June 2024

DRINKING LIBERALLY UPDATE (6/14/2024)

In politics: Nationally (kind of): In 2023 the Legislature allocated $383 million for a new prison. In October,  the Department of Corrections designated Lincoln County as the site for the new prison and transferred land it owned to the South Dakota Department of Corrections for that purpose. The location is six miles northwest of Canton, SD and maybe 6 or 7 miles south of the growing Sioux Falls suburban town of Harrisburg. Despite their strong Republican leanings and support for the GOP’s  past “Law and Order” stance, landowners in the area are very upset. They contend our Republican Governor and the Republican dominated Legislature in Pierre will not listen to them and ignore local zoning regulations. Lincoln County Landowners filed suit seeking compliance. A hearing was held in January of 2024 but the Court hasn’t ruled yet. In the meantime the Department of Corrections has stated it is not considering a second site. 

I think this conundrum could be solved if the Department of Corrections decided to name the new prison the “President Donald J. Trump Memorial Prison”. We all know how much Trump adores placing his name on monolithic buildings and, as strong Trump supporters who invariably conform to whatever he desires, the mainly Republican residents in Lincoln County will most likely reconcile their opposition to the new prison and be honored to have a prison named after the “Donald” as a neighbor. 

This is such a simple solution to the current conundrum that I think we should start a petition to present to the Governor and others showing the Public’s support for it. Let’s discuss whether or not Drinking Liberally should lead the petition drive tonight. 

 In Politics: South Dakota. The Democratic Party (SDDP) will hold its Biennial State Convention in Oacoma this weekend. Besides constructing a Political Platform, the other essential items of business are choosing a candidate to the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and selecting the National Committeeman and the National Committeewoman for the Party.  No one has announced their candidacy for the PUC as of this writing .  Deb Knecht (Brown County) and Dennis Olsen (Beadle County) currently hold the National Committeeman and woman positions and both have announced they will seek reelection. Deb Knecht is currently unopposed but I have heard that Tom Cool (Sioux Falls) will challenge Dennis Olsen. These positions require expensive travel to national Democratic meetings but despite that, it would be good to see some new blood. Deb has been in her position for a long time and (IMHO) Dennis shows more concern for Beadle County matters than state and national issues. It would be good to have at least one of these two positions held by someone from outside the James River Valley.

I hope the SDDP ends their “Happy Talk” and addresses the continuing decline in Democratic voter registration in South Dakota both relative to Republican voter registration and in terms of absolute numbers. Democratic voter registration currently stands at 143,903 or 23.8% of the electorate compared to Republican registration of 306,009 or 50.6%. Since our June Primary 10 days ago, the Republican plurality over Democrats increased by 938 voters. Beginning in May and looking back monthly, the Republican plurality over Democratic registration increased as follows:  (May) 1689, 1382,1148, 1503, 1226, (Jan) 502. Or, to look at the decline more broadly, since the current leadership recalled Jennifer Slaight Hansen, the Democratic voter registration deficit against Republicans statewide has increased by 11,034 voters, nearly total the vote for all candidates in many South Dakota Legislative Districts.  I keep waiting for the new SDDP leadership to begin to reverse the long term decline in Democratic Registration. 

So we waited several months for this?

We were told that the new E-Bike ordinance would NOT go into effect until June 1st because the city needed time to put up new signage. Mainly at the trailheads and SPEED LIMIT signs. So when June 1st rolled around I asked where was the signage? A couple of days after my inquiry this goofy pavement PSA (that will melt in the heat) showed up a couple of places on the trail.

Government moves in the speed of snail.

Also, I love the top of the graphic compared to the bottom. It says SHARE, so wouldn’t you show what is ALLOWED in a big graphic and what is NOT ALLOWED in a small graphic? Seems scoldy.

I don’t think most people care.

I tried to take a pic of a dude tonight on the trail, but I was laughing so hard I couldn’t get out my phone. First off, he didn’t look old enough to drink, but whatevs, but this dude was riding an electric foot scooter on the trail balancing himself on a case of Corona bottles (like I said, doubt he was old enough to drink based on his beer choice and container choice, and safety precautions 🙂

UPDATE: New Sioux Falls City Council out to lunch

UPDATE: A new city councilor reached out and told me they have a policy of not using specific names that are revealed in public input. While I understand if it is a baseless accusation, this is factual.

It did not take long for the new city council to start ignoring me. LOL. I was aware that the city council must amend minutes, but I thought I would send the question to the city clerk first (you will enjoy his response). Then I forwarded the entire message to the city council. As I pointed out, they are using my real name in the minutes and not a general term like ‘Constituent’ so they should use the real name of the councilor I mentioned, Marshall Selberg.

Not one single councilor responded, meaning they have no intention of amending. You do realize by ignoring my request and not changing the minutes means you are just a part of the cover up. Just sayin’.

I sometimes wonder who is giving councilors legal advice . . .

ORIGINAL EMAIL;

Hello Jermery,

I noticed in the minutes for the meeting last week it said this under public input;

‘Scott Ehrisman spoke on TIFs, development & project costs, and a previous Councilor not living in the district he represented.’

I would like the minutes AMENDED at the next meeting so it says;

‘Scott Ehrisman spoke on TIFs, development & project costs, and a previous Councilor, Marshall Selberg, not living in the district he represented.’

I clearly stated Mr. Selberg’s name, and would like that added to the minutes.

Thank You,

Scott L. Ehrisman

CITY CLERK’S INITIAL RESPONSE;

Good afternoon,

The minutes will remain accurate and as drafted.  Only City Council can amend them at this point.

Jermery J. Washington, City Clerk // City of Sioux Falls

MY FORWARDED EMAIL TO CITY COUNCIL;

Hello Councilors,

I requested from the city clerk an amendment to the meeting minutes of last week’s regular meeting (see my original email at bottom).

He has informed me that the council has to amend (see below). So I am requesting an amendment.

I clearly stated Marshall Selberg’s name and it should be reflected in the record as I said it. For example it doesn’t say ‘A constituent spoke . . .’ It states my written name. I stated the previous councilor’s name, and it needs to be reflected in the record AS my name is clearly reflected in the record.

Thank You,

Scott L. Ehrisman

Look who we give the biggest subsidy to

During the city council working session today they discussed all the different non-profits and other services the city helps subsidize. As you can see, most is for kids, families, homeless, public parks, public art, etc., yet the biggest grifter at the trough is Forward Sioux Falls.

Speaking of subsidies, I was discussing over the weekend with some friends the new refrigerated ice rink, they seem to be confused about the gift and mostly the subsidy. I told them that it is funny we are spending close to $100 million in this area between private and public dollars, yet every night, Camp Levitt is open for business.

How about funding something that gives these folks a safe place to sleep for the night?

Screenshot