I avoided posting about this for a few days because I have been having conversations with different foot soldiers about this press conference;
Years ago Paul told this story how he helped a homeless person and he got burned, and he has been bitter ever since;
Then Paul said this;
“We are losing the war on addiction with our Native American Community.”
Sure. But let’s put things in perspective.
70% of admissions to the Link are homeless individuals. Most homeless individuals (not staying at a shelter) are living on the street and suffer from some kind of addiction.
There were 17,000 admissions to the link with ONLY 4,700 individual visits.
It costs us $2.5 Million a year to run the ‘turn and burn’ facility. (they basically detox you and throw you back to the wolves).
It costs us millions in public safety and judicial costs to arrest these folks, over and over again, some individuals have been arrested 75 TIMES!!!!!
So why not spend the money on a municipal shelter that takes in addicts and doesn’t shove a bible up their asses when they walk thru the door?
While I agree with Paul that a majority of these individuals are Native, that is NOT the issue, it is living on the streets! If we combat homelessness on a larger scale (like getting them housing) most of these problems would go away. Saying addiction in this community is a problem of the tribes and natives is ridiculous, HOMELESSNESS is the problem, and if you get them off the streets you can get them help. They are also residents of this community even if they are living under a bridge, and it is OUR responsibility to take care of them. It would be like a couple moving here from California and their house burns down in the first week they live here and the SFFD refuses to put out the fire because they are from ‘California’.
The argument is that ridiculous.
Also Natives suffer from addiction at higher rates due to poverty and other societal factors.
Also Paul asserted that addiction can be cured.
There is NO cure for addiction, and most addicts wish there was. The only cure is management. You will ALWAYS be an addict. I have two close relatives who have been sober for 30 years and 20 years. It is constant struggle for both of them, they have to fight it every day. I compare addiction to Type One Diabetes; While there is NO cure, it can be treated and you can live a healthy life, but you have to be vigilant.
To blame our addiction and homeless problems on Native Americans based solely on the numbers is bigoted and misinformed.
With any problem you go to the root. Homelessness and addiction go hand in hand. Solve one of the problems and you treat the other.
Duh.
So what the F’ck have you done Paul besides bitch about a minority group and pretend a cure exists? Not only are you tone deaf and ignorant, you are a bigot and you OWE the Native Americans in this community an apology for your moronic statements.
“From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever,” -Chief Joseph
On a personal note, I had an artist mentor, he was Native American, an ex-con and a sober addict. This sh!t gets personal with me because I love my native brothers and sisters and my aunt belongs to several tribes so it is family to.Paul has always been insensitive to minority groups, but this was a new LOW and disgustingand very hurtful to me personally to say these things about my close friends and relatives.
Board Member Pickard asked if micromobility devices such as e-bikes and e-scooters can be added to the agenda for next month.
I was unable to attend the February meeting this week, I was going to go but knew that if I had to listen to this ignorant discussion another time I would probably say things at the meeting that I would regret, but according to the minutes this was the discussion;
Sydney DePrenger introduced the first item. She informed the board members that City staff from various divisions will be present at the next meeting to provide more insight into how e-scooters and bikes are regulated by the ordinances currently in place. The board discussed actionable items such as considerations of ordinance adjustments that would allow the city to regulate both future and existing bike share business models to help them blend more seamlessly into the community and help resolve existing concerns.
I find the discussion troubling for a couple of reasons.
There is an easy fix to the Jaunt rentals and the city council hasn’t reviewed the E-Bike ordinance change in almost 2 years!
On June 1, 2024 the new Class II ordinance went into effect, and I told the council when they passed this they needed to do a full review of the change in ONE year! That was almost 2 years ago! They have done nothing, and I haven’t seen a bike cop on the trail since! I told them that after passage they should look at stats and see how the ordinance is working. Are there more accidents? Can we allow other micro mobility devices like foot scooters, skate boards and one wheels? They passed the ordinance and looked the other way. I am assuming that is why the ATB is discussing this because NO studies have been done to determine if this is working or not and if we can expand the trail usage.
The ATB can not make ordinance change recommendations to the city council without a study and full review of how it has been working. That needs to be done by the SFPD and Parks Department and the study needs to be delivered to the city council BEFORE the ATB. The city council is the policy and legislative body, though over the past two years they are just a rubber stamp committee for the mayor’s moronic policies so NIMBY clowns on these boards have no authority and no data to back up their concerns.
As for the Jaunt E-Bike rentals I noticed that they were out most of the winter until a month ago they disappeared. I think it is because businesses complained (since most of them were laying on their sides in the winter wind, it is also hard on batteries to be out in extended cold and damages them). They are still in business and it seems they are trying to find a solution to the random nature of the bike’s placement, including in front of bike racks that are intended for OTHER bike riders who are not using Jaunt. The irony is these things DON’T need a bike rack, they run on GPS tracking and can be parked anywhere! My suggestion when the business started was to put up their own personalized racks, put a map on the app where ALL the racks are (so peeps can return them to them) and get a permit for the racks on public property with permission from the adjoining business. It would be similar to the permit bars and restaurants downtown use for patios at a minimal cost. (I think a sidewalk permit is around $35 a year). This could be accomplished with a simple ordinance change instead of a bunch of stupid discussions and whiny businesses (I wonder if they realize it helps their business to have these rentals in front of them?)
And where is DTSF on this discussion? Oh that’s right, the organization now if ran by a puppet.
I have also said that there needs to be E-bike safety courses. These courses should be put on for FREE in a park by the SFPD and the Parks Department with assistance from local bike clubs (city needs to pay them to put on the courses). I saw a lady riding a step thru Gramaton (That’s what I call Aventons because the only people who ride them are Grandmas) and it was fairly new and she was struggling. If she took a short course on how to ride these bikes she wouldn’t be struggling. My guess is after her initial ride the bike is probably sitting in the garage collecting dust. While the city spends millions on an ice rink NO ONE asked for they can’t fix equipment in existing parks (equipment in fitness park has been broken for 2 YEARS! The park is only 4 years old.) and doesn’t put safety courses on. So who does the Parks Department serve? Good question.
I have to tell you, I have been enjoying reading the different bios and am still pretty much undecided in ALL of the races, but these are the candidates I am leaning into, and doing more research, and why;
• Joe Batcheller is who I like for mayor. I have liked his resume up against the others since the beginning, I also like that Joe is a professional urban planner (in other words he has a degree) and he wants to focus on two things; TRANSPARENCY and HOUSING. Don’t get me wrong, love Greg, and think Jamie and Christine are both qualified. We really don’t have a bad choice in this race, except the guy living in Hartford who likes to perjure campaign finance forms. I wonder if he can even vote for himself 🙂
• Vince Danh is who I like for At-Large A. I don’t know him, or have ever met him, but been checking his resume and I like that he is a very outspoken small business owner of immigrant parents. I want to do more research on him (shoot me an email Vince, would love to have coffee) but I like his message so far.
• Samantha Scarlata for At-Large B. This one is easy for me. Rich needs to go, he has failed at all of his initiatives, been nothing but a rubber stamper and LIES to constituents about helping them. He is NO good for this city, and if a freaking grasshopper was running against him, I would support them first. Oh, and Sam is the salt of the earth.
• Bob Trzynka for Central. I keep going back and forth on this one, because there are several great candidates, but Bob rises to the top. A brilliant lawyer who helped to save Lincoln Park for his neighborhood. This is all things I have heard about Bob since I have only met him on a couple of occasions. Like I said, tons of great candidates in this race worth looking at.
• Brady Kerkman for SE District. I have been researching all three candidates and I keep coming back to Brady. Sara is a well meaning mother, which is great, and Mike is a retired developer, who is a good guy, but he still has the ‘D’ behind his name, and they belong no where on the Dais. This one will be fun to watch and see who rises to the top.
Like I said above, I’m still taste testing out the candidates and encourage you to also. Had lunch with a candidate on Monday and we had a great convo! I am serious, reach out and have a one on one with them!
UPDATE IV: I still find it a bit ironic that Denny is giving $50 million to communists while the company he founded pays communist level wages. I know, pretty funny. Oh, and the stories that have been swirling around the donation and how it came to be; Pretty juicy stuff, but just funny gossip at this point. While it didn’t involve a 5-Foot branch, it was still just as kooky.
The Sioux Falls Development Foundation will use $50 million from T. Denny Sanford to buy the existing site, clean it up and eventually, redevelop it.
$50 million won’t be enough to replant grass on the site. To clean up that site and prepare for development will be $200 Million+. Are you telling us that this will be paid for by private investment? Hardly. When Public Works director Cotter was asked about the cleanup he just mumbles something about multiple approaches. In other words, coming to taxpayers locally, statewide and nationally. Heck, they had to admit in the meeting the TIF was being paid for by sales taxes across the state.
DOUBLE DIPPING ON THE TIF
As I have pointed out recently they plan to ask for a different TIF on the languishing apartment development by 8th and RR in the next couple of months, so I was surprised by this large one. First off, the obvious. The Development Foundation which gets millions from taxpayers each year already received a $94 million dollar TIF for the park a couple of years ago. That TIF was supposed to trickle down to the businesses that build out there. So why isn’t Smithfield just using part of that TIF? Oh, that’s right, they want MORE to build their wastewater treatment plant. Smithfield’s company wide profits last year were $1.5 billion. They ain’t hurting and they can afford this. I also struggle with giving foreign communists tax breaks while we are propping up our schools with sales tax on food instead of property taxes from international communist companies that can afford to pay those taxes. The taxpayers will eventually get screwed on this. When I talked about a petition drive on a TIF, this would be an excellent one. But the city of course has their excuses;
“We’ve used TIFs to stimulate private investment in areas that would remain undeveloped or underdeveloped and which will have long-term impact on the community,” Power said.
Is a new packing plant underdeveloped? Hogwash. I bet if this went to a vote and failed they would still move ahead with the plant. Think about it, we are cleaning up their mess for FREE downtown, they are getting a TIF for the land already and all the commodities (hogs) they buy are in the region. They asked for the TIF, because they can. It wasn’t needed and they know it.
SPEAKING OF THE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
So over the past few weeks the city has been getting some favorable bids, which means the engineering consultant the city was using was over estimating;
• Minnesota Avenue was estimated for $19 million, bid came in at $12.24
• Marion Road/Foundation Park estimated for $26.5 million, bid came in at $17.2 million
While we should be happy bids came in under, this causes lots of issues because of budgeting. So why was the consultant so OFF in the estimates?
Because the consultant has an employee who sits on the Development Foundation’s Board. Funny how those things work.
UPDATE III: As one person texted me after the presser, ‘I have more questions then answers.’ Yah think?
We heard very little about cleanup and redevelopment, and here are lingering concerns;
• Why was Mark Cotter secretly meeting with Smithfields over wastewater for a year? And what was promised? And how much of this expansion has to do with Smithfields? And if it is, what are they paying for the expansion? Does the council even know? Secret deals are never good deals, heck, the last COS was involved (oh and Poops announced that Vanessa is his current COS. I don’t remember that going thru a review process.)
• They are already getting a TIF thru the Development Foundation for the new plant. What other tax rebates and incentives were included?
• This will be an automated plant as assumed, so how many jobs will be lost in transition? Maybe none since they plan to almost double capacity.
• Denny is paying $50 million for the property and gifting to The Development Foundation which will parcel it off and make lots of $$$ from it. Will these profits be offered to help clean up the property?
• Who is paying for the cleanup? Like I said, an estimate 10 years ago was $100 million to properly demolish and remediate waste from the site. So why would Denny pay $50 million for a property that will cost another $100 million to clean up? Because we will be paying for it and the Development Foundation and their cabal of grifters will cash in. Someone told me they will likely call it the ‘Sanford District’. Oh Puke.
We have a few years before we have to face this, but I will damned if we are going to pay to clean up the communist’s mess! Not gonna happen. They have made BILLIONS from this community, they should do the right thing and pay for cleanup and sell the land privately.
I guess we will find out more at the presser, but I have quite a few questions, like a timeline and what kind of handouts? If a new plant will be built in Foundation Park, they are already getting a TIF, so who will pay for the cleanup of the old plant? The Feds? The State? The City? These communists have made billions from us, they should pay to clean up the land, and sell it to developers. I guess we will find out how much this ‘generational change’ is going to cost us.
UPDATE: I figured perusing some DTSF bars tonight I would be able to dig up this announcement. I did. But I promised my source I would not reveal, but if you contact me personally, I will tell you. It is actually something most SF residents have wanted to have happen for a very long time. Also, the irony is I thot about this morning on a ride, ‘Maybe it is this?’ and I laughed and said to myself ‘Pipe dream’. Like I said, very positive for the community, but my concern is what will it cost taxpayers? It is so huge, we will have to partake, but how much? Also I heard the deal was inked by Rhoden and forced onto Poops, which should not shock anyone. The only drawback besides us bailing out this adventure is the transition will actually cut hundreds of jobs, but in a good way?
——————
We don’t have the tax revenue in Sioux Falls to make a generational change, and neither does Pierre.
So all week I was looking forward to just going out to a party on Friday night to hang out with friends and NOT talk about Sally or any politics. As I am walking out the door I get a text about Rhoden and Ten Haken’s ‘Generational Change’ coming to Sioux Falls and the announcement Monday morning. My guess is this was cooked up over the last couple of weeks because I know so many leaks in the Sioux Falls city government sinking ship that I would have been told what it was already.
So after the first text my phone started to blow up. ‘What is this?’ or ‘I think it is this.’ I gotta tell yah, I don’t have a freaking clue, but as I had discussions with folks we created theories and here are the TOP three;
• Convention Center
• Data Center
• Dumpling Factory
Heck, they might come out on all 3! Who knows. My top guess, and I am hoping one of my leakers fills me in before Monday, is the state will help fund a convention center thru low interest state loans. But how is this a generational change? It is not. A DATA center farm may be closer to a generational change, but that is also odd. And who can forget the millions the state and city gave away to bring in a dumpling factory that pays slave wages.
Just once I would love a politician to come to the podium and announce real change that doesn’t cost taxpayers a penny and is completely transparent. Who am I kidding?
How can you come out with such a huge announcement that has been shrouded in secrecy and expect people to get behind it? Rhoden is running for governor and if you see his latest poll numbers he may come in 4th in the primary and he is grasping at anything. Policy changes not expenditures make generational change. Throwing tax dollars into a burn barrel is not change, it is stupidity. But hey, a duck is a duck, and these ducks are walking us off a cliff.
What do you think it is? And if you have evidence showing exactly what this is, please send it to me, would love to make the announcement before them.
I’ve asked this question many times from city officials, never get an answer. You would think the city would share with the citizens what they are doing with the data? Because as you can see, it can be VERY useful for city government;
It can be very helpful to the public collecting and analyzing that data. In fact the city thinks it is so helpful the salary budget for the department is around $1 Million a year;First off, the obvious. If the city is collecting data on citizens, that needs to be shared quarterly on the city website. Secondly, we need to be told what the data was used for and how it has improved our lives or made the city more efficient. I don’t think the city is using it for that. When you have corporate executive raises and over $100 million in no bid contracts, it seems to me the city isn’t depending on the data to much, because if they were, things would be a lot more efficient and fiscally responsible.
So why the secrecy and what do I speculate the data is being used for? I think ‘certain’ folks in the city are siphoning the data in some kind of quasi legal way. What could you use that data for? Well, any business owner that provides a service in town would eat that stuff up, so it could be sold, but not sure how they could get away with that. I do know the data is shared with other communities, which is good, and it could be siphoned off that way also. But my bigger concern is that a political campaign consultant got their hands on the data, it could be VERY beneficial when cross-referencing voter lists. I am NOT making any accusations, but it sure seems curious to me that the city spends a million a year to collect data on us and never shares it (accept on this terrible search engine that reminds me of Yahoo, 2003). Somebody is using it, while we are paying to collect it.
l3wis 
