April 2018

On the Road with Tim Bjorkman

Tim spoke at a Town Hall event organized by Indivisible 605 and Indivisible Common Grounds at the Icon Event Hall + Lounge in Sioux Falls where he addressed some of the critical issues we face as a state and nation, gave an update about the campaign, and responded to audience questions on a wide variety of issues. Tim and Kay also spent time in Madison for a fundraiser, visiting the courthouse, library, DSU campus, and KJAM Radio where he had an interview with Sue Bergheim! Catch him this weekend at the SDDP McGovern Day dinner and next weekend at the Custer County Democrats’ Roosevelt-McGovern Day Rally!

Saturday, April 28th:

Speaking at South Dakota Democratic Party McGovern Day, 7:00pm

Ramkota Convention Center

3200 W Maple

Sioux Falls, SD 57107

Find tickets & the full weekend schedule at: www.sddp.org

Wednesday, May 2nd:

Lake Andes campaign stop, 12:00pm

Lake Andes Lakers Lunch

Tim will spend the morning and afternoon in Wagner

Thursday, May 3rd:

Brookings fundraiser, 5:00pm

Mama Mia

1300 Main Avenue S

Brookings, SD 57006

Friday, May 4th:

Kadoka courthouse

Kimball business district

Lyman County Courthouse

Custer downtown

Saturday, May 5th:

Custer County Democratic Party Roosevelt-McGovern Day Rally, 11:000am

Rocky Knolls Golf Course

Sunday, May 6th:

Custer, Hill City

Public Input belongs to the Public, not the mayor or council

So if Paul becomes mayor he thinks he is going to make some changes;

TenHaken said establishing a sign-up sheet for those wishing to address the City Council, potentially reducing the five minute time allotment, enforcing a code of conduct for everyone at meetings and designating seats in the Council chamber for those who’ve signed up to speak.

First off, Public Input belongs to the public. Secondly, the mayor has ZERO power in changing the rules at public input, that is the council’s job.

I will not sign a sign up sheet, and I will not sit in a designated area. Public input belongs to the public. We own this government and the agenda, not the mayor or council. I will not have goofy rules put on my 1st Amendment rights.

When people are acting up, you gavel them and ask them to leave or escort them out by security.

It is already intimidating enough for people to come and speak, we don’t need to make that process harder for EVERYONE because a few bad apples called the mayor names when HE wasn’t following his own rules of conduct.

I refuse to take a number and be called on like a person waiting at the DMV. And if Paul or the Council think they are going to thru with these changes there will be the biggest revolt they have ever seen, and it won’t involve respect or decorum.

UPDATE III: FORMER Argus’ ED Board member Co-Chairs TenHaken’s Campaign

UPDATE III: Ding! Ding! Ding! And the winner is . . .

As the May 1 election approaches, those distinctions have been drawn. It is our conclusion that TenHaken’s experience and leadership qualities make him the best choice to succeed Mike Huether as the city’s next mayor.

Shocker!!! Oh, but the Argus wanted to reassure us no funny business is going on;

Editor’s note: Though community at-large members are a key part of the mission of the Argus Leader editorial board, such members were not part of the discussions involving this endorsement.

So Stu Whitney and Cory Myers endorsed Paul. That makes me feel comfortable.

UPDATE II: From Cory Myers;

Hi Scott, all – Michelle is a former community member of the Argus editorial board. She was not part of any editorial board discussions concerning the mayoral candidates, nor any board discussions since December of 2017.

How fun it was for Cory Myers to cry about transparency yesterday;

But specifically for a campaign so focused on transparency, I see no reason why Loetscher won’t release this voicemail.

You mean like when you (didn’t) release this information before the general election when your editorial board endoresed TenHaken and Loetscher;

Oh, that’s right, you didn’t bother telling your readers.

Ironically, TenHaken is the one that scooped this on his FB page. So the Argus ED Board, who has a FORMER member that is assisting TenHaken’s campaign, was endorsing TenHaken.

WOW! Let’s talk ‘transparency’ Cory.

Can’t wait to see if the Argus endorses TenHaken before Tuesday. Cory might have to do a lot of explaining to his far away boss in Denver and the execs at Gannet. Or maybe this is just par for course?

Why not endorse Donald Duck? It would seem less ridiculous.

Sioux Falls City Council not told about important events

So yesterday the Chamber of Commerce sends out notices of events. Two important events pop up;

May 7, Groundbreaking of Downtown Parking Ramp &

May 10, Administration Building Ribbon Cutting

I asked 3 city councilors today if they knew about the obvious last minute events before Mike leaves office. None of them had heard anything before I told them.

Keeping it transparent all the way to the end.

No wonder the mayor didn’t want to take questions at Dem Forum today. Oh, but one lady did ask one after the mayor said the per capita debt in SF is lower then the rest of the region. This lady yells out quickly, “What is that amount?” And Mike replies, “I don’t know.”

May 15th can’t come soon enough.

Voter Disenfranchisement (Guest Post, Bruce Danielson)

The solution for the Absentee ballot arrival problem would have been an easy fix. It is a simple process if official ballots could not arrive in time. How do I know this? I do not know how many elections I have been a volunteer but I have been involved in the process for 52 years in South Dakota. You can learn a few things if you want to.

Let’s consider what could have been done by a real election organizer:

1. The original ballot order could have reserved space in the production line for a Run-off election.

2. A tentative ballot order could have been placed election night to reserve a spot in the production line. 

3. Laser or quick copy service printed absentee ballots on plain paper could have been sent out immediately upon the City Council canvas one week after the election. In a properly organized election day, the process requires individuals on a Resolution Board to copy the vote selections to a proper ballot under similar situations.

The City Council of Sioux Falls has had a policy of hiring or relying on a Certified City Clerk for decades. The City Clerk is the Chief Election Officer of the City of Sioux Falls. As the Chief Election Officer, the Clerk has full responsibility for all city election functions; including the ballots, polling locations and the counting of the ballots.

The County Auditor is only hired to run the counting machines, NOTHING more, it’s in the contract. So if something is screwed up, don’t blame Litz.

When City Clerk Greco was hired in 2016. When his appointment was rumored, I discovered there was no record showing him as a registered voter. He had admitted he had not voted in “decades” or since he lived on the east coast. So, our Mayor and his staff arranged for questionably qualified person to be hired over others who were already certified and ready to continue working.

Remember the election 2012-2014 issues our county and town were experiencing? To their credit, the County Commission decided something needed to be done to find a way to fix the problems caused by the population growth, software changes, Secretary of State shenanigans and equipment failures. The decision was to appoint a group of seven voters to a Minnehaha County Election Review Committee to study the problems and come up with solutions. Over the behind the scene objections of Mayor Mike Huether, the members selected me to be Chairman.

Our group met in public with the video cameras running, to compile suggestions leading to a report of repairs to the systems. Our process suggestions have been proven to work when implemented.

Failure of the counting process in 2016 was Greco’s baptism under fire when the recommendations of the Minnehaha County Election Review Committee were rejected by him. The April city election day was a major failure when the broken processes were once again used and we once again had to endure the mess.

Now we have a screw-up based on lack of forethought and planning causing another disenfranchisement of voters. Why can’t Sioux Falls have someone in charge who understands why elections are important to its citizens and democracy?

No, should we bring up the lack of Saturday voting? What’s the deal? Oh yes, more business as usual: disenfranchisement.