Citizens for Reponsible Sales Tax

So we raise taxes so we can stick the money in reserves?

On Friday, Mayor Munson had an interview with Don Jorgensen in which he bragged about being able to put $5 million dollars in savings from 2008 into the reserves;

Last year, they budgeted $110 million for operating expenses, but spent only $105 million, sending $5 million back into the reserve fund. 

So why did we have to raise taxes to a full 2% to get additional money if it was there, even without cutting one single program from the 2009 budget?

One word; Greed.

Like I have argued with many people, the city has gotten by just fine with 1.92% tax rate for years, as you can see, we had an additional $5 million leftover.

Not only was this tax increase greedy and a handout to special interests that fund some of city leader’s campaigns, it an example of incredibly poor management, but we are starting to get use to that from SD politicians, aren’t we?

A penny saved is a penny earned. That’s not silly – it’s smart

I have a coffee can I fill with pennies, most people do. When it is full I hike it to the bank and cash it in. It usually comes to about $17. Pennies add up, in the city’s case it adds up to about $5 million with the new tax increase that took affect January 1, 2009. Our tax initiative, if passed, will let taxpayer’s keep that $5 million to spend how they wish which will most likely go back into the economy in the form of goods and services that helps all local businesses not just contractors who pave gravel roads outside of rural Tea (that is where these arterial roads are being proposed).

Is saving taxpayers $5 million dollars silly? Argus Leader columnist Hawkins seems to think so. In her column, titled ‘Stupid, silly stuff trumps violence any day’ (only in the dead tree version of the Argus today) she says this;

“But when one realizes that the fight is over less than a penny, yes less than a penny, I feel like responding like Izzie or Meredith or Cristina in “Grey’s Anatomy.” “Seriously?”

Maybe instead of watching a boring TV series, Hawkins should do a little research about taxation, citizen rights and the TRUE duty of the Fourth Estate instead of defending politicians (and advertisers) that spend wastefully. Now that is silly. And they wonder why subscriptions are down. Go figure.

Yesterday when I was collecting signatures, I rareley got a no. Most people agreed, the city is spending too much money, and it’s time for citizens to step in and put a halt to it. Not one single person mentioned to me the small amount it is to there personal finances. I think most people who agree with our drive agree when you give politicians an inch, they will take foot. When we give our mayor .08 cents, he takes $5 million out of the entire SF business community and hands it over to a select few, ironically the very few who fund our city leader’s campaigns. Coincidence? I don’t think so.

UPDATE: Mayor Munson himself points out why a tax increase is not needed, lots-o-money!

Sioux Falls Councilor Jamison shows true colors

“We are not going to negotiate anything with these guys! If they have a statement they want to share with us then let’s get it on!” Councilor Greg Jamison wrote in an e-mail to his colleagues on the City Council and Mayor Dave Munson. “No more games!”

 

As you can see, this is how are elected officials talk about it’s citizens behind closed doors. Like Bush and Rounds, Munson and Jamison have this mentality that once they are elected they can do anything they want. No surprise about Jamison, his father handed him the family business and his council seat, he owes everything to daddy, not the voters.

We are not the ones playing games, the city is.

During Monday’s informational meeting, councilor Knudson begged us to contact them ” . . . within 15 to 24 hours . . .” Then when we made an attempt to discuss it with the city, the above email is what we get? You are right, Jamison, we don’t play games.

When asked about his e-mail, Jamison said: “In the end, I am still committed to getting those bonds so we can get those levees built as soon as possible.”

“Real people die in floods,” he added. “Real families get wrecked for life. Not on my watch.”

Who is Jamison concerned will die? The employees of Granite City and Hollywood Video? I guess we live below sea level on the Gulf coast. Well, Greg, the last time the city flooded it wasn’t because of the lack of levees, it was the lack of a upkeep on our sewer system. The water didn’t come flooding out of the banks of the big Sioux, they came from the city’s poor sewer system.

Stehly said her group is equally committed to bringing the sales tax issue to voters. And with promises of federal money coming, the bonds might not even be necessary, she said.

“We care deeply about the financial health of our city,” she said. “We’re doing this because we care. We’re doing this for taxpayers.”

City officials acknowledge that a federal stimulus plan could include money for the flood project. Mark Cotter, the city’s director of public works, said the project is considered a “high priority” for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. But the city isn’t waiting to see. The bonds are scheduled to be sold in March so that construction can resume this spring.

“We really do need to continue moving this forward,” Munson said.

Munson just can’t wait a couple of months for an answer, instead he wants the taxpayer’s of this city to pay over $12 million in interest payments on a loan we may not need. The Feds (FEMA) created this problem, they should fix it.

I suspect if the FEDS do pony up, instead of paying off the bonds, I’m sure Munson will keep the money so he can build football fields and new monkey crappers at the zoo this Fall. He has the legal authority to do anything with the money now, because seven of the councilors gave him permission to borrow, borrow, borrow.

I ask, who do they represent? Not us.

And once again, the Argus Leader editorial board thinks borrowing money is a good idea;

As a matter of fact, the council is right on track in proceeding with its intention to sell $38 million in bonds in March in order to pay for a levee and flood control projects.

No, the council should have found alternative funding sources.

Things that make you go Hmmmm . . .

I had a revelation today after reading the story about the City Financial status in the Business Journal.

 

I think the bonding company is going to be charging higher interest rates NOT because of our petition drive but because of the 75% decrease in revenue growth last year, and that is why Finance Director Rowenhorst DID NOT present those numbers on Monday, but instead tried to pin it on us. When Jessica from the bonding company says the bonds will have a ‘story’ or ‘hair’ on them, I think there is several hairs involved, including  the economy and unemployment rate.