Zoo

We were never told WHY the PRICELESS Delbridge Animals were given away

Of course, the city says it was because of the Arsenic, until it wasn’t. But we were never given a reason. The rumor mil is that Denny Sanford told the Zoo board he would NOT donate to the expansion unless the dusty monkeys were gone. But in Denny’s defense, he may have just said ‘I don’t want them on the new campus.’ Which is much different then throwing them in a dumpster.

I blame this whole fiasco on the director of the Zoo. From every angle and account she orchestrated this entire thing by over reacting to Denny’s request, lying about chemical reports and even staging a Mike Huether moment of crying, which I took hook, line and sinker blaming the mayor, when in fact she was playing us all!

So tonight at the city council meeting, Robert (Bob) Kolbe, former Minnehaha County Commissioner (R) addressed the council during public input about the Delbridge Animals departing our city. He requested our city attorney’s office produce a report as to why the city came to the conclusion they had to rid ourselves of this PRICELESS collection.

Fair Request.

Bob made a threat: local historians may be hesitant to gift historical docs and assets to the city without guarantees these gifts won’t be sold or given away by the city to the highest bidder.

Mike Zitterich has his own take on this which I think I should share. Mike’s passion about this is commendable;

Directed to City Council Leadership, 
Mayor Paul TenHaken, Council Chair Rich Merkouris, City Council Vice-Chair Jennifer Sigette, and City Council Audit Committee Chair David Barranco
Dear City Council, 
City Resident Robert Kolbe had an excellent request that he presented during public comments in relation to the Delbridge Museum and the Brockhouse Taxidermy Collection situation. I believe this would be an excellent way for the city government to properly provide to the residents of the city on how city leaders came to the conclusion of why this community asset had to be given away. For the purposes of all future gifts, whether it be land, real property, tangible property, or money – the residents deserve to have full disclosure on why this community asset was so freely given up, despite a public outcry in the beginning, to better understand why some within our city government felt the need to just so ignorantly rid itself of a piece of property that many long time residents cherished. If the city government chooses to accept these types of gifts in the future, the residents deserve to have answers as to what happened with this particular asset. This is why, I have so aggressively have spoken out against the removal of the Delbridge Museum Assets, and as to why I have requested, demanded, begged the city council to utilize their full powers, by invoking our city charter, Article II, Section 2.09 in effort to investigate, put on trial all city officials, officers, agents, employees, to all departments, offices, agencies, to all non-profit corporate partners that played a role in the demise of this community asset. The ‘charter’ is a written instrument, adopted by the people of our community, entrusting the city bureaucracy to manage “our public assets” to the best of our ability, and in a faithfully, and respectful way forward. Our assets include – Public Roads, Water, Sewer, Utility, Public Parking Infrastructure, our Public Buildings, Parks, and Museums, let alone all the Public Services ‘we’ shall adopt as a community asset. By invoking your full powers, you can subpoena all documents, emails, contracts, to take public testimony, all with the end goal in providing back to the “residents’ a full detailed report, which allow the residents to make better decisions in the future. It is a shame, how a very small portion of our community can make such a decision as to throw away a “gift” that was given to the people so easily, without any cause for concern what the majority may or may not think about that decision. This report should have been done a long time ago, before the decision was made to get rid of the Brockhouse Animal Collection, but well, we all know what happened. So, in all due respect to Resident Robert Kolbe, he is 100% correct, I do feel this is something that must be done, if you wish to gain the full support of the community in future years, in relation to gifting of private property going forward. Please, honor his request, and let’s put this report together, and let’s do it for sake of differences of opinion, cause as elected officials, you are seen as agents of all the people, not just a few. 
Sincerely, and in All Due Respect, 
Mike Zitterich Resident Sioux Falls, S.D 

City of Sioux Falls Tidbits

DELBRIDGE ANIMAL COLLECTION REFERENDUM FAILS

I was told they got between 500-1000 sigs, which surprised me, because I didn’t think they would get that many. I truly believe if Sioux Falls voters were polled about keeping the collection 80%+ would say they don’t care if it gets given away. Which is unfortunate because science and art are important, not to mention we are giving away a priceless collection of mounts. But people care more about the price of eggs and who wins an Oscar then they do about history.

NOEM GETS SERIOUS ABOUT HER CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS

It seems Noem now is calling Dakota Skab ‘Fake News’;

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem‘s legal team hit a South Dakota media outlet with a cease-and-desist letter demanding that it correct and end its knowingly “false and misleading” reporting that Noem allegedly racked up hundreds of thousands of dollars on a government-issued credit card when she served as governor, Fox News Digital has learned. 

“On behalf of former South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem in her personal capacity, I write out of concern that your website continues to publish false and misleading information about my client that you have known to be false since at least July 2024,” an attorney representing Noem in her personal capacity said in a letter to the co-founders of a South Dakota outlet called The Dakota Scout. The letter was obtained by Fox News Digital on Thursday. 

“Specifically, your website repeatedly, and inaccurately, refers to all charges on credit cards used by the Office of the Governor of South Dakota as charges of my client—allowing a conclusion by multiple commenters on the site and other news outlets that my client violated the laws of South Dakota or stole taxpayer funds for her personal use,” it continued.  “We demand that The Dakota Scout immediately cease spreading these false, misleading, and inaccurate statements and take immediate and significant steps to correct past inaccuracies.

Reading a FOX news story is like reading a 7th grader’s book report, either way, when I have read all the stories about her hair and nail receipts it seemed clear to me she was spending the money on her staff. But that is NOT what is in question, the question is why were you racking up these CC bills so your staff could travel with you? The taxpayers of SD shouldn’t have to foot the bill so your Trump ass-kissing entourage can parade all over the US. I’m sure the DS will fight this, but Noem’s law firm is pretty tough at this stuff. I think it would be ironic if the suit bankrupts the fledgling paper and the county commission, city council and school district have to grovel back to the Argus to print their legals. I’m sure the Argus would be happy to oblige, but I am guessing under a whole new rate.

SIOUX FALLS CITY COUNCIL GETS ROLLED BY THE MAYOR ON DUD FENCE

At the council meeting Tuesday night I spoke during public input (2:20:00) after Jordan Deffenbaugh spoke about the lack of policy leadership and transparency of the current council (47:30). I also told the council they need their own outside counsel (law firm) to write policy and they should put a line in next year’s budget for the expenditure. I knew it was going to be 8 yes votes. First off, because the council is extremely predictable and when I texted councilors to please vote no, I got no response, so I knew how this was going down. They act like they need unity on all votes, you don’t. I told them solving the problems of the city doesn’t take unity between councilors and the mayor it is about solving problems and sometimes you have to vote NO and start over. Many constituents including myself know this was cooked up by the mayor’s office and not dropped in councilor’s laps until the Thursday before the meeting, and let’s just say they weren’t happy about it. If I was them, I would have all voted NO and told the mayor that they will come up with a better solution within 30 days. Grow a sack already council.

WHY IS A NON-PROFIT PROVIDING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LOANS?

I received a postcard in the mail recently from Habitat for Humanity asking me to apply for this program. Someone asked me how I would have received this. I said, I worked in direct mail for 30 years and you can buy a list for anything. So I am sure they purchased a mailing list that had homeowners in a certain income bracket, and that would certainly be me, LOL. While I appreciate this program, it had me thinking, why isn’t the city mailing out postcards for their similar program thru the Feds of community development loans? The premise is the same, help with needed home repairs. There is a reason we had to but a fence around the Dud, there is NO affordable housing in Sioux Falls and the places that are affordable are falling apart.

Petition Rally – To Save the Brockhouse Animal Collection

Precinct Committeeman, Mike Zitterich has scheduled a “Rally Event” to Collect Signatures to Get City of Sioux Falls Resolution #13-25 on a public ballot to allow the voters to hold a public vote.

All Precinct Committee Members Invited, Bring Your Families, Friends, and Neighbors. This is a Community Grassroots Effort.

ALL REGISTERED VOTERS OF MINNEHAHA & LINCOLN COUNTY that are Sioux Falls Residents may sign this Petition, with the hope of voting in a Special Citywide Election thereafter.

We need no less than 7,552 Signatures, Shooting for 9,000+

Sincerely,

Mike Zitterich

Minnehaha County,

Precinct 5-18

Concerned Citizens of Sioux Falls’

Why did the Brockhouse Collection deteriorate so fast?

That’s a great question, from the last inspection from the private consultant;

As the council votes to give away the collection tonight, in which they will, they have to ask what the Hell was the Zoo doing to eliminate this collection purposely. Also there is a referendum circulating that needs about 7,600 valid sigs in 20 days to save the collection.

Also, I heard 4 councilors were set to save the collection but feared the mayor would break the tie so they just voted YES. WHY?! If you are opposed to something, don’t consult with the mayor, consult with your fellow councilors and VOTE NO. I have always felt a NO vote is way more impactful because you force government to go back to the drawing board and come up with a better solution. So if you feel you need to vote NO, just do it. The public would respect you more if you stuck to your principles.

Delbridge Museum Public Resolution – Tuesday, February 11, 2025, 6:00 PM

As you know Lenin’s Tomb of Dead Monkeys is headed to Notre Dame on Tuesday. A guest post from Mike Z;

On Tuesday, February 6, 2025 – the City Council is being asked to Adopt the following “Resolution” to Surplus, and Remove All Specimens no later than September 30, 2025.  For All those who wish to attend this City Council Meeting, this meeting will take place at the Carnegie Town Hall with all members present – The Mayor and Eight City Council Members.  The Meeting begins at 6:00 PM and each person shall have no more than 5 Minutes to Speak on this particular agenda item. “We” need at least 5 Council Members to Vote No on this Resolution to defeat it. 
I Highly Recommend that All Residents to whom wish to Speak to the City Council this Tuesday, hereby contact the City Council as soon as possible, recommending that the council vote “No” on the following resolution, while further, recommending a plan forward that instructs the city council to invoke its chartered powers as per Section 2.09 to Investigate the Situation using their subpoena powers to hold further, all public officials, officers, agents, employees accountable for their actions in relation to the Delbridge Museum, let alone, allowing them to subpoena any documents, public records, emails, other important items, enabling the community to gather all facts, truths, and understanding of what the Mayor’s Office, Department of Parks & Recreation, Great Plains Zoo, and Sioux Falls Butterfly House and Aquarium have been attempting to do between September 1, 2022 and September 30, 2024. 
The End Goal should be to instruct the City Council to bring forth a future ordinance to which does the following: 

  • Does Not Surplus the Delbridge Museum Taxidermy Collection
  • Directs City Government to Refurbish, Preserve, Maintain Ownership
  • Maintain Public Displays of Taxidermy on All Public Property
  • Directs City Council to Fund Permanent Home of Taxidermy
  • Keep the Taxidermy Within City Limits @ Zoo or Other Public Places
  • Honors the Gifting Agreement as Established by C.J Delbridge
  • Preserves, and Protects the Henry Brockhouse Family Desires, Memory

Below, is the Resolution in Question:
A Resolution that Promises to Surplus and Give Away the Brockhouse Animal Collection to Three Out-Of-State Institutions

A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE BROCKHOUSE ANIMAL COLLECTION SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE GIFTING TO UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME, INSTITUTE FOR NATURAL HISTORY ARTS, INC., AND THE ODDITIES MUSEUM, INC.

  • WHEREAS, Henry Brockhouse, a Sioux Falls businessman, was an avid hunter in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s, and, as a result, he acquired an extensive collection of mounted animals from six continents (the “Brockhouse Animal Collection” or “Collection”) which he displayed to customers and visitors for many years in his West Sioux Hardware store (“West Sioux”) until his death in 1978; and
  • WHEREAS, many of these species are protected under the Endangered Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, Lacey Act, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act; and
  • WHEREAS, in 1981, C.J. and Alene Delbridge purchased the Brockhouse Animal Collection from West Sioux; and
  • WHEREAS, between 1981 and 1985, the Delbridges gifted the Brockhouse Animal Collection in its entirety to the City with no reversionary interest; and
  • WHEREAS, the City has full legal ownership of the Brockhouse Animal Collection, which are listed individually in the document attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
  • WHEREAS, from 1984 to 2023, the City housed and publicly displayed the Brockhouse Animal Collection at the Delbridge Museum of Natural History (“Delbridge Museum”) located at the Great Plains Zoo campus; and
  • WHEREAS, over the years, the Collection has undergone several assessments by consultants to determine its current condition and to identify its needs with its advancing age as the animal mounts are 50 to 80 years old; and
  • WHEREAS, in 2023, the Zoological Society of Sioux Falls, the manager of the Great Plains Zoo, as part of its routine assessment of the Collection, sent in swab tests for chemicals and subsequently received lab results from Midwest Laboratories (“Lab”) that 79.5 percent of the Collection tested positive for arsenic, a chemical which had been used in the taxidermy process for the preservation of hides in the era when Brockhouse first acquired these animals in this Collection, which led to the closure of the Delbridge Museum in August of 2023 to explore other options; and
  • WHEREAS, in September 2023, Mayor TenHaken convened a work group to specify the next steps for the Brockhouse Animal Collection; and-
  • WHEREAS, the work group engaged A.M. Art Conservation, LLC, and George Dante Studios to assess the Collection. The site visit occurred February 5–9, 2024, and the report was finalized July 8, 2024; and
  • WHEREAS, over several months, presentations were made to the work group showing the following: (1) Canopy Strategic Partners’ analysis of visitors at the Great Plains Zoo usage data shows poor visitation to the Delbridge Museum at 2.8 percent of total zoo attendees spending 7 minutes or more in the Delbridge Museum when it was operational between the period of 2017 and 2023; (2) A.M. Art Conservation, LLC and George Dante Studios provided a cost proposal to restore the mounts which was estimated at roughly $850,000 (excluding cost for cleaning, transportation, and arsenic treatment); (3) 18 of the specimens were deemed “not recommended for treatment”; (4) a new building to store the Collection was preliminarily estimated to cost between $6 million and $7 million, which includes the diorama expense and 6-foot-tall glass partitions ($1 million) or the fully-enclosed glass systems ($2 million), which is the best practice to safely display the Collection; and (5) there would be ongoing annual operating costs to include marketing of the Collection after this major investment of $126,000/year.
  • WHEREAS, the work group recommended that state law be changed, which would allow disposition of the taxidermy mounts to out-of-state nonprofit organizations; and
  • WHEREAS, in early 2024, House Bill 1100, amending SDCL 6-13-15, passed and became effective July 1, 2024, which secured an exemption for taxidermy to allow the Delbridge mounts to be legally transported out of state, facilitating donation to other out-of-state nonprofit institutions; and
  • WHEREAS, on September 20, 2024, the City issued a Request for Qualification and Expression of Interest (“RFQEI”) to gauge interest from qualified entities for future ownership, management, preservation, and utilization of the Brockhouse Collection; and
  • WHEREAS, the City received six proposals in response to the RFQEI and no qualified 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization from South Dakota submitted a proposal; and
  • WHEREAS, the University of Notre Dame, the Institute for Natural History Arts, Inc., and Oddities Museum, Inc. find it desirable to acquire a portion of the Collection as follows: • 117 specimens—University of Notre Dame • 33 specimens—Oddities Museum, Inc. • 2 specimens—Institute for Natural History Arts, Inc.
  • WHEREAS, the University of Notre Dame, the Institute for Natural History Arts, Inc., and Oddities Museum, Inc. are all 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations; and
  • WHEREAS, pursuant to SDCL 6-13-1, the governing board of a public subdivision may gift property which the governing board has, by appropriate motion, determined is no longer necessary, useful, or suitable for the purpose for which it was acquired; and
  • WHEREAS, pursuant to SDCL 6-13-15, any municipality may provide as a gift to any nonprofit organization that is recognized as an exempt organization under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to January 1, 1996, any collection of specimens preserved by a taxidermist that has been housed in a museum or other display owned by the municipality. The gift may include collection display and storage fixtures and related tangible personal property; and
  • WHEREAS, based on the above findings, the City hereby finds the Collection is no longer necessary, useful, or suitable for the purpose for which it was acquired; and
  • WHEREAS, the Sioux Falls Zoo and Aquarium Board met on August 23, 2023, and unanimously recommended the Collection be declared surplus; and
  • WHEREAS, the Brockhouse Animal Collection at Delbridge Museum work group met on January 17, 2025, and unanimously recommended the Collection be declared surplus and recommended the City Council authorize the gifting of the Collection to the University of Notre Dame, the Institute for Natural History Arts, Inc., and Oddities Museum, Inc; and
  • WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Board met on January 29, 2025, and unanimously recommended the Collection be declared surplus and recommended the City Council authorize the gifting of the Collection to the University of Notre Dame, the Institute for Natural History Arts, Inc., and Oddities Museum, Inc.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, SD: 
Section 1. That the recitals above are adopted as findings and are incorporated herein by reference. 
Section 2. The City hereby declares, pursuant to SDCL Chapter 6-13, the Brockhouse Animal Collection housed at the Delbridge Museum of Natural History to be surplus property and is no longer necessary, useful, or suitable for the purpose for which it was acquired. In support of this determination, the City found that one, all, or a combination of these factors listed in the recitals support a determination for surplus. 
Section 3. That, pursuant to SDCL 6-13-15, the Brockhouse Animal Collection identified in Exhibit A is hereby gifted to the following 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations: the University of Notre Dame; the Oddities Museum, Inc., and the Institute for Natural History Arts, Inc. 
Section 4. The above-described Collection shall be divided as follows:

  1. 117 specimens—University of Notre Dame 
  2.  33 specimens—Oddities Museum, Inc. 
  3. 2 specimens—Institute for Natural History Arts, Inc. 

Section 5. The City shall publish this resolution with attachment after its passage. The attachment is on file and available for inspection in the office of the City Clerk.The division of the Collection is depicted in Exhibit A

As per the contracts being agreed to, All Specimens must be Removed from the Delbridge Museum no later than September 30, 2025