Open Government

Cap & Trade and Green Energy production will drive energy costs up?

But when utility companies spend money greasing the palms of our PUC officials that has nothing to do with our energy costs going up?

Public Utilities Commissioner Gary Hanson solicited money for an energy conference from many of the Midwest utility companies that the PUC regulates.

If this is the kind of thing that Gary thinks is okay, I would prefer he does not run for Mayor of Sioux Falls next year. We already have enough of that shit going on in City Hall.

Otter Tail Power Co., a $2,500 sponsor of last week’s conference, has a 15.3 percent rate increase, or $3.8 million, pending before the South Dakota PUC.

Kind of like Sioux Falls developers funding the campaigns of the City Councilors who voted for an unecessary tax increase last year that benefits them. But hey, there is no connection, just look the other way.

“The simple answer is, they should have never done this,” said David Schultz, a professor of business at Hamline University in St. Paul and a frequent lecturer on political ethics. “I question the motive, the conflict of interest is there. Customers, going forward, will question whether their next rate increase is on merit, or based on a trivial, but important, sponsorship as the utilities came through for these commissioners when they needed it.”

I have questioned utility sponsorship for years. This story is way overdue. For instance one of the biggest sponsors of SculptureYawn is Excel Energy, with it’s state director being the key founder, who probably spends countless hours of company time and resources to organize the event. I even talked to the VP of Excel about it once on the phone, wondering how the SD director can be critical of SculptureWalk dissenters (myself) on company time? Of course he defended him, basically saying he has to freewill to do what he wants. How do I get a job like that? While I am all for corporations sponsoring public art, I question our rates going up every year while service gets poorer. How about finding ways to save customers money on utilities instead throwing thousands of dollars around for din-dins and gigantic welded metal geese and turtles?

lgbrz12turtle01757

Once again, pay to play is alive and well in South Dakota and it’s time the State Legislature ponied up and made this practice illegal. Yeah right, who am I kidding?

Today’s champion of open government: Fox News?!?!?

 

Actually Fox Business Network.

The network filed a FOIA request to see where exactly our tax dollars (and our kids’ and our grandkids’) are going. Due to a little heal dragging on the part of the Treasury Department, Fox sued them to force them to release the data, including details such as what “toxic” assets were purchased, any collateral involved, and any restrictions put on the use of the money.

Kevin Magee, Executive Vice President, FOX News commented, “The Treasury has repeatedly ignored our requests for information on how the government is allocating money to these troubled institutions. In a critical time like this amidst mounting corruptions and an economic crisis, we as a news organization feel it’s more important than ever to hold the government accountable.”

So there you have it. The journalistic crusaders at Fox have shown today that every once in a while,  they do something right. Here’s hoping they win.

Open records with Exceptions? What’s so ‘open’ about that?

Good luck getting this door open.

Senator Knudson is wasting his time if he thinks their needs to be exceptions;

This year, the presumption of openness bill is being written by Senate Republican Leader Dave Knudson of Sioux Falls.  He says the legislation will presume government records are open and will contain a list of specific exceptions.

Chuck Baldwin, a journalist in residence in the Contemporary Media and Journalism Department at the University of South Dakota, says the exceptions in the pending bill will determine its quality.

Or it’s viability. Federal law already protects citizens personal information from being shared, such as Social Security numbers. Either write and pass a bill with some teeth in it, or don’t bother. This is just more showboating by another Republican running for governor in 2010.

I think we should change the name of SD to 50th

South Dakota Ranks Last in Non-Partisan Survey of Transparency, Accountability, and Limits in Government  
“Walking away from reform is not an option,” SDCAC says 

 

Pierre, SD -  South Dakota ranked 50th out or all 50 states in a recent survey of openness and government integrity.  

 

The Better Government Association, an independent and non-partisan government watchdog group, released their 2008 survey findings on transparency, accountability, and limits in government.  The survey ranked each of the 50 states in five areas of law: open records, whistleblower protections, campaign finance, open meetings, and conflicts of interest. 

 

“South Dakota didn’t beat out any other state” said BGA Executive Director Jay Stewart, “and there is clearly a lot of room for improvement.  If you look at the percentage score, South Dakota received 32%, the equivalent of a F letter grade, hardly a cause for celebration.”

 

South Dakotans supported open government reforms in a June 2008 McLaughlin & Associates scientific public opinion poll.  Over 70% of those polled supported reforms that would: stop taxpayer dollars from being used for lobbying and political campaigns, stop politicians from handing out “pay-to-play” government contracts, making the relationships between government contractors and elected officials transparent, stop golden parachutes, and placing the current common sense public disclosure laws and ethics reforms at federal level in South Dakota law. 
  
Lee Breard, Executive Director of the SD CAC, said, “Clearly from this study there is a problem and polling shows there is overwhelming public support for reform.  South Dakotans largely agreed with the major concepts in Initiated Measure 10 but obviously believed the initial approach was flawed”  
 
“Now is the time to take the issue of openness and transparency in government back to the people and the peoples’ representatives,” said Breard.  “While voters were confused with the specific language of Measure 10, largely due to the $1 million TV campaign by National Education Association union officials in Washington, D.C., fighting to preserve the status quo, there is overwhelming public support for openness and reform.”
 
“With South Dakota ranked last in openness and integrity clearly the status quo is not acceptable and just walking away from common sense reform is not an option,” said Breard. 

 

Breard noted that in an editorial, the Black Hills Pioneer agreed.


“After seeing efforts to open government fail during the 2008 legislative session, we have to agree that the Better Government Association has a point,” the Pioneer said.  “South Dakotans may be open, friendly people, but their government is closed and hostile to anything it perceives as an intrusion on its authority.  The report makes it clear that South Dakota has failed to adapt to modern demands for openness.”

“Measure 10, which was resoundingly defeated last week, was supposedly an effort to create a more open government,” the Pioneer continued.  “It had many flaws, but its central point was worthwhile: far too much happens behind closed doors in this state, be it government contracts — ‘millions are awarded annually in no-bid processes’ — pardons and court proceedings.”
http://www.bhpioneer.com/articles/2008/11/12/opinion/editorials/doc491b11c81bd27205749055.txt

  
Follow this link to read the full report from the
Better Government Association.  

 

 

###Â