Mayor Subprime Mike Huether

Is Mayor Huether breaking open records laws by denying the public info on the Events Center

This morning I encouraged Mr. Hildebrand (Build it Downtown) to challenge mayor Huether on the issue, he sent him this email this afternoon;

Mayor Huether,

You are currently using $500,000 of public funds to study the location, feasibility and design of a future events center for Sioux Falls. Because of your use of public funds, the transparency and accessibility of information used to conduct these studies should be afforded to the public in a timely fashion.

SDCL 1-27 provides entitlement to information within government bodies, including the City of Sioux Falls. Specifically, under 1-27-1.3 the law is to be “liberally” construed “in order that the citizens of this state shall have the full right to know of and have full access of information on public finances of the government and the public bodies and entities created to serve them.”

Under SDCL 1-27-1.5 there are exceptions to the right to inspection and copying. Which exception are you relying on to prevent us from seeing the information we have requested?

I look forward to hearing back from you.

Steve Hildebrand, Co-Founder
Build it Downtown

Steve is not the only one who has been fishing for facts. Another resident has hinted to me that they will probably file a complaint with the open meetings commission. Seems Mike is about as transparent as a piece of coal.

Huether to pat himself, uh I mean, city government on the back today

So what do you think he will list as ‘City government’s accomplishments’?

SIOUX FALLS, SD – Sioux Falls Mayor Mike Huether will announce Thursday what he considers to be the top ten accomplishments for city government during 2010.

Huether says he wants to reflect on the achievements of the 1,100 city employees.  In addition to the top 10 accomplishments, each department will also be recognized for its own top five accomplishments of the year.

The list will be released at 1:30 p.m. in the City Hall Commission Room.

This outta be good. Let’s start our own list.

Let’s play some softball with the Mayor

“Thanks Reed for the question.” (use your imagination and pretend the monkey is holding a softball instead of a baseball)

Am I the only one that thinks Ask the Mayor has turned into a softball session with host Reed Holsen? It almost seems like Mike sends the questions to Reed that he wants him to ask. He answers them too quick. He seems Hell bent on defending himself against the media reports. His latest episode was pathetic. I feel sorry for Reed. I’m surprised Mike doesn’t open the show with Reed bringing him a cup of coffee and polishing his shoes.

Has the publisher of the Argus Endorser folded to outside pressure?

The Argus Endorser’s publisher’s column today was all over the map. I don’t even know where to begin. Let’s just sum up this hot mess really quickly;

1) Beck supported a downtown events center, but not now, because old ladies will stop reading his paper.

2) We need an events center because we are tired of talking about it.

3) We need an events center now, but let’s not vote on it now, because people are very poor, and that is not very nice, to people, or poor people (who will never ever use the facility).

4) Stop picking on Mike Huether. We need to support his vision, even if it sucks.

5) We need private donors.

Looks like Beck is becoming a real pushover in his old age.

Seems someone in local government has been listening to Detroit Lewis

As I said back in December, we can remodel the Arena and make it a better useable facility without building a new events center. And it seems I am not the only one who thinks so;

As the city of Sioux Falls continues developing its plan for a new events center and a future public vote, Jamison is working on an alternate plan in case voters balk at the idea. He thinks residents might support a downtown convention center, a recreation center at the current convention center, and a remodeled Arena.

While I don’t agree entirely with Greg’s plan, I will say we agree on remodeling the Arena, and I am not the only one. Greg and I had a very lengthy phone conversation on the topic several months ago, so this isn’t something he cooked up overnight from the advice of a knee-jerking blogger. During the phone convo Greg assured me that him and I are not the only ones who think this is a good idea. While I do agree that building a new Convention Center downtown is a great idea (maybe next to Cherapa) I would ‘tweak’ his rec center idea just a bit.

But Jamison said he’s heard from residents who want an indoor pool and from private sports clubs wanting more space. He thinks there is support for his approach, which would be a private-public partnership where both the city and private sports clubs invest in the convention center to transform it into a recreation center.

I agree, there should be private partnership, BUT I think the only public involvement is gifting the Convention Center to the private groups and let them remodel it, own it, run it and subsidize it on their own. I would even go farther and let them be exempt from property taxes and allow them to use the city owned parking lot at no charge. I think it is time the city finally pulled that bandaid off and stop holding the hands of special interest club sports that want handouts from the city.

This quote from Greg also stood out in the story;

“I believe during these economic conditions, it is better to remodel the Arena than to build a brand new events center,” he said.

That was actually the focus of the convo we had. Greg actually confessed to me that it is the job of the city to take care of infrastructure and city services first in this economic downturn. He pretty much said this exact same quote to me. Some used to be hard on Staggers for saying things like this, and accused him of not being ‘visionary.’ I think anyone who uses taxpayer’s money wisely to provide better services to citizens is truly a visionary. I think when we have people suggesting we use fruitcake to fill potholes, we have to question how city funds are being used.

But these two statements in the Stormland TV News version of this story shows just how out of touch Councilor Jim Entenman and Mayor Huether are;

“I agree with Greg, we are short a lot of those facilities in our city. There’s no doubt about it. However, the previous two task forces have identified a need for an events center too,” city council member Jim Entenman said.

Notice what Jim said, “task forces identified a need.” Not the citizens. This still hasn’t been brought to a vote. And I have often asked, “What are they afraid of?” Failure? Not according to Huether;

Mayor Mike Huether says the city needs to stay focused on an events center. Huether told KELOLAND News, “Effective leadership will keep us focused on the goal at hand, and that’s building a new events center.”

Effective leadership would have been developing a funding solution for a proposed EC first, and put it to a vote. If approved, move forward with location and design. The events center planning is like a merry-go-round that won’t let the citizens on for the ride. Real leaders listen to the public. They don’t ramrod their ideas down citizen’s throats, that’s not leadership, that’s fascism.