Why I don’t attend Renaissance Festivals or 80’s Rocker Concerts

Just Like this story, the city of Sioux Falls finds revenue much more important than safety. It is DOCUMENTED that the city has LOWERED yellow times. The reason? Well. Take just one guess. The following from an AOL link I had a hard time linking to this forum so I just did a copy and paste of part of it.
Recent studies of the effects and usage of red light cameras at intersections in Texas brought the website The Newspaper to the same conclusion that many motorists have: it’s about revenue.
First let’s look at some numbers: according to the NHTSA there were 34,017 fatal crashes in 2008, with 11,179 of them – and more than 800,000 injuries – attributed to speeding. Most of those fatalities occurred somewhere other than the Interstate, where the speed limit was under 55 miles per hour. According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, there were 260,000 “vehicle incidents” from people running red lights, resulting in almost 900 deaths.
That’s 11,179 deaths vs. 900 deaths. In 2006, when traffic fatalities were higher, speeding was deemed the number one cause of death for people ages four to 34.
Yet the IIHS reports that as of December, 2009 only 52 communities use speed cameras. The number of communities that use red light cameras: 442. Almost nine times as many cities employ red light cameras for the stated goal of increasing safety even though speeding appears to be far more deadly.
The problematic issue with red light cameras brings up the same word that describes the problem with speed cameras: “trap.” In the case of Texas, short yellow light times have been found to make it more likely someone will enter the intersection after the red begins to glow – and therefore make it easier to issue ticket.
In one case the length of a yellow light in El Paso was shortened by just a four-tenths of a second and citations jumped by 132%. In another case, a yellow light at a 45-mph intersection in Houston that lasted 3.6 seconds rang up 341% more tickets than the yellow lights at other, similar 45-mph intersections.
Opponents of the red light cameras point to the fact that the duration of yellow lights in these scenarios is often less than the minimum durations proposed by national and state traffic engineering bodies. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has a formula for determining how long a yellow light should stay illuminated, but intersections boasting red light cameras rarely follow those informal guidelines.
In 2003, a study by two researchers at the Texas Transportation Institute published a study that resulted in these findings: “(1) an increase of 0.5 to 1.5 s in yellow duration (such that it does not exceed 5.5 s) will decrease the frequency of red-light-running by at least 50 percent; (2) drivers do adapt to the increase in yellow duration; however, this adaptation does not undo the benefit of an increase in yellow duration; and (3) increasing a yellow interval that is shorter than that obtained from a proposed recommended practice published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is likely to yield the greatest return (in terms of a reduced number of red-light violations) relative to the cost of retiming a yellow interval in the field.”
In plainer English: increase the time of a yellow light, reduce the number of accidents. A one-second increase in the yellow light time duration resulted in a 40-percent reduction in crashes and a 53% drop in violations.
Never mind the fact that many red light cameras are not installed at the intersections with the highest accident rates. And never mind the fact that while cameras are said to capture up to 90% of their violations in the first second of a light going red, the large majority of accidents due to people running red lights happens five seconds after a light has turned red.
What makes it easy for to ignore that facts is the huge amounts of money involved. In Coppell, one of those Texas towns studied, one red light camera issued $862,275 in tickets during a 1-year span. That’s a healthy addition to the coffers in a town of just 39,000 people. Other, larger cities are known to reap millions from red light camera revenue.
And when it comes to short yellows, statistics and studies will pale in the face of the most important number of all: millions. Given the chance to address a municipal budget – and safety – the length of yellow lights is almost the same as a game of limbo: how low can you go?

Sioux Falls is a great place to live and raise a family. Our current Councilman has done a great job representing the central district and I wish to continue his tradition of fighting to keep taxes down and representing you.
Keep taxes low
Penny increases in taxes seem like little things now, but when these little increases are added up it can be more than we bargained for. In our current economic times finances are tough for many people, and it would not serve their interests to unfairly burden them by asking for more money, no matter how small it may seem. Low taxes are what has helped Sioux Falls grow, so let’s keep them down where they belong.
• I will work to stop any tax increases. Higher taxes leads to larger government, which needs more taxes to support itself.
• Sioux Falls enjoys a low tax rate, let’s keep it that way.
Be fiscally responsible
The money the city has is not it’s own, it is from us the tax payers. As such it should be spent in the same manner we spend our own income, with thought and foresight. Taxes have been raised to pay for this or that and in the meantime the condition of our roads has deteriorated. Where will the money come from to pay for the repairs? Another increase in taxes is my bet, but I want to address the budget and make adjustments where we can so that taxes will not need to be raised.
• Before raising taxes we need to see where we can save money.
• It’s not the cities money, I will be as economical with taxpayer money as I can.
Events center
It would be a great addition to the city, but we simply cannot afford it. Sioux Falls has grown without a new event center and it will continue to do so because this is a great place to live and work.
Listening to you
Serving on the City Council is a privilege, and it would be my honor to serve. The City Council is there for you, and all the councilors should be available to meet with the public when needed or asked so we may better serve you.
• We need councilors that will not be doing things other than listening to the great people of Sioux Falls.
• Always available to listen to your concerns. I know how frustrating it is trying to communicate with an elected official, only to eventually get a form letter or simply be ignored. I guarantee that will not happen.
If you have any questions about a particular issue I would be very happy to talk with you about your it, so feel free to email me at James_Milne@live.com or call me at 605-553-7102. I promise to get back to you in a timely manner.

Theresa Stehly attended the City Council meeting last night to talk about snowgates. Obviously snowgates only are effective in 0-12″ of snow (which is most of our snowfalls) and would not have worked very well in the past storm ON ARTERIAL STREETS, but they would have been handy on the emergency snow routes. As you can see from the video, it doesn’t slow down plows either. Of course anti-snowgate Vernon Brown couldn’t resist to get in a game of he said she said with Stehly. Whether they work or not is not the argument here, what I can’t figure out is Brown’s resistance to experimenting with them, at least on emergency snow routes. He doesn’t have a problem with spending millions to build rhino barns at the zoo (something that has ZERO benefit to the public – ZERO!) but pisses and moans about spending a couple of grand on an experiment? This kind of prioritizing by Vernon tells you what kind of mayor he will make.

James Milne recently filed. There is also one more candidate to announce/file soon.