Secretary of State Johnson in deep doo-doo

Besides breaking state and federal laws, you have to question if she acted alone;

On July 31, The ACLU of South Dakota sent a letter (see attached) to the Secretary of State’s office demanding they remove publicly available copies of the statewide voter registration file that make it possible to identify which voters registered at public assistance offices while applying for assistance programs. On August 1, the Secretary of State’s office complied with our demands to remove the data pertaining to where a voter registered and notify all impacted voters by mail. 

This was an egregious violation of voters’ privacy rights. These privacy rights are guaranteed under state and federal law, including the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA”)

I don’t think it takes the average bear to figure out Johnson isn’t intelligent enough to have acted alone on this. She would have had to have the backing of the Attorney General. It will be interesting to see what heads will roll on this, besides Johnson. As for the act itself, whoever is guilty, not only is it a violation of state and federal law, it probably violates several ethics laws, but besides all that it, it is extremely despicable, but not surprising since our entire state government has been taken over by the Trump Administration who has a very racist agenda.

Today at Freeman Chislic Festival had a “conversation” while still maintaining a good “relationship” with Dusty Johnson (Guest Post, Frank Kloucek)

Dislike it intensely  when people use the words “I had a conversation with”, “We will have conversations”

and the words “We have a “relationship” or “we have a good working relationship”

“We are having or plan to have conversations etc.”

All the years we participated in public service when people used those words it usually meant someone was going to get shafted [in a non-physical way of course] very badly.

In other words someone was going to “use someone” to get what they want.

What words can we use in your opinion can be said to mean the same as “conversation and relationship” without the negative connotation of those words????

Please let me know asap so I can substitute other, better, more positive words to replace conversation and relationship” in my vocabulary and ask others to do the same..

On the brighter side enjoyed good Chislic at Freeman Chislic Festival today. What a wonderful event!!!!

Also, briefly interrupted  Congressman “Half Dusty” Johnson’s campaigning tactics twice today.

Had the opportunity to give him a hard time today about his bill to fast-track the CO2 pipelines while he and his staffer were lining people up for photo ops

[in a cordial way of course…….]

and then again questioned his votes to cut funding to public education and public broadcasting

[in a cordial way of course…….]

right after he got done serving beer at the Firemen’s Beer booth

at the Freeman Chislic festival today in Freeman.

Half Dusty truly has become a smooth false prophet, sad to say……………….

SF Simplified guide to local government

Megan has been busy compiling a guide to local government, and I have been impressed. But, with my passion for the 1st Amendment, I do have to correct some of her recommendations;

• Sign in before the meeting.

You only have to do this at the School Board meeting, (it is voluntary at the county commission, and not required at Carnegie.) They will also ask what topic you are going to talk about. I usually write, ‘General School Board Policy’. I don’t care to tell the school board what I am talking about in advance because they are famous for interrupting you and cutting you off during uncomfortable topics, they are 10X worse then Poops. While I have spoken at hundreds of public meetings, I am still intimidated at school board meetings, they don’t make it very welcoming to attend or speak.

• Have some talking points prepared. Your time is limited, so jot down your main thoughts and ideas before going up to speak.

YES! YES! YES! Come prepared, or at least prepared in your head. There is this frequent public commenter at ALL local government meetings I have coined as Mr. BobbleBlabber. He has no clue what he is talking about and is pulling directly from his ass. Don’t be that guy.

• State your name clearly before you start talking. If you forget, someone will remind you. You may also be asked to state your address or use it to sign in before the meeting.

You don’t have to give your address, or even what town you live in, heck, you don’t even have to give your name, but if you do, use your real one. Anonymous free speech is protected by the 1st Amendment, and unless you want to be on the permanent record, don’t give any more information about yourself then you have to. (they already are spying on us with the new water meters) #makeepsteinconspiracygoaway

• Know that you likely won’t get a response. Councilors, board members, commissioners, etc. can’t speak to items that aren’t listed on the publicly posted meeting agenda, and while they do hear you, they won’t react or respond while you’re talking to maintain professionalism and keep things on track. It’s weird and a little awkward, but it’s the way local government works.

NO it is NOT. This is a recent thingy with local government. When I first started attending council meetings during Munson’s 1st term, the council interacted with the public, quite often. Like when Beninga told me to wear his shoes, and I told him he chose to wear those shoes. Or when Darin Smith told me they were putting a ‘package of ideas’ together closing down the Loop and I told him, ‘This isn’t a McDonald’s Combo meal.’ Good times. Either way, it all got changed when that last clown ran the city, not the current clown. I have pressured council since to change it back, because I believe public input would be less volatile if there was interaction from the council.

In an earlier post Megan also mentions ‘Robert’s Rules’. These are ACTUAL procedural rules during a meeting, but they generally don’t apply to the public, only those on the dais (council, mayor, staff) in keeping order in the house. Being an un-elected member of the public voluntarily coming to the meeting doesn’t require you to follow Robert’s, but if you do become unruly, the council does have the right to shut you down.

Like I said, it is a great intro to local government and I encourage everyone to read it. I just wish I could take the quiz, but it is only for subscribers 🙁

The Problem with Erik Muckey

Representative Muckey has been blabbing anywhere he can about how he voted against the property tax cut, then in the next breath complains about TANF cuts. There would be less people on TANF if their property taxes weren’t so high.

I don’t care if you are Indy, Repug or a Demorat, you NEVER vote against a tax cut. NEVER! Political suicide. Was this property tax perfect or even fair? No. But it was a starting point for more adjustments, like fixing our assessor system.

We know why he voted against a property tax cut; Teacher pay. The tired old argument Dems haul out when they are running for office. Do you know who cares about teacher pay? Teachers, and a couple of Dems in the legislature. That’s it.

I have made the same argument to legislators over and over again, which usually falls on deaf ears; Teacher pay in SD is reflective of other professional salaries in the private sector, for example, nursing. South Dakota is almost dead last for nursing pay. There are many other professional fields that are below the national average in South Dakota. I’ve said the best way to raise wages for teachers is to raise wages for professionals in the private sector. When they make more, they buy bigger houses, and pay more in property taxes which raises teacher pay. This isn’t rocket science folks. A good start would be presenting legislation that eliminates all of our right to work state laws.

I’m not sure who is Erik’s audience on this one? Kadyn? But you never vote against a tax cut. NEVER! And you especially don’t brag about it after the fact. Have you written your political obituary yet?