June 2012

Obesity in America

While I did not want to revisit this topic (or were we talking about art?) I did want to clarify my position on overweight people (a category I belong to – I also belong to the short and angry categories).

While I do agree obesity can occur due to physical or mental issues which can stem from childhood abuse or other relationship problems, I still DO NOT categorize all obesity occurs due to these issues. I believe most people are overweight due to lack of self control, lack of exercise, stress and diet.

It is easy for people to find ‘comfort’ in food. Like I have said in the comments section, I have worked in restaurants long enough to see the same people, week after week eat large amounts of food for no apparent reason accept to eat large amounts of food.

The most harmful thing about obesity is the effect it is having on our healthcare costs;

In 2008, medical costs associated with obesity were estimated at $147 billion; the medical costs paid by third-party payors for people who are obese were $1,429 higher than those of normal weight.

It also doesn’t help we made it in this top 10 list;

Known for its Restaurant Report Cards that rate quick-serve restaurantsaccording to their most and least healthiest menu items, Men’s Health magazine’s September issue includes a list of 100 U.S. cities graded by their number of QSRs.

Arlington, Texas, was given the title of Fast Food Capital of America, followed by Anchorage, Alaska, Charlotte, N.C.; Sioux Falls, S.D.; Raleigh, N.C.; Indianapolis; Fremont, Calif.; Jacksonville, Fla.; Lexington, Ky.; and Wichita, Kan., according to a blog by Dermot Cole in Fairbanks Daily News-Miner. The cities were ranked based on the number of fast-food places per capita and research data on the popularity of those dining establishments.

So while you may disagree with my sense of humor when it comes to obesity, trust me, it is self-depricating and not directed at anyone in particular. And if you don’t think America has a serious problem when it comes to obesity, I encourage you to take a good hard look in the mirror, preferably with your clothes off.

Why is the city switching consultants on naming rights for the EC?

And what happened to the $60,000 we gave to the Superlative Group (FF to 54:00)? PDF of Presentation: naming

And still, the grand mystery of naming rights;

The city council will also have to make a multi-million dollar decision involving naming rights for the facility.

The city isn’t saying much about that process, only that progress to secure a sponsor is being made.  They hope to have something in place by August, ahead of the groundbreaking.

Like I said above, what happened to Superlative, why are we using Legends now? Kermit asked about the Superlative agreement, and Smith said that they were similiar, but all Superlative did was ‘evaluate’ if our opportunities for naming rights was there – then Legends moves forward on the naming rights.

Huh? As Kermit said, Why not just use Superlative to do the naming rights since they did the evaluation? Darrin said they changed their minds and chose another firm. Then Erpenbach accused Staggers of ‘asking too many questions.’ WTH? Then she said he asked four questions and no one else asked any questions, then nobody does, except Rolfing making a statement and Jamison making a few comments.

I guess someone overheard Erpenbach telling Staggers after the meeting there is a procedural rule that limits them to two questions. I hope Staggers looks into this, because that is a load of crap.

The best part of the meeting was when Huether came up and told Staggers that he basically needed to play catchup and he could question any of the directors anytime he wanted to (in other words, not in a public meeting). Kermit responded that he felt it was a very good meeting with lots of interaction (in other words, we need to ask these questions in public.)