Update: I guess there was a HS cross country event at Paisley park today, so why can’t they run on unmulched grass? The Romans used to run races barefoot. So now I guess we fund HS sports thru parks tax dollars.
FIRST, THE POSITIVE: The Sioux Falls city council and Minnehaha County Commission restored 2026 funding for the Siouxland Librairies at their joint meeting today. Guess how much the mayor was cutting? A whopping $250K!!!! Yeah, a lot of coin for us mouth breathers but NOTHING to the city when you consider they have $80 Million in reserves (they are only required by ordinance to have about $50 Million cash on hand), but Poops has been stowing away money for his wet dream convention center). I was glad to see funding restored since all Poops cut was temp help wages.
I find it ironic that the mayor insists on nickel and diming citizen services while blowing MILLIONS on projects no one asked for (Sanford Wellness purchase and Jacobsen Plaza for example).
NOW FOR THE NEGATIVE: As I was commuting to work I decided to take the bike trail today and as I was riding thru Paisley Park I noticed the lawn had been freshly mowed. There were windrows (these are the piles of un-mulched grass that accumulate in ROWS) in the lawn. It was visible but NOT thick and would easily just disintegrate into the un-mowed grass with the next rain. So what did the Parks Department decide to do about these windrows? So there is this guy who drives down the bike trail with a tractor and a small blower he tows behind and he blows debris off of the trail. It’s a nice amenity and I appreciate it, just like the plowing of the trail in the winter. So this guy wasn’t blowing off the trail he was driving back and forth, North to South in the lawn blowing the windrows towards the East fence. My guess this would have taken at least 3-4 hours. So when the mayor talks about cutting essential services, maybe we need to cut the Parks budget, because apparently they have too much money to spend if they have a parks employee blowing grass around our parks (well, at least he was actually working unlike the parks worker who waters trees while reading a novel).
Also at thejoint meeting tonight if you FF to the end where there is public input, it is worth the watch. A woman came up, and very politely and professionally addressed them about property taxes, and she read them the riot act. It was amazing. She needs to come back to the city council meeting and do the same speech since the city’s TIFilicious desires are raising our taxes. She also recommended that TIFs and OPT-OUTS should only be approved by voters. DAMN TOOTIN! She was cut off by Dean Karsky (him and Beninga need to retire) because she called out Commissioner Joe Kipley personally* (you know, Mr. Conflict of Interest double dipping from taxpayers) and a comment he had made, and it was a doozy.
To be honest with you, public input really doesn’t matter anymore you might as well be talking to a floating turd in your toilet, you would get more of a response. The County, the Council and the School Board all have their votes in line and mind made up before they walk into that meeting, no amount of pleading or shaming will get them to change their votes. There have been on occasion a councilor will change on the fly, but not because of testimony. I felt sorry for the folks over the last few weeks who have shown up to speak for the first time about important issues like deportation and the homelessness only to get patronized by the mayor. Deaf ears folks.
*The council and commission have a rule(?) at their meetings that no one at the podium can call out elected officials or public employees by name or individually. Let’s just say it is a contrived rule probably in Roberts, but as far as the 1st Amendment is concerned, you can call out anyone you want to at the podium and all they can do is cry.
Any and all documents permitting the City of Sioux Falls or their contractor businesses, giving permission to modify the flow of the Big Sioux River and the falls in downtown Sioux Falls between 2015 to current.
I have been reviewing the materials received from the CORPS over the past month. The PERSONAL names of any parties involved have been redacted BUT, all other pertinent information was provided. What disappoints me the most (but not surprised) is that a constituent had to go to the Federal Government to get information about how the city is handling a local project. Since the city is working within a waterway controlled by the Feds this information really should be also provided by the city to the public, but was NOT. I don’t think it is the responsibility of the Feds to inform local constituents on projects our city is doing in concert with their pre-approvals. To get to this point took decades, and the public wasn’t really brought along on the process, as you will see in some of the docs I reviewed.
Some major concerns about the project;
• Who is funding this project? How much will it cost and what ‘fund’ is this coming out of (Ex: Jacobsen Plaza or Parks Department or Planning Department). I couldn’t figure out what city agency is handling this project. It seems to be Planning, but their is NO clear agency.
• Will it work? I find it troubling that this area has been almost the same for 100 years, and while Falls Park does flood almost yearly, you wonder if this will be a good flood control measure or will it just back water up towards the South and the East?
• How was historical and environmental mediation handled? (there was opposition to the project at first, but a solution was presented, just not sure what it was or how they came to the conclusion to proceed).
• It seems the project must still go thru final approval with the Feds once the project is completed and up until this point the only thing the city has gotten is pre-approval to proceed. In other words the Feds could institute major changes to the final project once the inspection is completed, or could have a ‘wait and see’ approach to see how it handles major floods/rains, etc.
These are images of the original ‘plans’ for the replacement that the city OR the CORPs initially called a ‘rehabilitation’ of the low head dam (it is NOT a rehab, it is a total replacement). Also notice the drawing of the dam is a straight line (this will come up later in the post).
Below is the IMPACT MAP which shows wetlands on the East Side. Before the CORPs signs off on the completion of the replacement of the dam, the city will have to create a new wetland area on the east side as requested by the CORPs.
Scope of work performed at or around Falls Park in coordination with the CORPs
As you can see from the diagram below, after the old dam was removed they made the replacement damn LOWER then the original;
As you can see below the State Historical Society (a state agency) had concerns about the adverse impacts of the dam replacement AGREEING with the CORPs, then offering to work on a solution (NOT sure what was resolved or how this recommendation got reversed) THIS IS the full SDSHS review;
Somehow the 6th Street bridge environmental review was also done before construction could be done on the bridge, and look at this wonderful soil sample they found below. As I have said in the past, almost all of the dirt and quartzite in this area of Falls Park is severely contaminated from years of chemical waste and river runoff only a few feet under the surface. It still amazes me that we continue to ‘pave over’ our beautiful Greenway instead of highlighting it’s natural beauty. I have suggested instead of all these super condos along the greenway we should put down a wide pea rock path that winds thru natural prairie flower gardens and other natural amenities, and the best part it only needs rain and sunshine to be maintained. With all the contamination under the ground in this area of DTSF you would think permanent structures would NOT be allowed by any government agency, state, local or Federal. This is why the Levitt shell is where it is, because of the massive contamination of that site, they can’t build a permanent structure on the grounds. Don’t think we have ground water issues in this area? Then why are they always tearing up the sprinkler system at the Levitt every year since it has been opened? It seems about once a month in the summer, they have some pipe torn up at the Levitt and the culprit is usually a leaky sprinkler system pipe;
Where we start running into issues is the original design of the replacement has been drastically changed. This is the original plan submitted to the CORPs;
As you can see, the replacement dam is supposed to run in a straight line from the banks of the Steel District to the old Queen Bee Mill structure, those plans have changed. Also notice the carve out around the pier below is about a foot higher then the rest of the dam on the North and South sides. I find it troubling that this was the solution concocted by the railroad, the city and the CORPs. If we get a major flood, like we do almost every Spring due to snow melt and rain, this pocket behind the pier will just fill with debris and tree trunks and I would assume rise up to cause issues with the bridge itself. Still scratching my head why the plans changed so drastically? Was this pier determined historical (built around 1900) and maybe the compromise the historical peeps were looking for? Which is also strange since other original piers were encased with concrete. Once the CORPs approves this I will be curious to see how this came about.
As you can see from the above picture they made a turn around the one pier (not sure why they didn’t just encase the Pier and put the dam up against it instead) they did encase two other piers to the east of this one;
Look at the almost ONE MILLION just to encase some Piers. While we have been ‘told’ that the Jacobsen Plaza project was $16 Million there was significant cost overruns with this dam replacement and we may never know how much it was. Apparently $16 Million wasn’t enough to install a water fountain that is level (I call it the Leaning Water Fountain of Jacobsen). The irony is if you go around to other parks in Sioux Falls that have had upgraded equipment over the past few years, much of the equipment is broken now. The electronics on the machines at Rotary Park haven’t worked for over 2 years (this park is only 3 years old). It makes you wonder if the entire parks budget was thrown at this entertainment superplex while cutting back on repairs and maintenance in other parks;
They also intend to build another observation deck over the flood gates next to the Queen Bill Mill;
The good news is it appears that the Feds only do a pre-approval so work can be done, but don’t sign off final approval until final inspection which I don’t think will be until the end of 2026 with all the extra dirt work they have to do;
I have been mystified by this project since it’s beginning and the lack of information I have gotten from the city. I have many more questions;
• Why was this called a ‘rehab’ by the city when it is a total replacement?
• Why did plans change to go around the pier instead of up against it?
• Why was only half the dam poured then an expensive coffer damn put in to complete the project (there seemed to be a long delay between the pouring of the first leg of the dam and putting in a coffer dam to complete the project)?
• What was the compromise between historical advisors and the changed plans?
• Where is the money coming from to replace this? The Railroad? The City? The Developer? The Feds?
• How are environmental concerns being mediated?
I will be curious if and when the CORPs signs off on this project. Because right now, it looks like a gigantic mess. I used to work construction, and it is common to change architectural and engineering renderings in the field so they will work with the project, but it seems this project didn’t have a clear objective from the beginning and they are making changes on the fly and this is why it is starting to look like a cobbled mess. I also found emails between private contractors, city employees and the Feds interesting. The Feds are always detailed and professional in their emails and only are interested in brass tacks, can’t say the same about the others involved with the project. I guess we will have to wait until the project is finished before we see positive results, but bringing the public along would help a lot.
In my humble opinion, I would not have handled it this way. No doubt the old dam needed to be fixed or replaced, but wouldn’t you have all the plans ready to go before putting shovels in the ground? I wonder how much all these delays are costing us? Hopefully this post will encourage the council to request a long informational on what is going on with the project, but that would require transparency 🙁
So the Pavilion, who is running the Lodge restaurant and bar at Jacobsen’s Plaza, has decided to go ‘cashless’. Not sure that is such a great idea considering a lot of people like to pay cash for a single cocktail or beer, but hey, I ain’t running the joint. So a compromise was to put in cash vending machines in the bathroom hallway (they also take credit cards). So I bought a pop with my debit card from the machine. According to the text on the machine there would be a 10 cent fee to use my card so the price would be $3.10. Well imagine my surprise when I just happened to look at my bank statement that night. They charged me $4.50! A $1.50 CC transaction fee! This is ridiculous. I already informed some city staff and hopefully they will address it.
UPDATE:Item #14, I guess we figured out why the city hasn’t continued demolishing the MX Liquor property, looks like he owes some money;
This is silly, put a lien on the property if he doesn’t pay for demolition and when the property sells the city will get it’s money. That property is in an Opportunity ZONE and they could easily get over $1 million for it. It is prime property for apartments and with it being a OZ a developer could get gobs of Federal Tax breaks for building it. I would encourage the current owner to look for a buyer or find a developer and lease the property. The city can still demo the remaining properties even if he won’t pay right away, we will get the money on the back end, and they know it. Ironically, they gave $500K to demolish a couple of blocks for a religious non-profit that lied thru their teeth to get it done. I would suggest going after that money before we worry about a slumlord who simply refuses to pay (he has the money).
Item #23, While the Operations Committee meets on occasion (they meet tomorrow to talk about a separate issue) they are making changes to the operations manual without addressing it in a public meeting. One of the many changes is letting the Mayor appoint certain board members and employees without the consent of the council. Not sure why they are ceding more power to the mayor’s office, but it explains why they didn’t announce it to the public in a meeting before the council meeting.
Item #10, They are moving forward with 2nd reading of the ball field in Harrisburg sponsorship without a dollar amount attached to the sponsorship. I have asked several councilors and other involved ‘How much is the sponsorship?’ No answer. While I get that they may not have all the bids in to determine how much the upgrades will be, they CAN put a cap or a minimum on the sponsorship without having the actual costs. This is NOT being done. This is the first time I have seen a park sponsorship with NO DOLLAR amount of that sponsorship included. Tells me the sponsor is only paying for a sign and that’s about it, if NOT, prove me wrong, and give us a dollar amount at the 2nd reading. Not sure why this is so top secret?
Item #11, The city council is moving forward with the campground ordinance, not sure if it will pass, but I am sure they have at least 4 votes and the mayor’s tie to pass this. Once again the council is giving in to the SFPD instead of creating ordinances that require them to do their job. Just because someone is the Police Chief, appointed by the mayor, doesn’t mean they have all the solutions in solving homelessness and the council should take lightly any advice he may give in solving this problem. The council needs to implement policy (their only job) that forces the SFPD to fix this issue. If they don’t want to follow the new ordinances, show them the door.
Item #12, Oh, the irony of this funding;
This ordinance is to supplement for $8 million to procure motor graders (currently leasing) and $1.8 million in network technology equipment to build out the data center to ensure a reliable and redundant network.
So in order to save a couple million on snow removal we have to spend almost $10 million to take over the service. I sometimes wonder if the peeps making these decisions are mentally challenged. You will see snow removal becoming less effective and a lot slower, if at all. In order for drivers that work for the city’s public works department to plow streets they will have to work a lot of double shifts and overtime, and if we get a big storm, it will be virtually impossible for them to keep up or complete the job in a timely manner. It’s going to be a bad winter for snow removal because of this change, but not sure how it could get worse. Remember the current snow plow chief had over a 100 car accidents in one day because he had his de-icing crew on pothole duty while it was raining ice. Should have been fired due to the millions in insurance claims and damage that was incurred on this day last winter.
MX Liquor Property; This isn’t on the agenda because the city is being very secretive about it. I have asked people in public works, the city attorney’s office and the entire city council, ‘When will the remainder be demolished?’ The deadlines have passed and the properties look even worse then when this process started. So did the city drop the ball on this? Why are the properties still standing? When the next mayor is installed, and if those houses are still standing, I will approach them on day two of their job and get them to finish the job. I can’t believe it took 20 years and 3 different mayor’s to get this done, and the mayor doesn’t want to lay off any city employees because they are so valuable. LMFAO!
A few months back Cameraman Bruce (Danielson) and I were talking about all the missing information to the public about how the dam got approved and what process was happening to make this happen. In an ideal society that has a local government that is TRANSPARENT we would have had all that information, but not in Sioux Falls. So Bruce had the brilliant idea to do a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request from the Corp of Engineers for the project. While it took several months and 2.2 GB of information, the CORPS granted Mr. Danielson’s request. I have been sorting thru the materials for over a month and finally have them to where I can start posting about the process. There was many twists in turns in the process, including changing the direction of the design, water contamination, a refusal from the SD Historical Society (State Agency) and much more. While most of the materials are redacted of personal names, it is easy to determine who the contractors are, who the city employees are and who the CORPS are. The irony is any email or correspondence coming from the CORPS is extremely professional and detailed, city employees and especially the independent contractors NOT SO MUCH. It seemed they didn’t want to get the CORPS involved unless they ran into an issue. Which is odd since the CORPS won’t officially approve the project until it is finished, and that may not be until the end of next summer since after the dam construction is finished they have to create wetlands around the area to preserve the area AS IS.
What I have found fascinating is the city seems to be doing this by the seat of their pants and crossing their fingers it will work, which I believe has put the project over budget by at least $1 Million because of the poor planning and lack of concerted coordination with the CORPS. This city will never learn, when you do things in the OPEN you save the taxpayers money and it makes the process smoother. If they would have also made the process more open and brought the public along, there may have been members in our community who wanted to weigh in with ideas. I have often argued our city is full of smart folks who understand this stuff, if we would just ASK them. It reminds of the process when a group of citizens decided to tackle sustainability in Sux and all of the efforts and work turned into toilet paper Poops used to wipe his tight ass. We have experts in Sux, but instead we use leaders who are more concerned about selfies and jumping jacks then expert advice.
I hope to put up the materials by week’s end, it’s going to be a whopper of a post.
l3wis 
