January 2011

Seems someone in local government has been listening to Detroit Lewis

As I said back in December, we can remodel the Arena and make it a better useable facility without building a new events center. And it seems I am not the only one who thinks so;

As the city of Sioux Falls continues developing its plan for a new events center and a future public vote, Jamison is working on an alternate plan in case voters balk at the idea. He thinks residents might support a downtown convention center, a recreation center at the current convention center, and a remodeled Arena.

While I don’t agree entirely with Greg’s plan, I will say we agree on remodeling the Arena, and I am not the only one. Greg and I had a very lengthy phone conversation on the topic several months ago, so this isn’t something he cooked up overnight from the advice of a knee-jerking blogger. During the phone convo Greg assured me that him and I are not the only ones who think this is a good idea. While I do agree that building a new Convention Center downtown is a great idea (maybe next to Cherapa) I would ‘tweak’ his rec center idea just a bit.

But Jamison said he’s heard from residents who want an indoor pool and from private sports clubs wanting more space. He thinks there is support for his approach, which would be a private-public partnership where both the city and private sports clubs invest in the convention center to transform it into a recreation center.

I agree, there should be private partnership, BUT I think the only public involvement is gifting the Convention Center to the private groups and let them remodel it, own it, run it and subsidize it on their own. I would even go farther and let them be exempt from property taxes and allow them to use the city owned parking lot at no charge. I think it is time the city finally pulled that bandaid off and stop holding the hands of special interest club sports that want handouts from the city.

This quote from Greg also stood out in the story;

“I believe during these economic conditions, it is better to remodel the Arena than to build a brand new events center,” he said.

That was actually the focus of the convo we had. Greg actually confessed to me that it is the job of the city to take care of infrastructure and city services first in this economic downturn. He pretty much said this exact same quote to me. Some used to be hard on Staggers for saying things like this, and accused him of not being ‘visionary.’ I think anyone who uses taxpayer’s money wisely to provide better services to citizens is truly a visionary. I think when we have people suggesting we use fruitcake to fill potholes, we have to question how city funds are being used.

But these two statements in the Stormland TV News version of this story shows just how out of touch Councilor Jim Entenman and Mayor Huether are;

“I agree with Greg, we are short a lot of those facilities in our city. There’s no doubt about it. However, the previous two task forces have identified a need for an events center too,” city council member Jim Entenman said.

Notice what Jim said, “task forces identified a need.” Not the citizens. This still hasn’t been brought to a vote. And I have often asked, “What are they afraid of?” Failure? Not according to Huether;

Mayor Mike Huether says the city needs to stay focused on an events center. Huether told KELOLAND News, “Effective leadership will keep us focused on the goal at hand, and that’s building a new events center.”

Effective leadership would have been developing a funding solution for a proposed EC first, and put it to a vote. If approved, move forward with location and design. The events center planning is like a merry-go-round that won’t let the citizens on for the ride. Real leaders listen to the public. They don’t ramrod their ideas down citizen’s throats, that’s not leadership, that’s fascism.

Argus Endorser? Liberal rag? Yeah . . . right.

I watched this dull video which was void of any competing opinions (all four legislators interviewed were Republicans). I have often laughed when people have called the Argus Endorser a liberal rag. LOL. They are neither a liberal rag or conservative cheerleader. They however will tow any line they need to push THEIR agenda on certain topics (Events Center, etc). And if that mean sucking up to Republican lawmakers, they will do it. That is what is so amazing about this video, they had four Republicans right where they needed them. They had to answer questions without pointing fingers at the Democratic boogeymen. Instead, they threw one softball after another. I have often blamed the mainstream media for the shape our country is in, they have sold their souls to advertising and no longer hold politicians accountable. Remember when people bought newspaper’s for the ‘NEWS’? Me neither.

Sioux Falls City Councilor Jim Entenman makes some very strange statements about city contracts

While I’m on the fence about whether the city council should have a say in city contracts, I always find the quotes entertaining from councilors;

“At some point of time, I think we are delving too deep into something,” he said. “I don’t want to be responsible for buying toilet paper.”

Toilet paper? I thought the city only bought tissues for Mike’s crying bouts?

By having the contracts listed on the agenda, taxpayers can see how the city is spending its money and local contractors can find out about business opportunities with the city, Brown said.

“I don’t need to know every contract, but maybe there’s one on the list that I’m interested in,” Brown said.

I would even go a step farther and post this stuff, daily. I have often said that the city should have a daily news website. We spend millions on media services and Channel 16, would it be so hard to maintain a city website page that had daily updates on city business and a forum. I have actually had this idea for a long time. If Kermit would have won, I was going to pitch it to him.

In the 1990s, city commissioners approved contracts on the consent agenda, where councilors approve the items in one vote without discussion.

Why that changed is unknown, City Clerk Debra Owen said.

Now, the council will approve some contracts and not others. No threshold has been established.

This just proves how disjointed our city charter is, it seems it is up for interpretation depending on who is in office. And we sit around and wonder why the city has so many lawsuits against them. Two pending with the SD Supreme Court (that they will probably lose).

Assistant City Attorney Karen Leonard said that as a general rule, the directors decide which contracts to bring to the council for a vote. Those that the council doesn’t approve are signed off by other city officials and reviewed by the city attorney’s office.

The City Charter doesn’t address the issue, but state law says, “No contract of a municipality is valid unless the contract has been authorized by a vote of the governing body …”

Oh, look at that, the city is trying to trump state law, once again. Will they ever learn?

Public Works Director Mark Cotter expressed concern that requiring council approval would slow the process of getting a project started. The state routinely takes 15 days for the contract process, while the city sometimes uses up to 30 days, he said.

“If we extend that out to 45 to 60 days, it’s going to affect the execution of that project,” Cotter said.

OMG! LMFAO! Since when is the city concerned about ‘timeframes’? This reminds me of when Munson had to approve a 100% budget increase on Phillips to the Falls in the middle of the night because time was of the essence. Years later, the city still owns the property. Funny how these things are time sensitive when misdeeds are going on, but take forever when it will improve citizen services (IE; Snowgates, infrastructure).

The council is responsible for approving the budget and authorize the spending, Entenman said.

“At some point in time, we have to trust the 1,200 employees and let them do their job. If they don’t do their job, we fire them,” he said.

Jim makes me laugh. Classic bully. He seems to live in some fantasy world that when city employees fuck up, they get fired. Yeah, it only took the city 16 years to fire Tornow, so he is probably right. I remember several years ago when I worked for a small print shop (my first job out of technical school) Mr. Entenman was one of our clients. His deadlines were ridiculous with his newsletter, but we always met them, but one time he flipped a lid to our boss because we couldn’t turn a newsletter in one day (layout, print, mail). He even suggested that we suck as employees and should be reprimanded or fired. This has stuck with me over the years, and has taught me one thing about Councilor Entenman; just another greedy person in politics who is watching their own back.

I also want to touch on Jen Holsen’s defense of the city’s policy, like a typical beauracrat she defends the current system, citing city ordinance (which is unconstitutional on ten million different levels);

It seems clear to me, at least, that contract authority and administration rests with the mayor and his administration.  To pursue changing this process so the council can approve city contracts is not good business sense and will certainly bog down the business of the city.

Oh, how sweet, just like a good city employee director lap dog, she bows down like Mark Cotter did and claims ‘Time is of the essence.’ Like I have said before, the city council should be a check and balance against the mayor and his directors. If they do not have the power to be that, why have them at all?

Casino owners still bitchin’ about the smoking ban

And now they have a whiney ass legislator on their side;

“People aren’t coming and that’s just a fact of life. We’ve noticed it almost immediately in the middle of November when the smoking ban started,” Republican Senator Tom Nelson of Lead said.

Good. Gambling is a poor way to fund government anyway, and maybe we will be killing two birds with one stone.

Video lottery revenues in the state have fallen off nearly 20 percent since the ban passed. And, just in November officials say the casinos in Deadwood saw a $10 million drop in revenues, attributing the fall completely to the smoking ban.

Why not raise the state’s take? I have often said that if a majority of South Dakotans think gambling is okay, we should increase the state’s take to 70-80%. It has often amazed me that all of these legislators have come up with 9 million different ways to nickel and dime citizens in user fees but not one single one of them has suggested taking more from gambling.

“It’s not the economy. It’s not the weather. It’s not the holidays. We’re comparing Novembers to Novembers to Novembers,” Nelson said.

Yeah, Tom, because the economy has been just peachy. Video lottery revenue has been down all year, even before the ban. It is the economy, stupid.

“We don’t need a complete lift of the smoking ban. We just need some accommodations so customers have a place to go where they can continue to play their machines or be at the card table,” Nelson said.

Oh, so because they have card tables, they deserve to have smoking? But if you are some dive bar with VL machines you have to keep the ban? Silly. The ban should remain, for ALL establishments. The citizens voted in an overwhelming majority that they wanted this to happen. We have a clear mandate. Besides, this is not about patrons, it’s about workers. How many times do we have to go over this?

Will the legislature try to amend this? Probably. Just like abortion, there are a few knuckle heads in the legislature who think they know better then the majority of South Dakota voters. But remember this, these are the same guys who don’t pay property taxes, molest foster kids, launder money and run stop signs resulting in killing someone.

I DARE the legislature to challenge the will of the people.