July 2015

Does the Railroad Relocation project have any value to Federal & City taxpayers?

100MEDIA36IMAG4378

The (forced) announcement today, where the mayor announced NO questions from NON press. I guess we can’t ask how you are spending our money.

IMAG4385

The depot will remain under the poorly proposed plan

While nothing has been signed yet, the redline of the project was completed on Monday. The environmental study revealed that low levels of petroleum and lead were found at the site and 6” of brownfield will have to be removed before doing any development in the area. We will also have to put a security fence around the project while it is being prepared for development.

Where I see no value in the project is that two major RR lines will still remain downtown, which I assume will become even more busy. One of them crosses Cliff Avenue, and frankly is a pain in the ass as it is. I also don’t see the value in buying land to prepare an old RR yard for developers to buy. Then there is the relocation costs associated that we are basically giving to the RR. They are the ones moving, it shouldn’t be on the backs of taxpayers to help them with the move. While the developers will be required to do their own environmental study at the time of purchase, I still think all along this should have been a private matter between the RR and the developers. While the Feds did have to be involved, our city government should have kept its nose out a deal that is just going to cost us more money in the long run and not really solve the problems with train traffic downtown. According to the Mayor, it sounds like it is just going to be another park. Big whoop. How about cleaning up the park just 2 blocks away to the North?

The mayor, of course had to bring up the naysayers and how this project is bigger than the Events Center (thank God we are only building a fence and not siding a building). I find his ‘naysayer’ comment a bit hypocritical. I remember Huether being the biggest naysayer about this project when we were debating whether or not to build a Events Center downtown. I truly think that really put a hiccup in the process.

The city council will only approve this through a resolution on August 4th. No real discussion, no public input, no debate.

While I am happy that the tracks will be moved out of this area, this project is nothing more then another handout to the already super rich developers in our city AND it does nothing to end rail traffic downtown. Huether, Johnson, Daschle and Thune, thanks for nothing, but more federal debt. Ironic how Huether makes fun of Washington, but gladly takes money from them. He did it after the ice storm, and now with the RR relocation project.

Click to enlarge below graphic of press release;

IMAG4389

UPDATE: I lost what little shred of confidence I had in getting an honest answer from the city of Sioux Falls IT department

UPDATE: The webcam is now working in several browsers (12:30 PM, 7/22/2015) when I posted this over an hour ago it was not.

paintitblack

This is what the indoor aquatic center construction looks like at night, and during the day to.

A few months ago I ran into a guy at my neighborhood watering hole, he introduced himself and said, “You’re that South DaCola guy.” Then he proceeded to tell me a long story about how he worked for the city of Sioux Falls IT department. He quit after a short period of time because his manager accused him of being ‘too ambitious’ on a project he was assigned, because he was actually solving problems and doing it in a very timely manner. He basically concluded to me he couldn’t work in that kind of environment. See programmers are SUPPOSED to be doing exactly that, solving problems. Apparently they go by a different philosophy working in the city’s IT department.

Last night at the informational meeting one of the supervisors came up to explain the problems with SIRE and that a new operating system should be working by August 4th. Great news. He also told us that the webcam for the indoor aquatic center construction site IS working, but may not work on all devices.

It’s not working on any device. After the meeting I tried it on a PC and a MAC and an I-Phone. I used several web browsers (Firefox, Chrome, Explorer & Safari). No luck. The webcam is working on city computers (I’m assuming because it is hooked up through the intranet network with the city, but they haven’t created a stream out of the firewall for the internet). Wouldn’t a web programmer check that before going live with it?

Also, the gentleman was questioned about the editing of SIRE videos. He said that they have not edited any videos. Yet we have shown that one of the recent videos was edited/altered or corrupted twice. Either that or they really have some issues with data storage, and funny how the ‘hiccups’ in the video happened at the exact same time.

It worries me a little that people of this kind of incompetence are running our city’s IT department. They are in charge of more things then just council meeting videos and webcams. They have to make sure the city’s public safety, accounting, traffic control and building services systems are working. If they can’t get a simple webcam to work, one wonders how these other systems are working?

Railroad Relocation project announcement Wednesday?

That’s the $40 million dollar question?

Officials are expected to announce the details of the deal between the city, federal regulators, BNSF Railway and the Ellis & Eastern Railroad. Under the terms of the deal, BNSF would receive millions of dollars for giving up the use of its rail yard.

The first thought that popped into my head is how or why would we be paying the railroad for land that is technically the Feds (ours) already. This explanation is going to be an interesting one. While the land that their buildings are on could technically be sold, I thought anything with tracks laying on it are Federal right-a-way and should go back to the Feds at NO charge.

My second thought was why was the Argus briefed about this before the city council (who will get briefed in executive session today after the informational, probably about the project). If the press conference is supposed to happen Wednesday, why is the administration waiting less then 24 hours to tell council? When I talked to council chair Kenny Anderson about this a few weeks ago, he said that the lawyers were mulling through the deal and it would be announced soon. Then bam, out of nowhere, without council knowledge, the Argus puts it out there. Seems the Mayor’s office has a mole with loose lips.

 

The ‘Tuthill’ ghost and Events Center siding have a lot in common

dest_v001_001

Just like that, the siding will be fixed, just as soon as you catch me!

Is it time the SFPD comes clean on the Tuthill shooting incident?

Maybe it is time they tell us ‘what’ or ‘if’ anything happened that night.

As I have mentioned in the past, the chief of police, Doug Barthel has said that certain types of evidence wouldn’t be released because he believed ‘it wouldn’t help solve the case.’

Guess what Doug, you haven’t solved it yet, maybe it is time to release the evidence?

Let me start by saying that I think the SFPD has been very successful over this past year solving crimes. Drug busts, murders, prostitution and robberies, within a few days. Heck, they even caught a graffiti artist (and those guys are sneaky 🙂

Where I am going with this? Doesn’t anyone think it is strange that the police department has been so successful solving many of these difficult crimes but they can’t find the Tuthill mystery person who was shot at on the night of New Year’s Day?

As I have said in the past, I do believe the officer saw ‘something’. But what we don’t know is ‘what’. There was an internal investigation (The county sheriff’s office and DCI did not investigate), NO audio was released to the public from his body audio recorder, a crime scene map has not been released to the public and a reward has been offered.

Ironically, this case is a lot like the Events Center siding issue, the public has only been given ‘tidbits’ but nothing concrete. Maybe the city could keep press conference costs down, they could tell us about the Tuthill cold case the same time they tell us what is going on with the siding.

Let’s face it, the EC siding issue is an embarrassment to the administration and the Tuthill shooting incident is an embarrassment to the police department. They will go away, quietly in the night, no pun intended.

Maybe the BID tax needs an audit instead of a spending review?

While I support continuing to use the BID tax on promoting Sioux Falls and NOT on brick and mortar projects, I found this tidbit of information interesting;

2015 CVB-BID EXPENSES

Administrative – $766,855, Sales Development – $669,943, Tourism promotion – $263,402

Instead reviewing the program to see how the mayor can pilfer money from it, maybe they need an independent audit instead. I find the administrative costs to be very high compared to what is actually spent on promotion. Maybe that is the real reason they want to look at it? But if that is the case, like I said, I would prefer an accountant breaking those expenses down and not a hand-picked, rubber stamp group the mayor picks.