snow removal

We will be hearing a lot about Snowgates this Fall

The below video is of an Ironex snowgate that the city tested two years ago. We are now going to test the Henke snowgate this winter (which is superior to the Ironex because it lifts straight up instead of swinging out, which is better because it eliminates the possibility of taking out mailboxes). I like the Ironex video though because it shows how snowgates work.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8nwa41y6sA[/youtube]

The great thing about possibly using snowgates in Sioux Falls for the entire city is that it is truly a ‘quality of life’ issue for ALL of the residents. Homeowners, apartment dwellers and businesses don’t have to worry about plowing out the ends of their driveways of their homes or parking lots. It truly benefits EVERYONE.

The biggest argument against snowgates is there expense, but when compared to the millions we are spending on entertainment and recreational projects in Sioux Falls, it is just a spit in the bucket. Using our tax dollars to provide an ACTUAL service to all the residents of Sioux Falls is a positive thing. We have the money, that is according to our mayor and several city councilors who continually support spending our tax dollars on other ‘quality of life’ projects. So the argument that snowgates will be too expensive is moot.

Besides the expense of snowgates, the city’s public works department often has two main complaints about them;

1) They narrow streets. Well guess what, any amount of snowplowing narrows streets in Sioux Falls. Drive down any street in this town at the end of winter and you will notice it isn’t as wide, not because of snowgate use, but because of snow in general, and the fact that some of these streets are narrow to begin with.

2) It will take longer to plow streets. While this is partially true, once snowplow operators get the hang of these devices, it won’t take much longer to plow the streets. As you can see in the demonstration videos above the snowplows move at a pretty good clip.

It is no secret that people love snowgates, in fact people living in the test areas over the past two years have raved about them, they also make our streets safer. Rumor has it that the city has received many positive comments about them and when public meetings have been held to talk about testing them, oodles of people have shown up to support them.

Snowgates would be a great addition to public service to our city, I can’t wait to hear more about them, I have a feeling that will be sooner rather then later.

Where is the city going with snowgates?

Director Huber throws a lot of snow at our faces about snowgates: (FF: 48:00)

I first want to share an email exchange I had with city officials on Monday;

ME: Mark (Cotter – CC Huether),

Can I get a copy of the snowgates presentation today before you present it to the council tomorrow in the informational?

Dean Borchardt: Scott, Thank you for your interest in the snow gate topic.  Public Works will be presenting directly from the memo which was previously sent to the Council and is currently posted on the City website.  We will highlight this information, discuss our future plans, and proceed directly into Councilor’s questions.  If you have any questions following the informational meeting, please let us know.

ME: So you are not going to present any test results?

DEAN: Scott, We are planning to share what we learned that can be added to our data sets.

ME: So will you be sharing test data that is not included on the city’s website currently?

NO RESPONSE after that.

I will say this, the city is just farting around on snowgates. The city council and mayor will never approve these to be used city wide. Never.

I personally think the only way snow gates will ever happen in Sioux Falls is if it is put on the ballot. While that can be messy and time consuming the nice part about an initiative is that CITIZENS get to write the ordinance, not the city.

Community activist, Theresa Stehly talked at public input Tuesday about how wonderful snow gates are (FF: 5:45)

 

 

UPDATED: Snowgates in Sioux Falls. Let’s just test them again.

UPDATED: I see the AL had to write a follow-up editorial to snow gates just one day after I initially posted this;

Snowgates are popular and many people want them. Others think it is a silly use of taxpayer money.

There’s no justification at this point to add, except that people love snowgates. Public policy and budgeting need to be based on more than what we want. We need to make those decisions based on what makes sense.

LMFAO!

Why change things now? Was a new EC a want or a need? How about Jr. Football fields?

You know who is ‘silly’? The editorial staff of the Argus Leader. While you praise monkey spas and indoor hockey and event centers, when the city is actually providing a service for taxpayers, it is ‘SILLY’ and too expensive. But a heated floor for Rhinos? That sounds like a perfect project to spend our tax dollars on.

And you sit around in meetings for hours on end, wondering why your newspaper subscriptions are in the toilet, because you don’t have a freaking clue who your subscribers are.

I don’t know whether to feel sorry for you, or just laugh it off. I’m laughing today.

Last month, the mayor of our great city left me a long voicemail about all things Mike Huether. Let me summarize it, and leave out the arm waving and good folks of SF,

“If you have a question about something, just ask me.”

Ok. I concede.

So I have been throwing things his way (still haven’t asked him his chicken salad recipe – I am a chicken salad fanatic) but I did ask him about snowgates.

Dean Borchardt, from the department of snow gate testing, I guess, sent me this email;

The 2011-2012 snow gate summary memo has been added to the City of Sioux Falls website at the following link:  http://www.siouxfalls.org/public-works/street-fleet/snow/snow-gate-analysis-pg.aspx.  I have also attached a copy of the original memo as Director Cotter requested.  We are currently on the August 21st, 4 pm City Council Informational agenda to discuss snow gates.  Thank you for your interest.

Dean Borchardt

So I guess we are going to just keep testing these things until all the test areas include the whole damn city.

The funny part about snow gates is if you put these things on the ballot, it would pass in flying colors. I found this comment interesting in the statement linked above;

We have learned a large number of homeowners support the use of snow gates in the areas we have tested in the past two winter seasons.

Duh.

Break time at the skate park

A South DaCola foot soldier sent me this, this morning. Apparently they took the picture at 7 AM and when they drove by an hour later they were still sitting there in the same spots. What we don’t know is how long they were there before 7 AM and how long they were there after 8 AM. Kinda reminds me of the sander truck driver who takes his ‘break’ hiding behind the can recycling building on my street. I see him there all the time, or the guy I would see a few summer’s ago who would read a novel while watering ONE tree at a time at Yankton Trail Park (because when you have a huge water truck like that you can only run one, 1″ hose at a time 🙂

Maybe the city needs to watch their own TV commercials?

(ABOVE: KELO-TV Screenshot)

This is no surprise, and has been going on for years.

Those who walk this area more than one time per week say walking on these conditions isn’t just slippery, it’s also frustrating.

“It’s kind of bogus. They expect us to keep up with our end of the deal and they’re not up to it. It’s frustrating for us commuters on bikes to have to get up and take that time to get through that snow,” Bull Bear said.

I have often noticed that the city takes their sweet ass time cleaning city property. Surprised they don’t require the railroad company to clean the sidewalks on the viaduct since they are the closest adjacent property. Funny how the city dictates to us that we clean THEIR sidewalks and trim THEIR trees but they can’t do it themselves. Pretty soon they will have a city ordinance requiring all pedestrians to carry around a shovel in the winter. Of course the city had an excuse;

KELOLAND News checked several bridges around the city and found many were like the viaduct. We also talked with a city official who explained that most of the bridges in the city, including the viaduct, are state property. However the city does clear them off if they receive a complaint about snow cover.

Hmmm. Bridges in SF are state property. Then why in the hell did SF taxpayers have to bond and pay for the new bridge on 41st street? So which is it?

(BELOW: Channel 16 Screenshot commercial)