Code Enforcement

Is Code Enforcement harassing political supporters now? Seems so.

Yesterday I was made aware that the city code enforcement department was trying to squelch free speech. A Staggers and Stehly supporter purchased and has been displaying these signs in his yard. A couple of days ago, code enforcement took them down and said he was violating ordinance. Not true, so he put them back up. After a discussion with the enforcement office he explained to them that as long as his signs did not exeed 1,296 square inches (they are 1,230 square inches) they are legal to display, according to city ordinance. The real reason they were removed was because of ‘several complaints’ the code enforcement office finally admitted. Really, is that how we enforce code now in Sioux Falls, if someone complains loud enough, the code enforcement office just makes up something? The signs are staying up for now.

Code Enforcement in Sioux Falls fixed? BAHAHAHAHAHA!

broken sidewalk

Looks like another code enforcement violation, send in the clowns

I find it quite ironic that while Dan Daily is awaiting his verdict in his lawsuit against the city on code enforcement that Mike Cooper comes in front of the city council and says that code enforcement is improving. Give me a f’ing break;

Those unresolved citations then must go through the city attorney’s office, which files the claims in court. Last year, the office filed 41 cases involving 177 citations.

“We are making progress with this new process, but as you can see there are still cases that take time to go through the citation collection,” Cooper said.

Takes time? You ain’t a kidding. When you don’t have constitutional rights on your side, it probably takes a lot of time. It’s time for the city and the court system to stop horsing around and deliver a verdict in the Daily case and put this clusterf’ck code enforcement system to rest, once and for all. What are you waiting for Caldwell? The code enforcement fairy to deliver the verdict? It is pretty obvious who has won this case. What judge takes over 3 months to deliver a verdict in a clearly cut and dry case? Seriously?!

Justice. What is that?

It’s been over 75 days, where is the verdict in the Daily vs. City of SF case?

ist2_5922723-justice-scale

Testimony ended on September 4, 2009 in this case, so why is it taking so long for Judge Caldwell to give her opinion? Good question. It almost makes you wonder if she is dragging her feet to see if the city pulls a rabbit out of their hat. I don’t know, I am not a lawyer, but it sure seems suspicious to me. Any lawyers want to weigh in? Is this a long time to wait for a verdict?

BTW, if you are not familiar with the case, SF citizen Dan Daily is contesting unfair code enforcement, it took over 2 years just to get his case heard. The city has probably spent over $100,000 in legal fees fighting a $200 fine.

“Sioux Falls’ one liner city ordinances have turned the city into a Gestapo.”

hammerzeit

Thank Gawd I wasn’t drinking anything when I heard a gentleman say that at the planning commission meeting. I would have shot it through my nose. I’m also surprised he wasn’t gaveled after the comment.

I have been listening to the Planning Commission meetings lately, they are usually long and boring. But the public testimonies are usually pretty heated. People in Sioux Falls are pretty passionate about their property and property rights.

In last night’s meeting the commission was debating whether or not to recommend approval to the council of a 180 day stay ordinance involving campgrounds. No matter where you stand on the issue (not sure what side I would take) it is obvious from public testimony the way the ordinance is written it is extremely flawed on many fronts and one commission member even suggested that a task force looks at it before approval. The Commission approved it anyway (tie vote, chair broke tie) to move onto the council (which will have to debate it also and I think it takes a 2/3rds vote to pass).

What made this public testimony even better was when local businessman Duane Spader who owns a campground showed up to chew ass. He basically said (besides the city acting like the Gestapo and dictators) that the way the city’s ‘one-liner’ ordinances are written it gives them wiggle room to do whatever they want to, to a suspected code violator.

It was beautiful, he handed the city their bullcrap city ordinance mess to them on a platter and basically said the system is broken and needs to be fixed. For Christ’s sakes alive, how many lawsuits and business and property owners have to tell the city that Home Rule and the city ordinance charter is broken before they fix it?

The theatrics were pretty funny. Mr. Spader didn’t hold back, at one point even accusing the commission members of not understanding the repercussions of their decisions (sounds more like the City Council and Mayor to me). They tried to pull the 5 minute rule on him (like Northside Davey did with me) but Mr. Spader was having no part of it and said when he’s done, he’s done. They gave him a time extention.

If you have the free time, it is worth at least listening too. I can’t wait to see his performance before the council. He has already stated that Staggers is the only councilor that stands with him.

Click on the planning commission meeting dated 5/06/09 and Fast Forward to about 1:16 hour (That’s when Spader rocks out). You might want to start at about 1:00 to see the full testimony about the ordinance change .