industrial located east of Veterans Pkwy. and south of E. Rice St.

First off, I am NOT a fan of changing residential zoned property into light industrial especially with our housing needs in Sioux Falls. Secondly, it is pretty obvious they are changing the zoning to put in a data center but there is NO mention of a Data Center in the attached documentation on the agenda item. I wonder if the commission is smart enough to ask the question, and if the client have plans to power it? These data centers take massive amounts of electricity, how will this affect the grid in Sioux Falls? Also, the company I linked above is a registered FOREIGN LLC, and has only been registered for 6 months. I hope the commission sees thru this ruse, but if not, hopefully the city council will see this for what it is, an AI data center that will suck us dry on energy and probably drive up our energy costs. WE DO NOT WANT THIS IN SIOUX FALLS. Besides the property taxes, there is very little economic advantages of having a large data center like this in Sioux Falls. It won’t generate any sales tax revenue and it will mostly be full of servers and very few employees. We will see how this plays out, I see the planning department recommends approval (which is a way of making sure the commission rubber stamps this).

UPDATE: What’s going on with promised Apartment Complex behind 8th and Railroad?

Last Tuesday the City Council got a presentation on RFP’s vs. Negotiated Sale. The topic came up because a negotiated sale is what the city is apparently still in the process of negotiating with the developer, Christensen, for the proposed development behind 8th and Railroad. I find this a little alarming. Back in June of last year the council got a presentation on the development. The developer told the council then that they planned to break ground in the Fall of last year or Spring of this year, now the planning department says it is is still in the ‘negotiating stage’. How can you be in the negotiating stage when the Planning Commission approved the TIF last July? Now there was a statement made by the proposed developer in June when they made their initial presentation; they said they would coordinate their build out with how fast the properties at the Steel District and more specifically Cherapa II would lease out. One wonders if those properties are having trouble being leased, and coincidentally slowing investment in the Christensen development? But we know how these games are being played in town. Years ago a franchise motorcycle repair shop tried to come to town and a major competitor with their wrench in city government convinced banks and other investors to back away from this franchise essentially shutting them down before the doors even opened. Funny how a TIF gets approved before a land purchase is even signed. We got some real clowns running the city these days . . .

SPEAKING OF A CIRCUS

There has been a lot of talk lately between constituents about how light and meaningless the city council agenda has been lately. The story is the lame duck mayor is telling council no new policy initiatives will be allowed on the agenda. I told someone, “The only reason you would shut down the only function of your policy body is because you have someone bigger then you riding your ass.” More to come on this.

UPDATE: Mike Zitterich sent me this;

I wanted to see how many ordinances and resolutions that get posted to the City Council Agenda by the mayor or city councilors, and in 2024, here is what I came up with: 

Out of 354 Ordinances/Resolutions sponsored from January 1, 2024 to December 30, 2024 — 

Mayor………………………….183……52%……………………5.1 Per meeting

Private Applicants…………..97……27%……………………2.7 Per meeting

City Councilors………………74……21%……………………2.1 Per meeting

36 Meetings in 2024 

HIGH: 

Mayor sponsored 13 total on August 13, 2024 

City Council sponsored 9 twice on May 14th and May 7th of 2024 

Private Applicants sponsored 8 total 3 times during the 2024 season.

Is the Sioux Falls Planning Commission full of conflicting developers and unethical players? YES.

The most frustrating part is that I warned previous planning chair Janet Kittams that they need to say why they are recusing themselves, what item, who they work for, etc. She blew me off, but no surprise, they all eat from the same government trough. In fact, it is in city ordinance and state law that they MUST disclose why they are recusing themselves. I noticed a couple of years ago that the Planning (rubber stamp) Commission started pushing stuff in the consent agenda. And for good reason, the members have so many conflicts they started pushing those conflicts into a consent agenda so they would seem ethical. But when you recuse yourself you MUST tell us WHY and what ITEM. The new chair, Bradyn Neises, who works for Bender Realtors, has a clear conflict, but he can’t tell us what it is. Our city government is so corrupt it is almost laughable. The planning commission should consist of RETIRED developers who don’t have a skin in the game, or just regular folks who work in development or construction. The planning commission is made up of grifters. Every single one of them has grifted from the city, and they sit on this board to make sure the grifting continues. That’s it, there is NOT one single person on that board that is not benefitting from taxpayer revenue, and it is disgusting.

It also got better at the end of the meeting where the chair decided he had some muscle after eating cookies in the anti-room while they were approving his projects and he cut off a public comment inputer before they were adjourned. It was a serious DICK move, and totally militant anti-open government. Why do they even record these meetings? Why not just do it in an opium den in the basement of Carnegie? You obviously don’t want to be honest and forthright with the public, so why keep putting on the act? The Planning Commission is a ‘Basket of Grifters’ and little else. It’s time to ween these sucklings.

Why is the Helpline Center getting so many city contracts?

If you check the agenda for Tuesday’s meeting you will notice that the Helpline Center is getting ANOTHER contract with the city to handle phone traffic. They also have contracts for other phone services with the city.

I will admit the city DOES need to use private phone services sometimes but it seems they are sending a buttload of duties over to this private non-profit. Why not buy them and make them a city entity? Probably break even.

I find all these contracts interesting since the CEO of Helpline is Janet Kittams who was the previous chair of the planning commission and still has a seat until April of 2025. She also served as chair when attendance was less then ideal. This is a blatant conflict of interest. Heck, she even signed the contract herself!

While the Helpline Center has had city contracts for a long time, it seems lately they are getting quite a bit more.

Wonder if a city councilor can tell me how much TOTAL we spend on the Helpline Center each year and if these services can be spread out to other contractors or better yet, teach city employees how to answer a phone. Seems pretty simple to me.

Councilor ‘Lucy’ Bayse proposes ordinance change without consulting local fencing industry

A new councilor is at it again, making an ordinance change that 1) doesn’t benefit homeowners, only makes fencing more expensive and 2) doesn’t give homeowners any options. Councilor Bayse proposed the change at the Planning Commission Meeting last night, but didn’t even bother to show up as a Planning staffer presented the item (don’t blink you might miss the meeting);

§ 160.480 FENCES.
(l) A fence post must be secured below ground level in all residential zoning districts.

He said a ‘couple’ of people complained that their neighbors(?) put fence posts in 5 gallon pails of concrete and didn’t bury the pails just had them sitting on the ground. So why not write an ordinance that says;

‘No fence posts can be put above ground in pails of concrete or other substrates.’

There is also a million different ways you can secure a post. You can attach it to another out building or your house, you can use L brackets and bolt them to a concrete patio pad. Heck, there are probably so many different ways to fix this, it’s not even funny.

I spoke with a person who is in management for a large fencing company in Sioux Falls. He had no idea they were proposing this. Fortunately it hasn’t arrived to the council yet so he has a few weeks to shake them down, and he intends to.

Instead of making regs based on a couple of your friends bitching, why not actually research the topic, talk to professionals in the field, heck, have a public round table. But for god sakes stop passing ordinances to make it look like you are doing something. And don’t pull away the football at the last minute either!