October 2025

Is Mitchell trying to steal sales tax revenue from Sioux Falls?

I found this story intriguing, and I didn’t even know you could hire a consultant to do this kind of work;

Alabama-based Retail Strategies community partnerships associate Banks Perry will present to the council on a data-driven approach to attract retailers and developers to Mitchell. 

According to Hanson, the Retail Strategies process involves tracking when people from Mitchell and the surrounding areas go and buy something in Sioux Falls at a certain store, and based on that, Retail Strategies calls that store to recruit that store or a competitor store to come to Mitchell.

Good for Mitchell! Not so good for Sux 🙁 Maybe we should hire a consultant to find out what kind of retailers we want to steal from Mitchell – LMFAO!

Can we attract an all nude strip club? How about a gymnasium covered in corn? And who doesn’t miss Happy Chef?

I kind of feel bad for the Mayor of Mitchell on this one, it is actually a GREAT idea, and pretty cheap for consultant fees, so I don’t understand why he is getting so much grief.

Maybe Thrive failed due to Executive Compensation?

So while Thrive did help a lot of people and worked on some great studies, after looking over tax docs, (Listed below the 2024 info is info for other tax years: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2017. Although not specifically identified as paid to Erpenbach, it looks like 2020 was the first year in which executive compensation was paid.) it makes you wonder if the Executive Director, Michelle Erpenbach, was more concerned about compensation over results.

Over 50% of revenue going towards salaries in 2024 with Erpenbach getting 16% of that revenue. How can an organization function when over 50% of revenue doesn’t go towards programming? Well, as we found out, it can’t.

Michelle learned from the best on how to draw a nice salary working for a non-profit without producing results.

Planning Commission out to lunch even when they show up

Attendance got a little better last night with 6 voting members in attendance, but the level of ignorance hit a new high.

Item #5A was an obvious ‘work around’ the law. While legal, completely shady.

The applicant bought a liquor license for a different location, realizing they couldn’t use it at that location they had to move it. While this happens a lot in Sioux Falls, this one takes on a new twist. Not only do they want to move their liquor license they only want to move it temporarily (where they can’t use it because that location is currently under construction) then once the intended location is finished they will once again move the license. In other words they are essentially putting a liquor license in ‘storage’ which I would think would not be legal. So after all the applicant’s testimony and the Planning Commission staffers basically lying about how the situation needed to be handled you would think the PC members would be weary about supporting this dubious plan using legal loopholes. Nope, all 6 voting members supported it. The worst part was before they approved it, they asked tons of ignorant questions about liquor licenses. How can you approve this when you don’t even know how the system works? The next mayor needs to remove every single member of that board and replace with new folks that actually want to serve the public and at least have an inkling of how things work in Planning.