snow removal

The cost of attending an Argue Endorser public forum; $25

Not sure if anyone watched the public forum at the University Center that the AL put on the other day, but it’s a hoot. Especially when Public Works director Galen Huber says he doesn’t want to make any conclusions about snowgates until they collect all the data from the season, but then shit talks them the entire time, claiming they narrow streets (even though every street in SF gets narrower during the winter, especially in the older neighborhoods where a lot of people park on both sides). What I have often wondered is why these forums are not very well attended (besides the fact that the AL is putting them on) it may have to do with the parking situation as this South DaCola foot soldier explained to me in an email;

I’m e-mailing you my “public forum/parking ticket experience”.

I attended the Argus Leader’s public forum on roads last Thursday at University Center.  When I arrived the visitor’s lot was full, so I parked out in one of the far lots.

Much to my dismay, I rec’d a $25 parking ticket!

I stopped in at the Argus office the next day, thinking that they would be willing to give the University Center a call to explain that I had been there attending the public forum.  First the receptionist called MariCarol (Editor) her response was that she had also gotten a ticket. I told the receptionist that I wanted to talk to her, but when she called her back she was suddenly unavailable. Randall Beck (Publisher) and Yvonne Hawkins (Queen of Community convos) were also at the forum, so I asked to speak to Randall – he would not talk to me either.  I don’t know if he also got a ticket, but I was right behind him when he walked out and he was parked in a faculty spot. So, I asked to speak to Yvonne, she came out, I explained the situation and told her that I did not expect the Argus to pay the ticket, but that I would like them to give the University Center a call.  She told me,

“We don’t do that kind of thing, this is your personal issue, you’re going to have to take care of it on your own.”

I was PO’d  I drove out to the Center and once I explained the situation they voided the ticket and apologized.

So much for public forums!

This comes as no surprise to me. They ask the public to attend, but do they really want them there since they ask most of the questions? I only heard questions from two attendees. One guy wondered if he could get permission to fill potholes on his street, since the city isn’t getting around to it. And another lady cornered Huber about the time allotted to clean the streets (48 Hours) but it has only been taking them 36 hours, in other words, what’s all the hub bub about snowgates taking longer?

Anti-snowgate letter, lame

I knew it was only a matter of time before someone (probably connected to public works in one way or another) wrote an anti-snowgate letter;

I live in one of the snowgate test areas and agree that there is a difference in the amount of snow at the end of my driveway because of them. It’s somewhat better.

That said, I certainly have noticed my street getting narrower as the leftover snow accumulates.

Yah think, McFly? Every street in SF gets narrower during the winter. How long have you lived here? I’m willing to deal with a narrower street so I don’t have to chip concrete blocks out of the end of my driveway. Your argument against snowgates is lame considering you started out your letter by saying they work.

Is snow removal not as good as it has been in the past?

I don’t know, on one hand, I guess it is one of those things people like to bitch about, like pot holes, but on the other hand, it is important. Has snow removal in SF ever been to everyone’s satisfaction? Probably not. But I have noticed it isn’t up to par this year, as MARICARROL KUETER from the Argus Endorser points out (read the entire ED column here);

Those of us who choose to live in snowy places are accustomed to following the established rules of winter. We shovel our sidewalks within 48 hours. We clear the entry to the mailboxes within an arm’s length of the little postal vehicle, and we never park on emergency routes – especially when 2 or more inches of snow has fallen.

In other words, we do our part. In return, is it wrong to seek a little transparency in our snow-removal process?

That’s all I’m really asking.

I would agree. Funny how the city expects us to follow the same rules they break. Reminds me of the the pig who ran a stop sign on a side street the other day. No sirens blaring. No lights flashing. Good thing he didn’t run me over.

No wonder the snow plow operators are bitter about using snowgates

I’m glad to see the union is sticking up for these guys;

The union representing the drivers says the city has refused about $1,500 in extra pay for 11 drivers called in on an overnight shift December 6-7, 2009. Union officials say the city is trying to cut its budget on the backs of its employees.

City officials and an administrative law judge who sided with the city during a grievance hearing last year say Sioux Falls did nothing wrong. They say the city needs flexibility to deal with snow emergencies.

The matter now will go before a circuit court judge.

This letter writer also points out what tax dollars are for, services to citizens;

Events center or snowgates? I vote for snowgates.